Reading nutrition labels is associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome in Korean adults

The 2007-2008 Korean NHANES

H. T. Kang, J. Y. Shim, Yongjae Lee, J. A. Linton, B. J. Park, H. R. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and aims: Several studies demonstrated that reading nutrition labels was associated with healthier food choices, despite some controversy. This study investigated the association between the use of nutrition labels and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in Korean adults. Methods and results: This cross-sectional study included 7756 individuals who participated in the 2007-2009 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). A self-reported questionnaire was used to determine participant's awareness of nutrition labels. Modified Asian criteria based on a harmonizing definition of MetS were adopted. Individuals in the group that read nutrition labels (the Reading Group) were youngest and leanest, but their daily caloric intake fell between that of the group that did not read nutrition labels (the Non-Reading Group) and the group that did not know about them (the Not-Knowing Group). The prevalence of MetS was 16.8% in the Reading Group, 27.2% in the Non-Reading Group, and 47.3% in the Not-Knowing Group. In comparison to participants in the Reading Group, the odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for MetS in the participants in the Non-Reading Group and Not-Knowing Group were 1.85 (1.60-2.14) and 4.44 (3.79-5.20), respectively, when not adjusted. The relationship between the use of nutrition labels and MetS remained statistically significant even after adjusting for covariates such as age, sex and socioeconomic status including household income and education level [1.27 (1.05-1.53) in the Non-Reading Group and 1.34 (1.05-1.70) in the Not-Knowing Group]. Conclusion: Reading nutrition labels appeared to be associated with a lower prevalence of MetS in a nationally representative sample of Korean adults.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)876-882
Number of pages7
JournalNutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
Volume23
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Nutrition Surveys
Reading
Energy Intake
Social Class
Cross-Sectional Studies
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Education
Food

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

@article{f3c8fb58d53641a4b0800d26a983bdbe,
title = "Reading nutrition labels is associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome in Korean adults: The 2007-2008 Korean NHANES",
abstract = "Background and aims: Several studies demonstrated that reading nutrition labels was associated with healthier food choices, despite some controversy. This study investigated the association between the use of nutrition labels and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in Korean adults. Methods and results: This cross-sectional study included 7756 individuals who participated in the 2007-2009 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). A self-reported questionnaire was used to determine participant's awareness of nutrition labels. Modified Asian criteria based on a harmonizing definition of MetS were adopted. Individuals in the group that read nutrition labels (the Reading Group) were youngest and leanest, but their daily caloric intake fell between that of the group that did not read nutrition labels (the Non-Reading Group) and the group that did not know about them (the Not-Knowing Group). The prevalence of MetS was 16.8{\%} in the Reading Group, 27.2{\%} in the Non-Reading Group, and 47.3{\%} in the Not-Knowing Group. In comparison to participants in the Reading Group, the odds ratios (95{\%} confidence interval) for MetS in the participants in the Non-Reading Group and Not-Knowing Group were 1.85 (1.60-2.14) and 4.44 (3.79-5.20), respectively, when not adjusted. The relationship between the use of nutrition labels and MetS remained statistically significant even after adjusting for covariates such as age, sex and socioeconomic status including household income and education level [1.27 (1.05-1.53) in the Non-Reading Group and 1.34 (1.05-1.70) in the Not-Knowing Group]. Conclusion: Reading nutrition labels appeared to be associated with a lower prevalence of MetS in a nationally representative sample of Korean adults.",
author = "Kang, {H. T.} and Shim, {J. Y.} and Yongjae Lee and Linton, {J. A.} and Park, {B. J.} and Lee, {H. R.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.numecd.2012.06.007",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "876--882",
journal = "Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases",
issn = "0939-4753",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "9",

}

Reading nutrition labels is associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome in Korean adults : The 2007-2008 Korean NHANES. / Kang, H. T.; Shim, J. Y.; Lee, Yongjae; Linton, J. A.; Park, B. J.; Lee, H. R.

In: Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, Vol. 23, No. 9, 01.01.2013, p. 876-882.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reading nutrition labels is associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome in Korean adults

T2 - The 2007-2008 Korean NHANES

AU - Kang, H. T.

AU - Shim, J. Y.

AU - Lee, Yongjae

AU - Linton, J. A.

AU - Park, B. J.

AU - Lee, H. R.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Background and aims: Several studies demonstrated that reading nutrition labels was associated with healthier food choices, despite some controversy. This study investigated the association between the use of nutrition labels and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in Korean adults. Methods and results: This cross-sectional study included 7756 individuals who participated in the 2007-2009 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). A self-reported questionnaire was used to determine participant's awareness of nutrition labels. Modified Asian criteria based on a harmonizing definition of MetS were adopted. Individuals in the group that read nutrition labels (the Reading Group) were youngest and leanest, but their daily caloric intake fell between that of the group that did not read nutrition labels (the Non-Reading Group) and the group that did not know about them (the Not-Knowing Group). The prevalence of MetS was 16.8% in the Reading Group, 27.2% in the Non-Reading Group, and 47.3% in the Not-Knowing Group. In comparison to participants in the Reading Group, the odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for MetS in the participants in the Non-Reading Group and Not-Knowing Group were 1.85 (1.60-2.14) and 4.44 (3.79-5.20), respectively, when not adjusted. The relationship between the use of nutrition labels and MetS remained statistically significant even after adjusting for covariates such as age, sex and socioeconomic status including household income and education level [1.27 (1.05-1.53) in the Non-Reading Group and 1.34 (1.05-1.70) in the Not-Knowing Group]. Conclusion: Reading nutrition labels appeared to be associated with a lower prevalence of MetS in a nationally representative sample of Korean adults.

AB - Background and aims: Several studies demonstrated that reading nutrition labels was associated with healthier food choices, despite some controversy. This study investigated the association between the use of nutrition labels and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in Korean adults. Methods and results: This cross-sectional study included 7756 individuals who participated in the 2007-2009 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). A self-reported questionnaire was used to determine participant's awareness of nutrition labels. Modified Asian criteria based on a harmonizing definition of MetS were adopted. Individuals in the group that read nutrition labels (the Reading Group) were youngest and leanest, but their daily caloric intake fell between that of the group that did not read nutrition labels (the Non-Reading Group) and the group that did not know about them (the Not-Knowing Group). The prevalence of MetS was 16.8% in the Reading Group, 27.2% in the Non-Reading Group, and 47.3% in the Not-Knowing Group. In comparison to participants in the Reading Group, the odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for MetS in the participants in the Non-Reading Group and Not-Knowing Group were 1.85 (1.60-2.14) and 4.44 (3.79-5.20), respectively, when not adjusted. The relationship between the use of nutrition labels and MetS remained statistically significant even after adjusting for covariates such as age, sex and socioeconomic status including household income and education level [1.27 (1.05-1.53) in the Non-Reading Group and 1.34 (1.05-1.70) in the Not-Knowing Group]. Conclusion: Reading nutrition labels appeared to be associated with a lower prevalence of MetS in a nationally representative sample of Korean adults.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884144566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884144566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.numecd.2012.06.007

DO - 10.1016/j.numecd.2012.06.007

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 876

EP - 882

JO - Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases

JF - Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases

SN - 0939-4753

IS - 9

ER -