Abstract
The preceding comment by Mazin et al. on our work makes two claims: (1) the calculated variations of the superconducting energy gap within the σ or the π bands are not observable in real samples due to scatterings, and (2) the Coulomb repulsion μ(k, k’) is negligibly small between σ and π states and thus should be approximated by a diagonal 2 × matrix in the σ and π channels. Here, we point out that the former does not affect the validity of our theoretical work, which is for the clean limit, and that the latter is based on an oversimplified estimation of μ.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2004 Feb 6 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Condensed Matter Physics
Cite this
}
Reply to “Comment on ‘First-principles calculation of the superconducting transition in MgB2 within the anisotropic Eliashberg formalism’”. / Choi, Hyoung Joon; Roundy, David; Sun, Hong; Cohen, Marvin L.; Louie, Steven G.
In: Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, Vol. 69, No. 5, 06.02.2004.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Reply to “Comment on ‘First-principles calculation of the superconducting transition in MgB2 within the anisotropic Eliashberg formalism’”
AU - Choi, Hyoung Joon
AU - Roundy, David
AU - Sun, Hong
AU - Cohen, Marvin L.
AU - Louie, Steven G.
PY - 2004/2/6
Y1 - 2004/2/6
N2 - The preceding comment by Mazin et al. on our work makes two claims: (1) the calculated variations of the superconducting energy gap within the σ or the π bands are not observable in real samples due to scatterings, and (2) the Coulomb repulsion μ(k, k’) is negligibly small between σ and π states and thus should be approximated by a diagonal 2 × matrix in the σ and π channels. Here, we point out that the former does not affect the validity of our theoretical work, which is for the clean limit, and that the latter is based on an oversimplified estimation of μ.
AB - The preceding comment by Mazin et al. on our work makes two claims: (1) the calculated variations of the superconducting energy gap within the σ or the π bands are not observable in real samples due to scatterings, and (2) the Coulomb repulsion μ(k, k’) is negligibly small between σ and π states and thus should be approximated by a diagonal 2 × matrix in the σ and π channels. Here, we point out that the former does not affect the validity of our theoretical work, which is for the clean limit, and that the latter is based on an oversimplified estimation of μ.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642385469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642385469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.056502
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.056502
M3 - Article
VL - 69
JO - Physical Review B-Condensed Matter
JF - Physical Review B-Condensed Matter
SN - 1098-0121
IS - 5
ER -