TY - JOUR
T1 - Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Endophytic Tumors
AU - Kim, Dae Keun
AU - Komninos, Christos
AU - Kim, Lawrence
AU - Rha, Koon Ho
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2015/11/23
Y1 - 2015/11/23
N2 - Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has gained increasing popularity in the management of renal masses due to its technical feasibility and shorter learning curve with superior perioperative outcomes compared to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Given the cumulation of surgical experience on RAPN, the indication for RAPN has been extended to more challenging, complex cases, such as hilar or endophytic tumors. Renal masses that are completely endophytic can be very challenging to surgeons. These cases are associated with poor recognition of mass extension, higher risk of inadvertent vascular, or pelvicalyceal system injury. As a result, this can lead to potential positive surgical margin, difficulty in performing renorrhaphy as well as higher perioperative complication rates. There is few evidence of oncologic and functional outcomes of RAPN on treating endophytic masses. Therefore, the objective of this review is to critically analyze the current evidence and to provide a summary on the outcomes of RAPN for endophytic renal masses.
AB - Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has gained increasing popularity in the management of renal masses due to its technical feasibility and shorter learning curve with superior perioperative outcomes compared to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Given the cumulation of surgical experience on RAPN, the indication for RAPN has been extended to more challenging, complex cases, such as hilar or endophytic tumors. Renal masses that are completely endophytic can be very challenging to surgeons. These cases are associated with poor recognition of mass extension, higher risk of inadvertent vascular, or pelvicalyceal system injury. As a result, this can lead to potential positive surgical margin, difficulty in performing renorrhaphy as well as higher perioperative complication rates. There is few evidence of oncologic and functional outcomes of RAPN on treating endophytic masses. Therefore, the objective of this review is to critically analyze the current evidence and to provide a summary on the outcomes of RAPN for endophytic renal masses.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942119960&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942119960&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11934-015-0552-4
DO - 10.1007/s11934-015-0552-4
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26373545
AN - SCOPUS:84942119960
SN - 1527-2737
VL - 16
JO - Current Urology Reports
JF - Current Urology Reports
IS - 11
M1 - 76
ER -