Rising China, pivotal middle power South Korea, and alliance transition theory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The alliance transition theory is developed by incorporating the pivotal middle power’s role into Organski’s power transition theoretical framework. The theory posits that the situation of parity of alliance power between the dominant power’s alliance camp and the rising dissatisfied challenger’s camp is likely to lead to major war; and, further, that the pivotal middle power is able not only to help reinforce the dominant state’s power preponderance over its potential challenger but also to play a mediating role of persuading the rising potential challenger to be more satisfied with the status quo. Applying the alliance transition arguments to the East Asian region, the theory suggests that a pivotal middle power such as South Korea can be a crucial addition to the United States’ capabilities to maintain its preponderance of power over the potential challenger, the People’s Republic of China. Together with other like-minded middle powers, the Republic of Korea, as a key regional ally of the United States, can also play the constructive role of persuading China to be a responsible member of the status quo system, by engaging substantially with China.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251-265
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Area Studies Review
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Sep 1

Fingerprint

South Korea
China
allies
Korea
republic

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{30df70af6e4b4364b2c86f54197ad0f4,
title = "Rising China, pivotal middle power South Korea, and alliance transition theory",
abstract = "The alliance transition theory is developed by incorporating the pivotal middle power’s role into Organski’s power transition theoretical framework. The theory posits that the situation of parity of alliance power between the dominant power’s alliance camp and the rising dissatisfied challenger’s camp is likely to lead to major war; and, further, that the pivotal middle power is able not only to help reinforce the dominant state’s power preponderance over its potential challenger but also to play a mediating role of persuading the rising potential challenger to be more satisfied with the status quo. Applying the alliance transition arguments to the East Asian region, the theory suggests that a pivotal middle power such as South Korea can be a crucial addition to the United States’ capabilities to maintain its preponderance of power over the potential challenger, the People’s Republic of China. Together with other like-minded middle powers, the Republic of Korea, as a key regional ally of the United States, can also play the constructive role of persuading China to be a responsible member of the status quo system, by engaging substantially with China.",
author = "Kim, {Woo Sang}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2233865915595531",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "251--265",
journal = "International Area Studies Review",
issn = "2233-8659",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Rising China, pivotal middle power South Korea, and alliance transition theory. / Kim, Woo Sang.

In: International Area Studies Review, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.09.2015, p. 251-265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rising China, pivotal middle power South Korea, and alliance transition theory

AU - Kim, Woo Sang

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - The alliance transition theory is developed by incorporating the pivotal middle power’s role into Organski’s power transition theoretical framework. The theory posits that the situation of parity of alliance power between the dominant power’s alliance camp and the rising dissatisfied challenger’s camp is likely to lead to major war; and, further, that the pivotal middle power is able not only to help reinforce the dominant state’s power preponderance over its potential challenger but also to play a mediating role of persuading the rising potential challenger to be more satisfied with the status quo. Applying the alliance transition arguments to the East Asian region, the theory suggests that a pivotal middle power such as South Korea can be a crucial addition to the United States’ capabilities to maintain its preponderance of power over the potential challenger, the People’s Republic of China. Together with other like-minded middle powers, the Republic of Korea, as a key regional ally of the United States, can also play the constructive role of persuading China to be a responsible member of the status quo system, by engaging substantially with China.

AB - The alliance transition theory is developed by incorporating the pivotal middle power’s role into Organski’s power transition theoretical framework. The theory posits that the situation of parity of alliance power between the dominant power’s alliance camp and the rising dissatisfied challenger’s camp is likely to lead to major war; and, further, that the pivotal middle power is able not only to help reinforce the dominant state’s power preponderance over its potential challenger but also to play a mediating role of persuading the rising potential challenger to be more satisfied with the status quo. Applying the alliance transition arguments to the East Asian region, the theory suggests that a pivotal middle power such as South Korea can be a crucial addition to the United States’ capabilities to maintain its preponderance of power over the potential challenger, the People’s Republic of China. Together with other like-minded middle powers, the Republic of Korea, as a key regional ally of the United States, can also play the constructive role of persuading China to be a responsible member of the status quo system, by engaging substantially with China.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940391980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940391980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2233865915595531

DO - 10.1177/2233865915595531

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 251

EP - 265

JO - International Area Studies Review

JF - International Area Studies Review

SN - 2233-8659

IS - 3

ER -