Robotic surgery for gastric cancer

Taeil Son, Woo Jin Hyung

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for gastric cancer has been gaining popularity. Although many surgeons have reported the feasibility of MIS for gastric cancer, difficulties in standard lymph node dissection and anastomoses during laparoscopic procedures have hindered the widespread use of this technique. To overcome these difficulties, a robotic system has been adopted and its feasibility and safety have been shown. However, robotic surgery for gastric cancer has shown few definite advantages over conventional laparoscopy so far. In addition, longer operation time and much higher cost for this procedure are consistently noted. Recently, some retrospective comparative studies have reported benefits of robotic surgery over laparoscopic gastrectomy such as more complete D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer, less blood loss, and shorter learning curves. For the wider spread of robotic surgery for gastric cancer, well designed studies are required to verify patients' secondary advantages, the cost benefit trade-off, and oncologic outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)613-619
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the Korean Medical Association
Volume55
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jul 1

Fingerprint

Robotics
Stomach Neoplasms
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Lymph Node Excision
Laparoscopy
Learning Curve
Gastrectomy
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Safety
Costs and Cost Analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{7ad7d59f45c84c4092effdf706971fef,
title = "Robotic surgery for gastric cancer",
abstract = "Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for gastric cancer has been gaining popularity. Although many surgeons have reported the feasibility of MIS for gastric cancer, difficulties in standard lymph node dissection and anastomoses during laparoscopic procedures have hindered the widespread use of this technique. To overcome these difficulties, a robotic system has been adopted and its feasibility and safety have been shown. However, robotic surgery for gastric cancer has shown few definite advantages over conventional laparoscopy so far. In addition, longer operation time and much higher cost for this procedure are consistently noted. Recently, some retrospective comparative studies have reported benefits of robotic surgery over laparoscopic gastrectomy such as more complete D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer, less blood loss, and shorter learning curves. For the wider spread of robotic surgery for gastric cancer, well designed studies are required to verify patients' secondary advantages, the cost benefit trade-off, and oncologic outcomes.",
author = "Taeil Son and Hyung, {Woo Jin}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5124/jkma.2012.55.7.613",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "613--619",
journal = "Journal of the Korean Medical Association",
issn = "1975-8456",
publisher = "Korean Medical Association",
number = "7",

}

Robotic surgery for gastric cancer. / Son, Taeil; Hyung, Woo Jin.

In: Journal of the Korean Medical Association, Vol. 55, No. 7, 01.07.2012, p. 613-619.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robotic surgery for gastric cancer

AU - Son, Taeil

AU - Hyung, Woo Jin

PY - 2012/7/1

Y1 - 2012/7/1

N2 - Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for gastric cancer has been gaining popularity. Although many surgeons have reported the feasibility of MIS for gastric cancer, difficulties in standard lymph node dissection and anastomoses during laparoscopic procedures have hindered the widespread use of this technique. To overcome these difficulties, a robotic system has been adopted and its feasibility and safety have been shown. However, robotic surgery for gastric cancer has shown few definite advantages over conventional laparoscopy so far. In addition, longer operation time and much higher cost for this procedure are consistently noted. Recently, some retrospective comparative studies have reported benefits of robotic surgery over laparoscopic gastrectomy such as more complete D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer, less blood loss, and shorter learning curves. For the wider spread of robotic surgery for gastric cancer, well designed studies are required to verify patients' secondary advantages, the cost benefit trade-off, and oncologic outcomes.

AB - Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for gastric cancer has been gaining popularity. Although many surgeons have reported the feasibility of MIS for gastric cancer, difficulties in standard lymph node dissection and anastomoses during laparoscopic procedures have hindered the widespread use of this technique. To overcome these difficulties, a robotic system has been adopted and its feasibility and safety have been shown. However, robotic surgery for gastric cancer has shown few definite advantages over conventional laparoscopy so far. In addition, longer operation time and much higher cost for this procedure are consistently noted. Recently, some retrospective comparative studies have reported benefits of robotic surgery over laparoscopic gastrectomy such as more complete D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer, less blood loss, and shorter learning curves. For the wider spread of robotic surgery for gastric cancer, well designed studies are required to verify patients' secondary advantages, the cost benefit trade-off, and oncologic outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864032264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864032264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5124/jkma.2012.55.7.613

DO - 10.5124/jkma.2012.55.7.613

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84864032264

VL - 55

SP - 613

EP - 619

JO - Journal of the Korean Medical Association

JF - Journal of the Korean Medical Association

SN - 1975-8456

IS - 7

ER -