Repeat decompression and fusions following posterolateral fusion versus posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylosis

a national database study

Moon Soo Park, Young Su Ju, seonghwan moon, Tae Hwan Kim, Jae Keun Oh, Jin Kyu Lim, Chi Heon Kim, Chun Kee Chung, Ho Guen Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There is a low incidence of reoperation after surgery. It is difficult to detect statistical differences between reoperation rates of different lumbar fusion surgeries. National population-based databases provide large, longitudinally followed cohorts that may help overcome this challenge. The purpose is to compare the repeat decompression and fusion rate after surgery for degenerative lumbar diseases according to different surgical fusion procedures based on national population-based databases and elucidate the risk factor for repeat decompression and fusions. The Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service database was used. Patients diagnosed with degenerative lumbar diseases and who underwent single-level fusion surgeries between January 1, 2011, and June 30, 2016, were included. They were divided into two groups based on procedure codes: posterolateral fusion or posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The primary endpoint was repeat decompression and fusion. Age, sex, the presence of diabetes, osteoporosis, associated comorbidities, and hospital types were considered potential confounding factors. The repeat decompression and fusion rate was not different between the patients who underwent posterolateral fusion and those who underwent posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Old age, male sex, and hospital type were noted to be risk factors. The incidence of repeat decompression and fusion was independent on the fusion method.

Original languageEnglish
Article number4926
JournalScientific reports
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Spondylosis
Decompression
Databases
Reoperation
Incidence
Health Insurance
Population
Osteoporosis
Comorbidity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General

Cite this

Park, Moon Soo ; Ju, Young Su ; moon, seonghwan ; Kim, Tae Hwan ; Oh, Jae Keun ; Lim, Jin Kyu ; Kim, Chi Heon ; Chung, Chun Kee ; Chang, Ho Guen. / Repeat decompression and fusions following posterolateral fusion versus posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylosis : a national database study. In: Scientific reports. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 1.
@article{dd0a6011abdf407c9aafd86d8b88634a,
title = "Repeat decompression and fusions following posterolateral fusion versus posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylosis: a national database study",
abstract = "There is a low incidence of reoperation after surgery. It is difficult to detect statistical differences between reoperation rates of different lumbar fusion surgeries. National population-based databases provide large, longitudinally followed cohorts that may help overcome this challenge. The purpose is to compare the repeat decompression and fusion rate after surgery for degenerative lumbar diseases according to different surgical fusion procedures based on national population-based databases and elucidate the risk factor for repeat decompression and fusions. The Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service database was used. Patients diagnosed with degenerative lumbar diseases and who underwent single-level fusion surgeries between January 1, 2011, and June 30, 2016, were included. They were divided into two groups based on procedure codes: posterolateral fusion or posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The primary endpoint was repeat decompression and fusion. Age, sex, the presence of diabetes, osteoporosis, associated comorbidities, and hospital types were considered potential confounding factors. The repeat decompression and fusion rate was not different between the patients who underwent posterolateral fusion and those who underwent posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Old age, male sex, and hospital type were noted to be risk factors. The incidence of repeat decompression and fusion was independent on the fusion method.",
author = "Park, {Moon Soo} and Ju, {Young Su} and seonghwan moon and Kim, {Tae Hwan} and Oh, {Jae Keun} and Lim, {Jin Kyu} and Kim, {Chi Heon} and Chung, {Chun Kee} and Chang, {Ho Guen}",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-019-41366-z",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

Repeat decompression and fusions following posterolateral fusion versus posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylosis : a national database study. / Park, Moon Soo; Ju, Young Su; moon, seonghwan; Kim, Tae Hwan; Oh, Jae Keun; Lim, Jin Kyu; Kim, Chi Heon; Chung, Chun Kee; Chang, Ho Guen.

In: Scientific reports, Vol. 9, No. 1, 4926, 01.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repeat decompression and fusions following posterolateral fusion versus posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylosis

T2 - a national database study

AU - Park, Moon Soo

AU - Ju, Young Su

AU - moon, seonghwan

AU - Kim, Tae Hwan

AU - Oh, Jae Keun

AU - Lim, Jin Kyu

AU - Kim, Chi Heon

AU - Chung, Chun Kee

AU - Chang, Ho Guen

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - There is a low incidence of reoperation after surgery. It is difficult to detect statistical differences between reoperation rates of different lumbar fusion surgeries. National population-based databases provide large, longitudinally followed cohorts that may help overcome this challenge. The purpose is to compare the repeat decompression and fusion rate after surgery for degenerative lumbar diseases according to different surgical fusion procedures based on national population-based databases and elucidate the risk factor for repeat decompression and fusions. The Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service database was used. Patients diagnosed with degenerative lumbar diseases and who underwent single-level fusion surgeries between January 1, 2011, and June 30, 2016, were included. They were divided into two groups based on procedure codes: posterolateral fusion or posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The primary endpoint was repeat decompression and fusion. Age, sex, the presence of diabetes, osteoporosis, associated comorbidities, and hospital types were considered potential confounding factors. The repeat decompression and fusion rate was not different between the patients who underwent posterolateral fusion and those who underwent posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Old age, male sex, and hospital type were noted to be risk factors. The incidence of repeat decompression and fusion was independent on the fusion method.

AB - There is a low incidence of reoperation after surgery. It is difficult to detect statistical differences between reoperation rates of different lumbar fusion surgeries. National population-based databases provide large, longitudinally followed cohorts that may help overcome this challenge. The purpose is to compare the repeat decompression and fusion rate after surgery for degenerative lumbar diseases according to different surgical fusion procedures based on national population-based databases and elucidate the risk factor for repeat decompression and fusions. The Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service database was used. Patients diagnosed with degenerative lumbar diseases and who underwent single-level fusion surgeries between January 1, 2011, and June 30, 2016, were included. They were divided into two groups based on procedure codes: posterolateral fusion or posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The primary endpoint was repeat decompression and fusion. Age, sex, the presence of diabetes, osteoporosis, associated comorbidities, and hospital types were considered potential confounding factors. The repeat decompression and fusion rate was not different between the patients who underwent posterolateral fusion and those who underwent posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Old age, male sex, and hospital type were noted to be risk factors. The incidence of repeat decompression and fusion was independent on the fusion method.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063339744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063339744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-019-41366-z

DO - 10.1038/s41598-019-41366-z

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

IS - 1

M1 - 4926

ER -