Reliability of assessing postural control during seated balancing using a physical human-robot interaction

Ahmed Ramadan, Jacek Cholewicki, Clark J. Radcliffe, John M. Popovich, N. Peter Reeves, Jongeun Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study evaluated the within- and between-visit reliability of a seated balance test for quantifying trunk motor control using input–output data. Thirty healthy subjects performed a seated balance test under three conditions: eyes open (EO), eyes closed (EC), and eyes closed with vibration to the lumbar muscles (VIB). Each subject performed three trials of each condition on three different visits. The seated balance test utilized a torque-controlled robotic seat, which together with a sitting subject resulted in a physical human-robot interaction (pHRI) (two degrees-of-freedom with upper and lower body rotations). Subjects balanced the pHRI by controlling trunk rotation in response to pseudorandom torque perturbations applied to the seat in the coronal plane. Performance error was expressed as the root mean square (RMSE) of deviations from the upright position in the time domain and as the mean bandpass signal energy (Emb) in the frequency domain. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) quantified the between-visit reliability of both RMSE and Emb. The empirical transfer function estimates (ETFE) from the perturbation input to each of the two rotational outputs were calculated. Coefficients of multiple correlation (CMC) quantified the within- and between-visit reliability of the averaged ETFE. ICCs of RMSE and Emb for all conditions were ≥0.84. The mean within- and between-visit CMCs were all ≥0.96 for the lower body rotation and ≥0.89 for the upper body rotation. Therefore, our seated balance test consisting of pHRI to assess coronal plane trunk motor control is reliable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)198-205
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
Volume64
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Nov 7

Fingerprint

Human robot interaction
Torque
Seats
Transfer functions
Degrees of freedom (mechanics)
Robotics
Vibration
Muscle
Healthy Volunteers
Muscles

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Ramadan, Ahmed ; Cholewicki, Jacek ; Radcliffe, Clark J. ; Popovich, John M. ; Reeves, N. Peter ; Choi, Jongeun. / Reliability of assessing postural control during seated balancing using a physical human-robot interaction. In: Journal of Biomechanics. 2017 ; Vol. 64. pp. 198-205.
@article{9eb5aaf732db4cfc874abf69430adc9c,
title = "Reliability of assessing postural control during seated balancing using a physical human-robot interaction",
abstract = "This study evaluated the within- and between-visit reliability of a seated balance test for quantifying trunk motor control using input–output data. Thirty healthy subjects performed a seated balance test under three conditions: eyes open (EO), eyes closed (EC), and eyes closed with vibration to the lumbar muscles (VIB). Each subject performed three trials of each condition on three different visits. The seated balance test utilized a torque-controlled robotic seat, which together with a sitting subject resulted in a physical human-robot interaction (pHRI) (two degrees-of-freedom with upper and lower body rotations). Subjects balanced the pHRI by controlling trunk rotation in response to pseudorandom torque perturbations applied to the seat in the coronal plane. Performance error was expressed as the root mean square (RMSE) of deviations from the upright position in the time domain and as the mean bandpass signal energy (Emb) in the frequency domain. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) quantified the between-visit reliability of both RMSE and Emb. The empirical transfer function estimates (ETFE) from the perturbation input to each of the two rotational outputs were calculated. Coefficients of multiple correlation (CMC) quantified the within- and between-visit reliability of the averaged ETFE. ICCs of RMSE and Emb for all conditions were ≥0.84. The mean within- and between-visit CMCs were all ≥0.96 for the lower body rotation and ≥0.89 for the upper body rotation. Therefore, our seated balance test consisting of pHRI to assess coronal plane trunk motor control is reliable.",
author = "Ahmed Ramadan and Jacek Cholewicki and Radcliffe, {Clark J.} and Popovich, {John M.} and Reeves, {N. Peter} and Jongeun Choi",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.09.036",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "198--205",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanics",
issn = "0021-9290",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Reliability of assessing postural control during seated balancing using a physical human-robot interaction. / Ramadan, Ahmed; Cholewicki, Jacek; Radcliffe, Clark J.; Popovich, John M.; Reeves, N. Peter; Choi, Jongeun.

In: Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 64, 07.11.2017, p. 198-205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of assessing postural control during seated balancing using a physical human-robot interaction

AU - Ramadan, Ahmed

AU - Cholewicki, Jacek

AU - Radcliffe, Clark J.

AU - Popovich, John M.

AU - Reeves, N. Peter

AU - Choi, Jongeun

PY - 2017/11/7

Y1 - 2017/11/7

N2 - This study evaluated the within- and between-visit reliability of a seated balance test for quantifying trunk motor control using input–output data. Thirty healthy subjects performed a seated balance test under three conditions: eyes open (EO), eyes closed (EC), and eyes closed with vibration to the lumbar muscles (VIB). Each subject performed three trials of each condition on three different visits. The seated balance test utilized a torque-controlled robotic seat, which together with a sitting subject resulted in a physical human-robot interaction (pHRI) (two degrees-of-freedom with upper and lower body rotations). Subjects balanced the pHRI by controlling trunk rotation in response to pseudorandom torque perturbations applied to the seat in the coronal plane. Performance error was expressed as the root mean square (RMSE) of deviations from the upright position in the time domain and as the mean bandpass signal energy (Emb) in the frequency domain. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) quantified the between-visit reliability of both RMSE and Emb. The empirical transfer function estimates (ETFE) from the perturbation input to each of the two rotational outputs were calculated. Coefficients of multiple correlation (CMC) quantified the within- and between-visit reliability of the averaged ETFE. ICCs of RMSE and Emb for all conditions were ≥0.84. The mean within- and between-visit CMCs were all ≥0.96 for the lower body rotation and ≥0.89 for the upper body rotation. Therefore, our seated balance test consisting of pHRI to assess coronal plane trunk motor control is reliable.

AB - This study evaluated the within- and between-visit reliability of a seated balance test for quantifying trunk motor control using input–output data. Thirty healthy subjects performed a seated balance test under three conditions: eyes open (EO), eyes closed (EC), and eyes closed with vibration to the lumbar muscles (VIB). Each subject performed three trials of each condition on three different visits. The seated balance test utilized a torque-controlled robotic seat, which together with a sitting subject resulted in a physical human-robot interaction (pHRI) (two degrees-of-freedom with upper and lower body rotations). Subjects balanced the pHRI by controlling trunk rotation in response to pseudorandom torque perturbations applied to the seat in the coronal plane. Performance error was expressed as the root mean square (RMSE) of deviations from the upright position in the time domain and as the mean bandpass signal energy (Emb) in the frequency domain. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) quantified the between-visit reliability of both RMSE and Emb. The empirical transfer function estimates (ETFE) from the perturbation input to each of the two rotational outputs were calculated. Coefficients of multiple correlation (CMC) quantified the within- and between-visit reliability of the averaged ETFE. ICCs of RMSE and Emb for all conditions were ≥0.84. The mean within- and between-visit CMCs were all ≥0.96 for the lower body rotation and ≥0.89 for the upper body rotation. Therefore, our seated balance test consisting of pHRI to assess coronal plane trunk motor control is reliable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031782072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031782072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.09.036

DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.09.036

M3 - Article

C2 - 29066244

AN - SCOPUS:85031782072

VL - 64

SP - 198

EP - 205

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

SN - 0021-9290

ER -