Reprint - Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children: A Cochrane review

Lenka Barreto, Jae Hung Jung, Ameera Abdelrahim, Munir Ahmed, Guy P.C. Dawkins, Marcin Kazmierski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: We performed systematic review to assess the effects of different medical and surgical management of urinary stones in children. Methods: We performed a comprehensive search using multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials), trials registries (World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal and ClinicalTrials. gov), and abstract proceedings of major urological and pediatric urology meetings, with no restrictions on the language of publication or publication status, up until December 2017. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias in accordance with the Cochrane “Risk of bias” tool. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and assessed the quality of the evidence according to GRADE. Results: We included 14 studies with a total of 978 randomized participants in our review, informing seven comparisons with shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, ureterorenoscopy (regardless of the type of lithotripsy), open stone surgery, and medical expulsive therapy. There was very low quality of evidence in the most comparisons with regards to the effectiveness and adverse events for the treatment of pediatric upper renal tract stone disease. Conclusions: Based on mostly very low-quality evidence for most comparisons and outcomes, we are uncertain about the effect of nearly all medical and surgical interventions to treat stone disease in children. There is a critical need for better-quality trials assessing patient-important outcomes in children with stone disease to inform future guidelines on the management of this condition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)334-341
Number of pages8
JournalCanadian Urological Association Journal
Volume13
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Urinary Calculi
Lithotripsy
Registries
Publications
Randomized Controlled Trials
Pediatrics
Urology
MEDLINE
Language
Therapeutics
Clinical Trials
Databases
Guidelines
Kidney

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Urology

Cite this

Barreto, Lenka ; Jung, Jae Hung ; Abdelrahim, Ameera ; Ahmed, Munir ; Dawkins, Guy P.C. ; Kazmierski, Marcin. / Reprint - Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children : A Cochrane review. In: Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2019 ; Vol. 13, No. 10. pp. 334-341.
@article{647cf58aa579408ea5aa2174c5d4d580,
title = "Reprint - Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children: A Cochrane review",
abstract = "Introduction: We performed systematic review to assess the effects of different medical and surgical management of urinary stones in children. Methods: We performed a comprehensive search using multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials), trials registries (World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal and ClinicalTrials. gov), and abstract proceedings of major urological and pediatric urology meetings, with no restrictions on the language of publication or publication status, up until December 2017. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias in accordance with the Cochrane “Risk of bias” tool. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and assessed the quality of the evidence according to GRADE. Results: We included 14 studies with a total of 978 randomized participants in our review, informing seven comparisons with shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, ureterorenoscopy (regardless of the type of lithotripsy), open stone surgery, and medical expulsive therapy. There was very low quality of evidence in the most comparisons with regards to the effectiveness and adverse events for the treatment of pediatric upper renal tract stone disease. Conclusions: Based on mostly very low-quality evidence for most comparisons and outcomes, we are uncertain about the effect of nearly all medical and surgical interventions to treat stone disease in children. There is a critical need for better-quality trials assessing patient-important outcomes in children with stone disease to inform future guidelines on the management of this condition.",
author = "Lenka Barreto and Jung, {Jae Hung} and Ameera Abdelrahim and Munir Ahmed and Dawkins, {Guy P.C.} and Marcin Kazmierski",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5489/cuaj.5787",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "334--341",
journal = "Canadian Urological Association Journal",
issn = "1920-1214",
publisher = "Canadian Urological Association",
number = "10",

}

Reprint - Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children : A Cochrane review. / Barreto, Lenka; Jung, Jae Hung; Abdelrahim, Ameera; Ahmed, Munir; Dawkins, Guy P.C.; Kazmierski, Marcin.

In: Canadian Urological Association Journal, Vol. 13, No. 10, 01.01.2019, p. 334-341.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reprint - Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children

T2 - A Cochrane review

AU - Barreto, Lenka

AU - Jung, Jae Hung

AU - Abdelrahim, Ameera

AU - Ahmed, Munir

AU - Dawkins, Guy P.C.

AU - Kazmierski, Marcin

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Introduction: We performed systematic review to assess the effects of different medical and surgical management of urinary stones in children. Methods: We performed a comprehensive search using multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials), trials registries (World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal and ClinicalTrials. gov), and abstract proceedings of major urological and pediatric urology meetings, with no restrictions on the language of publication or publication status, up until December 2017. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias in accordance with the Cochrane “Risk of bias” tool. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and assessed the quality of the evidence according to GRADE. Results: We included 14 studies with a total of 978 randomized participants in our review, informing seven comparisons with shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, ureterorenoscopy (regardless of the type of lithotripsy), open stone surgery, and medical expulsive therapy. There was very low quality of evidence in the most comparisons with regards to the effectiveness and adverse events for the treatment of pediatric upper renal tract stone disease. Conclusions: Based on mostly very low-quality evidence for most comparisons and outcomes, we are uncertain about the effect of nearly all medical and surgical interventions to treat stone disease in children. There is a critical need for better-quality trials assessing patient-important outcomes in children with stone disease to inform future guidelines on the management of this condition.

AB - Introduction: We performed systematic review to assess the effects of different medical and surgical management of urinary stones in children. Methods: We performed a comprehensive search using multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials), trials registries (World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal and ClinicalTrials. gov), and abstract proceedings of major urological and pediatric urology meetings, with no restrictions on the language of publication or publication status, up until December 2017. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias in accordance with the Cochrane “Risk of bias” tool. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and assessed the quality of the evidence according to GRADE. Results: We included 14 studies with a total of 978 randomized participants in our review, informing seven comparisons with shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, ureterorenoscopy (regardless of the type of lithotripsy), open stone surgery, and medical expulsive therapy. There was very low quality of evidence in the most comparisons with regards to the effectiveness and adverse events for the treatment of pediatric upper renal tract stone disease. Conclusions: Based on mostly very low-quality evidence for most comparisons and outcomes, we are uncertain about the effect of nearly all medical and surgical interventions to treat stone disease in children. There is a critical need for better-quality trials assessing patient-important outcomes in children with stone disease to inform future guidelines on the management of this condition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074269615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074269615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5489/cuaj.5787

DO - 10.5489/cuaj.5787

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074269615

VL - 13

SP - 334

EP - 341

JO - Canadian Urological Association Journal

JF - Canadian Urological Association Journal

SN - 1920-1214

IS - 10

ER -