Risks, Outcomes, and Evidence-Based Interventions for Girls in the US Juvenile Justice System

Leslie D. Leve, Patricia Chamberlain, Hyoun Kyoung Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The proportion of the juvenile justice population that comprises females is increasing, yet few evidence-based models have been evaluated and implemented with girls in the juvenile justice system. Although much is known about the risk and protective factors for girls who participate in serious delinquency, significant gaps in the research base hamper the development and implementation of theoretically based intervention approaches. In this review, we first summarize the extant empirical work about the predictors and sequelae of juvenile justice involvement for girls. Identified risk and protective factors that correspond to girls’ involvement in the juvenile justice system have been shown to largely parallel those of boys, although exposure rates and magnitudes of association sometimes differ by sex. Second, we summarize findings from empirically validated, evidence-based interventions for juvenile justice-involved youths that have been tested with girls. The interventions include Functional Family Therapy, Multisystemic Therapy, Multidimensional Family Therapy, and Treatment Foster Care Oregon (formerly known as Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care). We conclude that existing evidence-based practices appear to be effective for girls. However, few studies have been sufficiently designed to permit conclusions about whether sex-specific interventions would yield any better outcomes for girls than would interventions that already exist for both sexes and that have a strong base of evidence to support them. Third, we propose recommendations for feasible, cost-efficient next steps to advance the research and intervention agendas for this under-researched and underserved population of highly vulnerable youths.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)252-279
Number of pages28
JournalClinical Child and Family Psychology Review
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Sep 14

Fingerprint

Social Justice
justice
evidence
Family Therapy
family therapy
Evidence-Based Practice
Vulnerable Populations
delinquency
Research
Therapeutics
Costs and Cost Analysis
costs
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{68381e9c65dc44269204d5f4d16853a4,
title = "Risks, Outcomes, and Evidence-Based Interventions for Girls in the US Juvenile Justice System",
abstract = "The proportion of the juvenile justice population that comprises females is increasing, yet few evidence-based models have been evaluated and implemented with girls in the juvenile justice system. Although much is known about the risk and protective factors for girls who participate in serious delinquency, significant gaps in the research base hamper the development and implementation of theoretically based intervention approaches. In this review, we first summarize the extant empirical work about the predictors and sequelae of juvenile justice involvement for girls. Identified risk and protective factors that correspond to girls’ involvement in the juvenile justice system have been shown to largely parallel those of boys, although exposure rates and magnitudes of association sometimes differ by sex. Second, we summarize findings from empirically validated, evidence-based interventions for juvenile justice-involved youths that have been tested with girls. The interventions include Functional Family Therapy, Multisystemic Therapy, Multidimensional Family Therapy, and Treatment Foster Care Oregon (formerly known as Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care). We conclude that existing evidence-based practices appear to be effective for girls. However, few studies have been sufficiently designed to permit conclusions about whether sex-specific interventions would yield any better outcomes for girls than would interventions that already exist for both sexes and that have a strong base of evidence to support them. Third, we propose recommendations for feasible, cost-efficient next steps to advance the research and intervention agendas for this under-researched and underserved population of highly vulnerable youths.",
author = "Leve, {Leslie D.} and Patricia Chamberlain and Kim, {Hyoun Kyoung}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1007/s10567-015-0186-6",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "252--279",
journal = "Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review",
issn = "1096-4037",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",
number = "3",

}

Risks, Outcomes, and Evidence-Based Interventions for Girls in the US Juvenile Justice System. / Leve, Leslie D.; Chamberlain, Patricia; Kim, Hyoun Kyoung.

In: Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, Vol. 18, No. 3, 14.09.2015, p. 252-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risks, Outcomes, and Evidence-Based Interventions for Girls in the US Juvenile Justice System

AU - Leve, Leslie D.

AU - Chamberlain, Patricia

AU - Kim, Hyoun Kyoung

PY - 2015/9/14

Y1 - 2015/9/14

N2 - The proportion of the juvenile justice population that comprises females is increasing, yet few evidence-based models have been evaluated and implemented with girls in the juvenile justice system. Although much is known about the risk and protective factors for girls who participate in serious delinquency, significant gaps in the research base hamper the development and implementation of theoretically based intervention approaches. In this review, we first summarize the extant empirical work about the predictors and sequelae of juvenile justice involvement for girls. Identified risk and protective factors that correspond to girls’ involvement in the juvenile justice system have been shown to largely parallel those of boys, although exposure rates and magnitudes of association sometimes differ by sex. Second, we summarize findings from empirically validated, evidence-based interventions for juvenile justice-involved youths that have been tested with girls. The interventions include Functional Family Therapy, Multisystemic Therapy, Multidimensional Family Therapy, and Treatment Foster Care Oregon (formerly known as Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care). We conclude that existing evidence-based practices appear to be effective for girls. However, few studies have been sufficiently designed to permit conclusions about whether sex-specific interventions would yield any better outcomes for girls than would interventions that already exist for both sexes and that have a strong base of evidence to support them. Third, we propose recommendations for feasible, cost-efficient next steps to advance the research and intervention agendas for this under-researched and underserved population of highly vulnerable youths.

AB - The proportion of the juvenile justice population that comprises females is increasing, yet few evidence-based models have been evaluated and implemented with girls in the juvenile justice system. Although much is known about the risk and protective factors for girls who participate in serious delinquency, significant gaps in the research base hamper the development and implementation of theoretically based intervention approaches. In this review, we first summarize the extant empirical work about the predictors and sequelae of juvenile justice involvement for girls. Identified risk and protective factors that correspond to girls’ involvement in the juvenile justice system have been shown to largely parallel those of boys, although exposure rates and magnitudes of association sometimes differ by sex. Second, we summarize findings from empirically validated, evidence-based interventions for juvenile justice-involved youths that have been tested with girls. The interventions include Functional Family Therapy, Multisystemic Therapy, Multidimensional Family Therapy, and Treatment Foster Care Oregon (formerly known as Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care). We conclude that existing evidence-based practices appear to be effective for girls. However, few studies have been sufficiently designed to permit conclusions about whether sex-specific interventions would yield any better outcomes for girls than would interventions that already exist for both sexes and that have a strong base of evidence to support them. Third, we propose recommendations for feasible, cost-efficient next steps to advance the research and intervention agendas for this under-researched and underserved population of highly vulnerable youths.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939271950&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939271950&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10567-015-0186-6

DO - 10.1007/s10567-015-0186-6

M3 - Review article

C2 - 26119215

AN - SCOPUS:84939271950

VL - 18

SP - 252

EP - 279

JO - Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

JF - Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

SN - 1096-4037

IS - 3

ER -