Reciprocation under status ambiguity

How dominance motives and spread of status value shape gift exchange

Patrick S. Park, Yong-Hak Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

How does status ambiguity affect reciprocation in gift exchange? We argue that actors in an exchange relationship delay reciprocation as a means of subtly claiming dominance when relative status is ambiguous. Using a two-step link-tracing sample of gift exchange dyads from an online social network site in the early days of social media, we analyze the probability of two-way exchange dyads and the timing of reciprocation while accounting for the nested and autocorrelated data structure. The results support the predicted inverted-U shape relationship between the hazard of reciprocation and status difference. This pattern is strongest when actors lack common foci of interaction from which relative status could be gauged accurately. In addition, a higher status individual tends to delay reciprocation longer than a lower-status individual, a finding consistent with the status competition explanation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)142-156
Number of pages15
JournalSocial Networks
Volume48
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Gift Giving
gift
dyad
Social Media
social media
Social Support
Values
social network
lack
interaction

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{680c5f5b8b55490091854d87df42abd4,
title = "Reciprocation under status ambiguity: How dominance motives and spread of status value shape gift exchange",
abstract = "How does status ambiguity affect reciprocation in gift exchange? We argue that actors in an exchange relationship delay reciprocation as a means of subtly claiming dominance when relative status is ambiguous. Using a two-step link-tracing sample of gift exchange dyads from an online social network site in the early days of social media, we analyze the probability of two-way exchange dyads and the timing of reciprocation while accounting for the nested and autocorrelated data structure. The results support the predicted inverted-U shape relationship between the hazard of reciprocation and status difference. This pattern is strongest when actors lack common foci of interaction from which relative status could be gauged accurately. In addition, a higher status individual tends to delay reciprocation longer than a lower-status individual, a finding consistent with the status competition explanation.",
author = "Park, {Patrick S.} and Yong-Hak Kim",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socnet.2016.08.004",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "142--156",
journal = "Social Networks",
issn = "0378-8733",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Reciprocation under status ambiguity : How dominance motives and spread of status value shape gift exchange. / Park, Patrick S.; Kim, Yong-Hak.

In: Social Networks, Vol. 48, 01.01.2017, p. 142-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reciprocation under status ambiguity

T2 - How dominance motives and spread of status value shape gift exchange

AU - Park, Patrick S.

AU - Kim, Yong-Hak

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - How does status ambiguity affect reciprocation in gift exchange? We argue that actors in an exchange relationship delay reciprocation as a means of subtly claiming dominance when relative status is ambiguous. Using a two-step link-tracing sample of gift exchange dyads from an online social network site in the early days of social media, we analyze the probability of two-way exchange dyads and the timing of reciprocation while accounting for the nested and autocorrelated data structure. The results support the predicted inverted-U shape relationship between the hazard of reciprocation and status difference. This pattern is strongest when actors lack common foci of interaction from which relative status could be gauged accurately. In addition, a higher status individual tends to delay reciprocation longer than a lower-status individual, a finding consistent with the status competition explanation.

AB - How does status ambiguity affect reciprocation in gift exchange? We argue that actors in an exchange relationship delay reciprocation as a means of subtly claiming dominance when relative status is ambiguous. Using a two-step link-tracing sample of gift exchange dyads from an online social network site in the early days of social media, we analyze the probability of two-way exchange dyads and the timing of reciprocation while accounting for the nested and autocorrelated data structure. The results support the predicted inverted-U shape relationship between the hazard of reciprocation and status difference. This pattern is strongest when actors lack common foci of interaction from which relative status could be gauged accurately. In addition, a higher status individual tends to delay reciprocation longer than a lower-status individual, a finding consistent with the status competition explanation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986575615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986575615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socnet.2016.08.004

DO - 10.1016/j.socnet.2016.08.004

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 142

EP - 156

JO - Social Networks

JF - Social Networks

SN - 0378-8733

ER -