Research on Patient Satisfaction of Robotic Telerounding: A Pilot Study in a Korean Population

Cheol Kyu Oh, Kwang Hyun Kim, Wooju Jeong, WoongKyu Han, KoonHo Rha, Bummo Ahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and functionality of robotic telerounding among Korean patients using the RP-7 robot system and a questionnaire survey comparing the results of robotic telerounding and standard rounding in Korean patients. Methods: A total of 40 patients who underwent urologic minimally invasive video-assisted minilaparotomy surgery, laparoscopic and robotic surgery, and endoscopic surgery were recruited. The patients were divided into 2 groups – telerounding (20) and standard rounding (20) – and underwent robotic telerounding and standard rounding. We assessed the patients using a 24-item questionnaire to evaluate the efficacy and functionality of their hospital care. Results: The hospital factors such as self-rated health, assistance, and pain control scores showed no statistically significant differences between groups. Patient satisfaction showed a statistically significant difference in MD confidence, medical communication, explanation understanding, explanation satisfaction, mutual communication, and mutual response. In the telerounding group, participants were satisfied with the audio and video qualities and believed that the robotic telerounding provided better care, and 85% of patients preferred telerounding in the absence of the attending physician. Conclusion: Robotic telerounding can provide efficient and cost-effective medical rounding by reducing inconvenience and labor cost with greater patient satisfaction with postoperative care. However, there is no statistically significant difference in the hospital factors and postoperative morbidity. In addition, the patients doubted that the robotic telerounding could replace standard rounding due to the Eastern culture.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-208
Number of pages4
JournalUrology
Volume130
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Aug 1

Fingerprint

Robotics
Patient Satisfaction
Research
Population
Video-Assisted Surgery
Communication
Costs and Cost Analysis
Postoperative Care
Laparoscopy
Laparotomy
Patient Care
Morbidity
Physicians
Pain
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Urology

Cite this

Oh, Cheol Kyu ; Kim, Kwang Hyun ; Jeong, Wooju ; Han, WoongKyu ; Rha, KoonHo ; Ahn, Bummo. / Research on Patient Satisfaction of Robotic Telerounding : A Pilot Study in a Korean Population. In: Urology. 2019 ; Vol. 130. pp. 205-208.
@article{0f28e0c0054946fd9f0d56e8efa1bc2e,
title = "Research on Patient Satisfaction of Robotic Telerounding: A Pilot Study in a Korean Population",
abstract = "Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and functionality of robotic telerounding among Korean patients using the RP-7 robot system and a questionnaire survey comparing the results of robotic telerounding and standard rounding in Korean patients. Methods: A total of 40 patients who underwent urologic minimally invasive video-assisted minilaparotomy surgery, laparoscopic and robotic surgery, and endoscopic surgery were recruited. The patients were divided into 2 groups – telerounding (20) and standard rounding (20) – and underwent robotic telerounding and standard rounding. We assessed the patients using a 24-item questionnaire to evaluate the efficacy and functionality of their hospital care. Results: The hospital factors such as self-rated health, assistance, and pain control scores showed no statistically significant differences between groups. Patient satisfaction showed a statistically significant difference in MD confidence, medical communication, explanation understanding, explanation satisfaction, mutual communication, and mutual response. In the telerounding group, participants were satisfied with the audio and video qualities and believed that the robotic telerounding provided better care, and 85{\%} of patients preferred telerounding in the absence of the attending physician. Conclusion: Robotic telerounding can provide efficient and cost-effective medical rounding by reducing inconvenience and labor cost with greater patient satisfaction with postoperative care. However, there is no statistically significant difference in the hospital factors and postoperative morbidity. In addition, the patients doubted that the robotic telerounding could replace standard rounding due to the Eastern culture.",
author = "Oh, {Cheol Kyu} and Kim, {Kwang Hyun} and Wooju Jeong and WoongKyu Han and KoonHo Rha and Bummo Ahn",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.030",
language = "English",
volume = "130",
pages = "205--208",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

Research on Patient Satisfaction of Robotic Telerounding : A Pilot Study in a Korean Population. / Oh, Cheol Kyu; Kim, Kwang Hyun; Jeong, Wooju; Han, WoongKyu; Rha, KoonHo; Ahn, Bummo.

In: Urology, Vol. 130, 01.08.2019, p. 205-208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research on Patient Satisfaction of Robotic Telerounding

T2 - A Pilot Study in a Korean Population

AU - Oh, Cheol Kyu

AU - Kim, Kwang Hyun

AU - Jeong, Wooju

AU - Han, WoongKyu

AU - Rha, KoonHo

AU - Ahn, Bummo

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and functionality of robotic telerounding among Korean patients using the RP-7 robot system and a questionnaire survey comparing the results of robotic telerounding and standard rounding in Korean patients. Methods: A total of 40 patients who underwent urologic minimally invasive video-assisted minilaparotomy surgery, laparoscopic and robotic surgery, and endoscopic surgery were recruited. The patients were divided into 2 groups – telerounding (20) and standard rounding (20) – and underwent robotic telerounding and standard rounding. We assessed the patients using a 24-item questionnaire to evaluate the efficacy and functionality of their hospital care. Results: The hospital factors such as self-rated health, assistance, and pain control scores showed no statistically significant differences between groups. Patient satisfaction showed a statistically significant difference in MD confidence, medical communication, explanation understanding, explanation satisfaction, mutual communication, and mutual response. In the telerounding group, participants were satisfied with the audio and video qualities and believed that the robotic telerounding provided better care, and 85% of patients preferred telerounding in the absence of the attending physician. Conclusion: Robotic telerounding can provide efficient and cost-effective medical rounding by reducing inconvenience and labor cost with greater patient satisfaction with postoperative care. However, there is no statistically significant difference in the hospital factors and postoperative morbidity. In addition, the patients doubted that the robotic telerounding could replace standard rounding due to the Eastern culture.

AB - Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and functionality of robotic telerounding among Korean patients using the RP-7 robot system and a questionnaire survey comparing the results of robotic telerounding and standard rounding in Korean patients. Methods: A total of 40 patients who underwent urologic minimally invasive video-assisted minilaparotomy surgery, laparoscopic and robotic surgery, and endoscopic surgery were recruited. The patients were divided into 2 groups – telerounding (20) and standard rounding (20) – and underwent robotic telerounding and standard rounding. We assessed the patients using a 24-item questionnaire to evaluate the efficacy and functionality of their hospital care. Results: The hospital factors such as self-rated health, assistance, and pain control scores showed no statistically significant differences between groups. Patient satisfaction showed a statistically significant difference in MD confidence, medical communication, explanation understanding, explanation satisfaction, mutual communication, and mutual response. In the telerounding group, participants were satisfied with the audio and video qualities and believed that the robotic telerounding provided better care, and 85% of patients preferred telerounding in the absence of the attending physician. Conclusion: Robotic telerounding can provide efficient and cost-effective medical rounding by reducing inconvenience and labor cost with greater patient satisfaction with postoperative care. However, there is no statistically significant difference in the hospital factors and postoperative morbidity. In addition, the patients doubted that the robotic telerounding could replace standard rounding due to the Eastern culture.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066126250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066126250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.030

DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.030

M3 - Article

C2 - 31059727

AN - SCOPUS:85066126250

VL - 130

SP - 205

EP - 208

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

ER -