Reliability of assessing trunk motor control using position and force tracking and stabilization tasks

N. Peter Reeves, John M. Popovich, M. Cody Priess, Jacek Cholewicki, Jongeun Choi, Clark J. Radcliffe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

System-based methods have been applied to assess trunk motor control in people with and without back pain, although the reliability of these methods has yet to be established. Therefore, the goal of this study was to quantify within- and between-day reliability using systems-based methods involving position and force tracking and stabilization tasks. Ten healthy subjects performed six tasks, involving tracking and stabilizing of trunk angular position in the sagittal plane, and trunk flexion and extension force. Tracking tasks involved following a one-dimensional, time-varying input signal displayed on a screen by changing trunk position (position tracking) or trunk force (force tracking). Stabilization tasks involved maintaining a constant trunk position (position stabilization) or constant trunk force (force stabilization) while a sagittal plane disturbance input was applied to the pelvis using a robotic platform. Time and frequency domain assessments of error (root mean square and H2 norm, respectively) were computed for each task on two separate days. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) for error and coefficients of multiple correlations (CMC) for frequency response curves were used to quantify reliability of each task. Reliability for all tasks was excellent (between-day ICC≥0.8 and CMC>0.75, within-day CMC>0.85). Therefore, position and force control tasks used to assess trunk motor control can be deemed reliable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-49
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
Volume47
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jan 3

Fingerprint

Force control
Position control
Stabilization
Robotics
Advisory Committees
Back Pain
Pelvis
Healthy Volunteers
Frequency response

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Biophysics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Reeves, N. Peter ; Popovich, John M. ; Priess, M. Cody ; Cholewicki, Jacek ; Choi, Jongeun ; Radcliffe, Clark J. / Reliability of assessing trunk motor control using position and force tracking and stabilization tasks. In: Journal of Biomechanics. 2014 ; Vol. 47, No. 1. pp. 44-49.
@article{de5bab6cbb644e44a9866394a50ccfc8,
title = "Reliability of assessing trunk motor control using position and force tracking and stabilization tasks",
abstract = "System-based methods have been applied to assess trunk motor control in people with and without back pain, although the reliability of these methods has yet to be established. Therefore, the goal of this study was to quantify within- and between-day reliability using systems-based methods involving position and force tracking and stabilization tasks. Ten healthy subjects performed six tasks, involving tracking and stabilizing of trunk angular position in the sagittal plane, and trunk flexion and extension force. Tracking tasks involved following a one-dimensional, time-varying input signal displayed on a screen by changing trunk position (position tracking) or trunk force (force tracking). Stabilization tasks involved maintaining a constant trunk position (position stabilization) or constant trunk force (force stabilization) while a sagittal plane disturbance input was applied to the pelvis using a robotic platform. Time and frequency domain assessments of error (root mean square and H2 norm, respectively) were computed for each task on two separate days. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) for error and coefficients of multiple correlations (CMC) for frequency response curves were used to quantify reliability of each task. Reliability for all tasks was excellent (between-day ICC≥0.8 and CMC>0.75, within-day CMC>0.85). Therefore, position and force control tasks used to assess trunk motor control can be deemed reliable.",
author = "Reeves, {N. Peter} and Popovich, {John M.} and Priess, {M. Cody} and Jacek Cholewicki and Jongeun Choi and Radcliffe, {Clark J.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.018",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "44--49",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanics",
issn = "0021-9290",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

Reliability of assessing trunk motor control using position and force tracking and stabilization tasks. / Reeves, N. Peter; Popovich, John M.; Priess, M. Cody; Cholewicki, Jacek; Choi, Jongeun; Radcliffe, Clark J.

In: Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 47, No. 1, 03.01.2014, p. 44-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of assessing trunk motor control using position and force tracking and stabilization tasks

AU - Reeves, N. Peter

AU - Popovich, John M.

AU - Priess, M. Cody

AU - Cholewicki, Jacek

AU - Choi, Jongeun

AU - Radcliffe, Clark J.

PY - 2014/1/3

Y1 - 2014/1/3

N2 - System-based methods have been applied to assess trunk motor control in people with and without back pain, although the reliability of these methods has yet to be established. Therefore, the goal of this study was to quantify within- and between-day reliability using systems-based methods involving position and force tracking and stabilization tasks. Ten healthy subjects performed six tasks, involving tracking and stabilizing of trunk angular position in the sagittal plane, and trunk flexion and extension force. Tracking tasks involved following a one-dimensional, time-varying input signal displayed on a screen by changing trunk position (position tracking) or trunk force (force tracking). Stabilization tasks involved maintaining a constant trunk position (position stabilization) or constant trunk force (force stabilization) while a sagittal plane disturbance input was applied to the pelvis using a robotic platform. Time and frequency domain assessments of error (root mean square and H2 norm, respectively) were computed for each task on two separate days. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) for error and coefficients of multiple correlations (CMC) for frequency response curves were used to quantify reliability of each task. Reliability for all tasks was excellent (between-day ICC≥0.8 and CMC>0.75, within-day CMC>0.85). Therefore, position and force control tasks used to assess trunk motor control can be deemed reliable.

AB - System-based methods have been applied to assess trunk motor control in people with and without back pain, although the reliability of these methods has yet to be established. Therefore, the goal of this study was to quantify within- and between-day reliability using systems-based methods involving position and force tracking and stabilization tasks. Ten healthy subjects performed six tasks, involving tracking and stabilizing of trunk angular position in the sagittal plane, and trunk flexion and extension force. Tracking tasks involved following a one-dimensional, time-varying input signal displayed on a screen by changing trunk position (position tracking) or trunk force (force tracking). Stabilization tasks involved maintaining a constant trunk position (position stabilization) or constant trunk force (force stabilization) while a sagittal plane disturbance input was applied to the pelvis using a robotic platform. Time and frequency domain assessments of error (root mean square and H2 norm, respectively) were computed for each task on two separate days. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) for error and coefficients of multiple correlations (CMC) for frequency response curves were used to quantify reliability of each task. Reliability for all tasks was excellent (between-day ICC≥0.8 and CMC>0.75, within-day CMC>0.85). Therefore, position and force control tasks used to assess trunk motor control can be deemed reliable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890856750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890856750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.018

DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 24262851

AN - SCOPUS:84890856750

VL - 47

SP - 44

EP - 49

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

SN - 0021-9290

IS - 1

ER -