Regulating recognition decisions through incremental reinforcement learning

Sanghoon Han, Ian G. Dobbins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Does incremental reinforcement learning influence recognition memory judgments? We examined this question by subtly altering the relative validity or availability of feedback in order to differentially reinforce old or new recognition judgments. Experiment 1 probabilistically and incorrectly indicated that either misses or false alarms were correct in the context of feedback that was otherwise accurate. Experiment 2 selectively withheld feedback for either misses or false alarms in the context of feedback that was otherwise present. Both manipulations caused prominent shifts of recognition memory decision criteria that remained for considerable periods even after feedback had been altogether removed. Overall, these data demonstrate that incremental reinforcement-learning mechanisms influence the degree of caution subjects exercise when evaluating explicit memories.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)469-474
Number of pages6
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Jun 1

Fingerprint

Learning
Recognition (Psychology)
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Reinforcement Learning
Recognition Memory
Experiment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{04e3dacbbb5641fbbe5577690abf7f31,
title = "Regulating recognition decisions through incremental reinforcement learning",
abstract = "Does incremental reinforcement learning influence recognition memory judgments? We examined this question by subtly altering the relative validity or availability of feedback in order to differentially reinforce old or new recognition judgments. Experiment 1 probabilistically and incorrectly indicated that either misses or false alarms were correct in the context of feedback that was otherwise accurate. Experiment 2 selectively withheld feedback for either misses or false alarms in the context of feedback that was otherwise present. Both manipulations caused prominent shifts of recognition memory decision criteria that remained for considerable periods even after feedback had been altogether removed. Overall, these data demonstrate that incremental reinforcement-learning mechanisms influence the degree of caution subjects exercise when evaluating explicit memories.",
author = "Sanghoon Han and Dobbins, {Ian G.}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/PBR.16.3.469",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "469--474",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

Regulating recognition decisions through incremental reinforcement learning. / Han, Sanghoon; Dobbins, Ian G.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 16, No. 3, 01.06.2009, p. 469-474.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulating recognition decisions through incremental reinforcement learning

AU - Han, Sanghoon

AU - Dobbins, Ian G.

PY - 2009/6/1

Y1 - 2009/6/1

N2 - Does incremental reinforcement learning influence recognition memory judgments? We examined this question by subtly altering the relative validity or availability of feedback in order to differentially reinforce old or new recognition judgments. Experiment 1 probabilistically and incorrectly indicated that either misses or false alarms were correct in the context of feedback that was otherwise accurate. Experiment 2 selectively withheld feedback for either misses or false alarms in the context of feedback that was otherwise present. Both manipulations caused prominent shifts of recognition memory decision criteria that remained for considerable periods even after feedback had been altogether removed. Overall, these data demonstrate that incremental reinforcement-learning mechanisms influence the degree of caution subjects exercise when evaluating explicit memories.

AB - Does incremental reinforcement learning influence recognition memory judgments? We examined this question by subtly altering the relative validity or availability of feedback in order to differentially reinforce old or new recognition judgments. Experiment 1 probabilistically and incorrectly indicated that either misses or false alarms were correct in the context of feedback that was otherwise accurate. Experiment 2 selectively withheld feedback for either misses or false alarms in the context of feedback that was otherwise present. Both manipulations caused prominent shifts of recognition memory decision criteria that remained for considerable periods even after feedback had been altogether removed. Overall, these data demonstrate that incremental reinforcement-learning mechanisms influence the degree of caution subjects exercise when evaluating explicit memories.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650567289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650567289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/PBR.16.3.469

DO - 10.3758/PBR.16.3.469

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 469

EP - 474

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 3

ER -