Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Endophytic Tumors

Dae Keun Kim, Christos Komninos, Lawrence Kim, KoonHo Rha

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has gained increasing popularity in the management of renal masses due to its technical feasibility and shorter learning curve with superior perioperative outcomes compared to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Given the cumulation of surgical experience on RAPN, the indication for RAPN has been extended to more challenging, complex cases, such as hilar or endophytic tumors. Renal masses that are completely endophytic can be very challenging to surgeons. These cases are associated with poor recognition of mass extension, higher risk of inadvertent vascular, or pelvicalyceal system injury. As a result, this can lead to potential positive surgical margin, difficulty in performing renorrhaphy as well as higher perioperative complication rates. There is few evidence of oncologic and functional outcomes of RAPN on treating endophytic masses. Therefore, the objective of this review is to critically analyze the current evidence and to provide a summary on the outcomes of RAPN for endophytic renal masses.

Original languageEnglish
Article number76
JournalCurrent Urology Reports
Volume16
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Nov 23

Fingerprint

Nephrectomy
Neoplasms
Kidney
Learning Curve
Blood Vessels
Wounds and Injuries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Urology

Cite this

Kim, Dae Keun ; Komninos, Christos ; Kim, Lawrence ; Rha, KoonHo. / Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Endophytic Tumors. In: Current Urology Reports. 2015 ; Vol. 16, No. 11.
@article{63a076fbd1c04cf29ce2d1d7cd48690c,
title = "Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Endophytic Tumors",
abstract = "Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has gained increasing popularity in the management of renal masses due to its technical feasibility and shorter learning curve with superior perioperative outcomes compared to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Given the cumulation of surgical experience on RAPN, the indication for RAPN has been extended to more challenging, complex cases, such as hilar or endophytic tumors. Renal masses that are completely endophytic can be very challenging to surgeons. These cases are associated with poor recognition of mass extension, higher risk of inadvertent vascular, or pelvicalyceal system injury. As a result, this can lead to potential positive surgical margin, difficulty in performing renorrhaphy as well as higher perioperative complication rates. There is few evidence of oncologic and functional outcomes of RAPN on treating endophytic masses. Therefore, the objective of this review is to critically analyze the current evidence and to provide a summary on the outcomes of RAPN for endophytic renal masses.",
author = "Kim, {Dae Keun} and Christos Komninos and Lawrence Kim and KoonHo Rha",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1007/s11934-015-0552-4",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "Current Urology Reports",
issn = "1527-2737",
publisher = "Current Science, Inc.",
number = "11",

}

Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Endophytic Tumors. / Kim, Dae Keun; Komninos, Christos; Kim, Lawrence; Rha, KoonHo.

In: Current Urology Reports, Vol. 16, No. 11, 76, 23.11.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Endophytic Tumors

AU - Kim, Dae Keun

AU - Komninos, Christos

AU - Kim, Lawrence

AU - Rha, KoonHo

PY - 2015/11/23

Y1 - 2015/11/23

N2 - Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has gained increasing popularity in the management of renal masses due to its technical feasibility and shorter learning curve with superior perioperative outcomes compared to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Given the cumulation of surgical experience on RAPN, the indication for RAPN has been extended to more challenging, complex cases, such as hilar or endophytic tumors. Renal masses that are completely endophytic can be very challenging to surgeons. These cases are associated with poor recognition of mass extension, higher risk of inadvertent vascular, or pelvicalyceal system injury. As a result, this can lead to potential positive surgical margin, difficulty in performing renorrhaphy as well as higher perioperative complication rates. There is few evidence of oncologic and functional outcomes of RAPN on treating endophytic masses. Therefore, the objective of this review is to critically analyze the current evidence and to provide a summary on the outcomes of RAPN for endophytic renal masses.

AB - Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has gained increasing popularity in the management of renal masses due to its technical feasibility and shorter learning curve with superior perioperative outcomes compared to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Given the cumulation of surgical experience on RAPN, the indication for RAPN has been extended to more challenging, complex cases, such as hilar or endophytic tumors. Renal masses that are completely endophytic can be very challenging to surgeons. These cases are associated with poor recognition of mass extension, higher risk of inadvertent vascular, or pelvicalyceal system injury. As a result, this can lead to potential positive surgical margin, difficulty in performing renorrhaphy as well as higher perioperative complication rates. There is few evidence of oncologic and functional outcomes of RAPN on treating endophytic masses. Therefore, the objective of this review is to critically analyze the current evidence and to provide a summary on the outcomes of RAPN for endophytic renal masses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942119960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942119960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11934-015-0552-4

DO - 10.1007/s11934-015-0552-4

M3 - Review article

C2 - 26373545

AN - SCOPUS:84942119960

VL - 16

JO - Current Urology Reports

JF - Current Urology Reports

SN - 1527-2737

IS - 11

M1 - 76

ER -