Revision and Salvage Management: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle

the International Consensus Group on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article was to report on the consensus statements on “Revision and Salvage Management” developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed on in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus, 51% to 74%; strong consensus, 75% to 99%; unanimous, 100%. Results: A total of 8 statements on revision and salvage management reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. One achieved unanimous support and 7 reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). All statements reached at least 85% agreement. Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with revision and salvage management in the cartilage repair of the ankle.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54S-60S
JournalFoot and Ankle International
Volume39
Issue number1_suppl
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jul 1

Fingerprint

Ankle
Cartilage
Practice Guidelines

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

the International Consensus Group on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. / Revision and Salvage Management : Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. In: Foot and Ankle International. 2018 ; Vol. 39, No. 1_suppl. pp. 54S-60S.
@article{443e9108dad94b7f9028ec33d8486831,
title = "Revision and Salvage Management: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle",
abstract = "Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article was to report on the consensus statements on “Revision and Salvage Management” developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed on in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus, 51{\%} to 74{\%}; strong consensus, 75{\%} to 99{\%}; unanimous, 100{\%}. Results: A total of 8 statements on revision and salvage management reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. One achieved unanimous support and 7 reached strong consensus (greater than 75{\%} agreement). All statements reached at least 85{\%} agreement. Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with revision and salvage management in the cartilage repair of the ankle.",
author = "{the International Consensus Group on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle} and Mittwede, {Peter N.} and Murawski, {Christopher D.} and Jakob Ackermann and Simon G{\"o}rtz and Beat Hintermann and Kim, {Hak Jun} and Thordarson, {David B.} and Francesca Vannini and Younger, {Alastair S.E.} and Adams, {Samuel B.} and Andrews, {Carol L.} and Chayanin Angthong and Batista, {Jorge P.} and Baur, {Onno L.} and Steve Bayer and Christoph Becher and Berlet, {Gregory C.} and Boakye, {Lorraine A.T.} and Brown, {Alexandra J.} and Roberto Buda and Calder, {James D.F.} and Canata, {Gian Luigi} and Carreira, {Dominic S.} and Clanton, {Thomas O.} and Jari Dahmen and Pieter D’Hooghe and DiGiovanni, {Christopher W.} and Dombrowski, {Malcolm E.} and Drakos, {Mark C.} and Ferkel, {Richard D.} and Ferrao, {Paulo N.F.} and Fortier, {Lisa A.} and Mark Glazebrook and Eric Giza and Mohamed Gomaa and Haleem, {Amgad M.} and Kamran Hamid and Laszlo Hangody and Hannon, {Charles P.} and Daniel Haverkamp and Jay Hertel and Hogan, {Ma Calus V.} and Hunt, {Kenneth J.} and Hurley, {Eoghan T.} and J{\'o}n Karlsson and Kearns, {Stephen R.} and Kennedy, {John G.} and Kerkhoffs, {Gino M.M.J.} and Kong, {Siu Wah} and jinwoo lee",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1071100718781863",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "54S--60S",
journal = "Foot and Ankle International",
issn = "1071-1007",
publisher = "AOFAS - American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society",
number = "1_suppl",

}

Revision and Salvage Management : Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. / the International Consensus Group on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle.

In: Foot and Ankle International, Vol. 39, No. 1_suppl, 01.07.2018, p. 54S-60S.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revision and Salvage Management

T2 - Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle

AU - the International Consensus Group on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle

AU - Mittwede, Peter N.

AU - Murawski, Christopher D.

AU - Ackermann, Jakob

AU - Görtz, Simon

AU - Hintermann, Beat

AU - Kim, Hak Jun

AU - Thordarson, David B.

AU - Vannini, Francesca

AU - Younger, Alastair S.E.

AU - Adams, Samuel B.

AU - Andrews, Carol L.

AU - Angthong, Chayanin

AU - Batista, Jorge P.

AU - Baur, Onno L.

AU - Bayer, Steve

AU - Becher, Christoph

AU - Berlet, Gregory C.

AU - Boakye, Lorraine A.T.

AU - Brown, Alexandra J.

AU - Buda, Roberto

AU - Calder, James D.F.

AU - Canata, Gian Luigi

AU - Carreira, Dominic S.

AU - Clanton, Thomas O.

AU - Dahmen, Jari

AU - D’Hooghe, Pieter

AU - DiGiovanni, Christopher W.

AU - Dombrowski, Malcolm E.

AU - Drakos, Mark C.

AU - Ferkel, Richard D.

AU - Ferrao, Paulo N.F.

AU - Fortier, Lisa A.

AU - Glazebrook, Mark

AU - Giza, Eric

AU - Gomaa, Mohamed

AU - Haleem, Amgad M.

AU - Hamid, Kamran

AU - Hangody, Laszlo

AU - Hannon, Charles P.

AU - Haverkamp, Daniel

AU - Hertel, Jay

AU - Hogan, Ma Calus V.

AU - Hunt, Kenneth J.

AU - Hurley, Eoghan T.

AU - Karlsson, Jón

AU - Kearns, Stephen R.

AU - Kennedy, John G.

AU - Kerkhoffs, Gino M.M.J.

AU - Kong, Siu Wah

AU - lee, jinwoo

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article was to report on the consensus statements on “Revision and Salvage Management” developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed on in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus, 51% to 74%; strong consensus, 75% to 99%; unanimous, 100%. Results: A total of 8 statements on revision and salvage management reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. One achieved unanimous support and 7 reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). All statements reached at least 85% agreement. Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with revision and salvage management in the cartilage repair of the ankle.

AB - Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article was to report on the consensus statements on “Revision and Salvage Management” developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed on in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus, 51% to 74%; strong consensus, 75% to 99%; unanimous, 100%. Results: A total of 8 statements on revision and salvage management reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. One achieved unanimous support and 7 reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). All statements reached at least 85% agreement. Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with revision and salvage management in the cartilage repair of the ankle.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049887204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049887204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1071100718781863

DO - 10.1177/1071100718781863

M3 - Article

C2 - 30215315

AN - SCOPUS:85049887204

VL - 39

SP - 54S-60S

JO - Foot and Ankle International

JF - Foot and Ankle International

SN - 1071-1007

IS - 1_suppl

ER -