Residual lower esophageal sphincter pressure as a prognostic factor in the pneumatic balloon treatment of achalasia

Jung Ho Park, Yongchan Lee, Hyuk Lee, HyoJin Park, Young Hoon Youn, Hyung Seok Park, Tae Hee Lee, Kyoung Sup Hong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Aims: Pneumatic balloon dilatation (PD) is a mainstay in achalasia treatment. The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors for successful treatment. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 76 patients with a diagnosis of achalasia who underwent PD from June 2010 to May 2013. Clinical symptoms were assessed using Eckardt score and manometry data were analyzed using resting and relaxation pressure (4sIRP) of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and the distal contractile integral (DCI), which was calculated for 10s from the start of deglutition between the upper margin of the LES and lower margin of upper esophageal contraction. Patients with achalasia were classified into three groups based on the Chicago classification. Results: Among 76 patients, 52 patients received PD, and the treatment was unsuccessful in 9 patients (6 in class I and 3 in class III). When comparing prognostic factors between successful and unsuccessful treatment groups, the mean value for 4sIRP in the unsuccessful treatment group was significantly lower than that in the successful treatment group (P<0.05). However, no difference was noticed in resting LES pressure, DCI, age, and sex. Furthermore, a lower mean value of 4sIRP was significantly related to unsuccessful treatment of achalasia (odds ratio, 1.092; 95% confidence interval, 1.001-1.191) even after adjustment for a series of confounding factors. Conclusions: Lower 4sIRP may be a prognostic indicator for poor treatment outcome after PD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-63
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Lower Esophageal Sphincter
Esophageal Achalasia
Pressure
Dilatation
Therapeutics
Manometry
Deglutition
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Park, Jung Ho ; Lee, Yongchan ; Lee, Hyuk ; Park, HyoJin ; Youn, Young Hoon ; Park, Hyung Seok ; Lee, Tae Hee ; Hong, Kyoung Sup. / Residual lower esophageal sphincter pressure as a prognostic factor in the pneumatic balloon treatment of achalasia. In: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia). 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 59-63.
@article{cf19b0a0bf2d4af1a4b462ca861cf6b8,
title = "Residual lower esophageal sphincter pressure as a prognostic factor in the pneumatic balloon treatment of achalasia",
abstract = "Background and Aims: Pneumatic balloon dilatation (PD) is a mainstay in achalasia treatment. The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors for successful treatment. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 76 patients with a diagnosis of achalasia who underwent PD from June 2010 to May 2013. Clinical symptoms were assessed using Eckardt score and manometry data were analyzed using resting and relaxation pressure (4sIRP) of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and the distal contractile integral (DCI), which was calculated for 10s from the start of deglutition between the upper margin of the LES and lower margin of upper esophageal contraction. Patients with achalasia were classified into three groups based on the Chicago classification. Results: Among 76 patients, 52 patients received PD, and the treatment was unsuccessful in 9 patients (6 in class I and 3 in class III). When comparing prognostic factors between successful and unsuccessful treatment groups, the mean value for 4sIRP in the unsuccessful treatment group was significantly lower than that in the successful treatment group (P<0.05). However, no difference was noticed in resting LES pressure, DCI, age, and sex. Furthermore, a lower mean value of 4sIRP was significantly related to unsuccessful treatment of achalasia (odds ratio, 1.092; 95{\%} confidence interval, 1.001-1.191) even after adjustment for a series of confounding factors. Conclusions: Lower 4sIRP may be a prognostic indicator for poor treatment outcome after PD.",
author = "Park, {Jung Ho} and Yongchan Lee and Hyuk Lee and HyoJin Park and Youn, {Young Hoon} and Park, {Hyung Seok} and Lee, {Tae Hee} and Hong, {Kyoung Sup}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jgh.12642",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "59--63",
journal = "Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)",
issn = "0815-9319",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Residual lower esophageal sphincter pressure as a prognostic factor in the pneumatic balloon treatment of achalasia. / Park, Jung Ho; Lee, Yongchan; Lee, Hyuk; Park, HyoJin; Youn, Young Hoon; Park, Hyung Seok; Lee, Tae Hee; Hong, Kyoung Sup.

In: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia), Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 59-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Residual lower esophageal sphincter pressure as a prognostic factor in the pneumatic balloon treatment of achalasia

AU - Park, Jung Ho

AU - Lee, Yongchan

AU - Lee, Hyuk

AU - Park, HyoJin

AU - Youn, Young Hoon

AU - Park, Hyung Seok

AU - Lee, Tae Hee

AU - Hong, Kyoung Sup

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background and Aims: Pneumatic balloon dilatation (PD) is a mainstay in achalasia treatment. The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors for successful treatment. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 76 patients with a diagnosis of achalasia who underwent PD from June 2010 to May 2013. Clinical symptoms were assessed using Eckardt score and manometry data were analyzed using resting and relaxation pressure (4sIRP) of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and the distal contractile integral (DCI), which was calculated for 10s from the start of deglutition between the upper margin of the LES and lower margin of upper esophageal contraction. Patients with achalasia were classified into three groups based on the Chicago classification. Results: Among 76 patients, 52 patients received PD, and the treatment was unsuccessful in 9 patients (6 in class I and 3 in class III). When comparing prognostic factors between successful and unsuccessful treatment groups, the mean value for 4sIRP in the unsuccessful treatment group was significantly lower than that in the successful treatment group (P<0.05). However, no difference was noticed in resting LES pressure, DCI, age, and sex. Furthermore, a lower mean value of 4sIRP was significantly related to unsuccessful treatment of achalasia (odds ratio, 1.092; 95% confidence interval, 1.001-1.191) even after adjustment for a series of confounding factors. Conclusions: Lower 4sIRP may be a prognostic indicator for poor treatment outcome after PD.

AB - Background and Aims: Pneumatic balloon dilatation (PD) is a mainstay in achalasia treatment. The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors for successful treatment. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 76 patients with a diagnosis of achalasia who underwent PD from June 2010 to May 2013. Clinical symptoms were assessed using Eckardt score and manometry data were analyzed using resting and relaxation pressure (4sIRP) of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and the distal contractile integral (DCI), which was calculated for 10s from the start of deglutition between the upper margin of the LES and lower margin of upper esophageal contraction. Patients with achalasia were classified into three groups based on the Chicago classification. Results: Among 76 patients, 52 patients received PD, and the treatment was unsuccessful in 9 patients (6 in class I and 3 in class III). When comparing prognostic factors between successful and unsuccessful treatment groups, the mean value for 4sIRP in the unsuccessful treatment group was significantly lower than that in the successful treatment group (P<0.05). However, no difference was noticed in resting LES pressure, DCI, age, and sex. Furthermore, a lower mean value of 4sIRP was significantly related to unsuccessful treatment of achalasia (odds ratio, 1.092; 95% confidence interval, 1.001-1.191) even after adjustment for a series of confounding factors. Conclusions: Lower 4sIRP may be a prognostic indicator for poor treatment outcome after PD.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919659106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919659106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jgh.12642

DO - 10.1111/jgh.12642

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 59

EP - 63

JO - Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)

JF - Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)

SN - 0815-9319

IS - 1

ER -