Recruitment source practices in foreign and local firms: a comparative study in Japan

Vesa Peltokorpi, Fabian Jintae Froese

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While an important human resource management (HRM) function, little is known about the differences in recruitment source practices in foreign and local firms. Research on recruitment source practices is also important due to the potential HRM differences between foreign and local firms. To partially bridge this research gap, we conducted two studies to examine differences in recruitment source practices in foreign and local firms in Japan and the reasons that explain these differences. First, we conducted a qualitative, interview-based study with 110 employees and recruitment consultants and found that not only firm ownership (foreign firm versus local firm) but also firm age, size, and industry explain differences in recruiting source practices. Second, we conducted a quantitative, survey-based study with 800 employees in foreign and local firms to further examine contingencies in recruitment source practices. We found that foreign firms rely more on recruitment consultants but less on college recruiting, and that firm size and industry moderate the relationship between firm ownership and recruiting source practices. Taken together, our findings contribute to international HRM research by suggesting that not only firm ownership, but also firm size and industry influence recruiting source practices in foreign and local firms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)421-444
Number of pages24
JournalAsia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
Volume54
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Oct 1

Fingerprint

Comparative study
Japan
Recruiting
Firm ownership
Industry
Firm size
Employees
Consultants
Foreign firms
Human resource management
International human resource management
Human resource management research
Firm age
Contingency

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

@article{eb58920d53e54943945cdc0984c24cde,
title = "Recruitment source practices in foreign and local firms: a comparative study in Japan",
abstract = "While an important human resource management (HRM) function, little is known about the differences in recruitment source practices in foreign and local firms. Research on recruitment source practices is also important due to the potential HRM differences between foreign and local firms. To partially bridge this research gap, we conducted two studies to examine differences in recruitment source practices in foreign and local firms in Japan and the reasons that explain these differences. First, we conducted a qualitative, interview-based study with 110 employees and recruitment consultants and found that not only firm ownership (foreign firm versus local firm) but also firm age, size, and industry explain differences in recruiting source practices. Second, we conducted a quantitative, survey-based study with 800 employees in foreign and local firms to further examine contingencies in recruitment source practices. We found that foreign firms rely more on recruitment consultants but less on college recruiting, and that firm size and industry moderate the relationship between firm ownership and recruiting source practices. Taken together, our findings contribute to international HRM research by suggesting that not only firm ownership, but also firm size and industry influence recruiting source practices in foreign and local firms.",
author = "Vesa Peltokorpi and {Jintae Froese}, Fabian",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1744-7941.12076",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "421--444",
journal = "Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources",
issn = "1038-4111",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Recruitment source practices in foreign and local firms : a comparative study in Japan. / Peltokorpi, Vesa; Jintae Froese, Fabian.

In: Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 54, No. 4, 01.10.2016, p. 421-444.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recruitment source practices in foreign and local firms

T2 - a comparative study in Japan

AU - Peltokorpi, Vesa

AU - Jintae Froese, Fabian

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - While an important human resource management (HRM) function, little is known about the differences in recruitment source practices in foreign and local firms. Research on recruitment source practices is also important due to the potential HRM differences between foreign and local firms. To partially bridge this research gap, we conducted two studies to examine differences in recruitment source practices in foreign and local firms in Japan and the reasons that explain these differences. First, we conducted a qualitative, interview-based study with 110 employees and recruitment consultants and found that not only firm ownership (foreign firm versus local firm) but also firm age, size, and industry explain differences in recruiting source practices. Second, we conducted a quantitative, survey-based study with 800 employees in foreign and local firms to further examine contingencies in recruitment source practices. We found that foreign firms rely more on recruitment consultants but less on college recruiting, and that firm size and industry moderate the relationship between firm ownership and recruiting source practices. Taken together, our findings contribute to international HRM research by suggesting that not only firm ownership, but also firm size and industry influence recruiting source practices in foreign and local firms.

AB - While an important human resource management (HRM) function, little is known about the differences in recruitment source practices in foreign and local firms. Research on recruitment source practices is also important due to the potential HRM differences between foreign and local firms. To partially bridge this research gap, we conducted two studies to examine differences in recruitment source practices in foreign and local firms in Japan and the reasons that explain these differences. First, we conducted a qualitative, interview-based study with 110 employees and recruitment consultants and found that not only firm ownership (foreign firm versus local firm) but also firm age, size, and industry explain differences in recruiting source practices. Second, we conducted a quantitative, survey-based study with 800 employees in foreign and local firms to further examine contingencies in recruitment source practices. We found that foreign firms rely more on recruitment consultants but less on college recruiting, and that firm size and industry moderate the relationship between firm ownership and recruiting source practices. Taken together, our findings contribute to international HRM research by suggesting that not only firm ownership, but also firm size and industry influence recruiting source practices in foreign and local firms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937690797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937690797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1744-7941.12076

DO - 10.1111/1744-7941.12076

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84937690797

VL - 54

SP - 421

EP - 444

JO - Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources

JF - Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources

SN - 1038-4111

IS - 4

ER -