Robotic surgery for gastric tumor: Current status and new approaches

Seung Hyun Lim, Hae Min Lee, Taeil Son, WooJin Hyung, Hyoung Il Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Surgical techniques have evolved tremendously over this past century. To maximize the efficacy and minimize the invasiveness of laparoscopic surgery, researchers have sought to implement wider application of robotics. Nevertheless, both optimism without sound evidence and fear of new technology obscure the appropriate uses of robotic surgery. In the present review, we attempted to provide a balanced perspective on the current state of robotic gastrectomy, outlining evidence and opportunities for the use thereof. Although evidence is limited, the use of robotics is feasible for gastric cancer surgery, and less than 10 cases of robotic surgery are needed to become proficient therein. Compared to the clinical impact of laparoscopy on gastric cancer surgery, the additional benefits of robotic surgery to patients seem to be limited. Despite additional costs and longer surgeries, robotic surgery reportedly does not offer surgical outcomes superior to those for laparoscopic surgery, according to a recent multicenter study. Meanwhile, however, our in-depth review of retrospective and prospective reports revealed that robots could expand the indications of minimally invasive gastrectomy for patients requiring total gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection. Moreover, we found that robotic gastrectomy is associated with a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes, less bleeding, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stay, compared to laparoscopic gastrectomy. Accordingly, new surgical approaches using advanced technologies, such as near infrared detectors, the Tilepro® multi-input display, dual consoles, and the Single-Site® system, are under investigation. In conclusion, measuring the additional benefits of robotic over laparoscopic surgery would be difficult and clinically insignificant. Thus, developing new surgical procedures that extend the benefits of conventional laparoscopic surgery to patients in whom minimally invasive surgery would not be possible is necessary to justify the greater use of robotic surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Article number28
JournalTranslational Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume2016
Issue numberAPR
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Robotics
Stomach
Gastrectomy
Laparoscopy
Neoplasms
Stomach Neoplasms
Technology
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Lymph Node Excision
Multicenter Studies
Fear
Length of Stay
Lymph Nodes
Research Personnel
Hemorrhage
Costs and Cost Analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Lim, Seung Hyun ; Lee, Hae Min ; Son, Taeil ; Hyung, WooJin ; Kim, Hyoung Il. / Robotic surgery for gastric tumor : Current status and new approaches. In: Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2016 ; Vol. 2016, No. APR.
@article{3709900e5e5b4a0e8b4a5be4537f4ff0,
title = "Robotic surgery for gastric tumor: Current status and new approaches",
abstract = "Surgical techniques have evolved tremendously over this past century. To maximize the efficacy and minimize the invasiveness of laparoscopic surgery, researchers have sought to implement wider application of robotics. Nevertheless, both optimism without sound evidence and fear of new technology obscure the appropriate uses of robotic surgery. In the present review, we attempted to provide a balanced perspective on the current state of robotic gastrectomy, outlining evidence and opportunities for the use thereof. Although evidence is limited, the use of robotics is feasible for gastric cancer surgery, and less than 10 cases of robotic surgery are needed to become proficient therein. Compared to the clinical impact of laparoscopy on gastric cancer surgery, the additional benefits of robotic surgery to patients seem to be limited. Despite additional costs and longer surgeries, robotic surgery reportedly does not offer surgical outcomes superior to those for laparoscopic surgery, according to a recent multicenter study. Meanwhile, however, our in-depth review of retrospective and prospective reports revealed that robots could expand the indications of minimally invasive gastrectomy for patients requiring total gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection. Moreover, we found that robotic gastrectomy is associated with a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes, less bleeding, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stay, compared to laparoscopic gastrectomy. Accordingly, new surgical approaches using advanced technologies, such as near infrared detectors, the Tilepro{\circledR} multi-input display, dual consoles, and the Single-Site{\circledR} system, are under investigation. In conclusion, measuring the additional benefits of robotic over laparoscopic surgery would be difficult and clinically insignificant. Thus, developing new surgical procedures that extend the benefits of conventional laparoscopic surgery to patients in whom minimally invasive surgery would not be possible is necessary to justify the greater use of robotic surgery.",
author = "Lim, {Seung Hyun} and Lee, {Hae Min} and Taeil Son and WooJin Hyung and Kim, {Hyoung Il}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.21037/tgh.2016.03.21",
language = "English",
volume = "2016",
journal = "Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology",
issn = "2224-476X",
publisher = "AME Publishing Company",
number = "APR",

}

Robotic surgery for gastric tumor : Current status and new approaches. / Lim, Seung Hyun; Lee, Hae Min; Son, Taeil; Hyung, WooJin; Kim, Hyoung Il.

In: Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vol. 2016, No. APR, 28, 01.01.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robotic surgery for gastric tumor

T2 - Current status and new approaches

AU - Lim, Seung Hyun

AU - Lee, Hae Min

AU - Son, Taeil

AU - Hyung, WooJin

AU - Kim, Hyoung Il

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Surgical techniques have evolved tremendously over this past century. To maximize the efficacy and minimize the invasiveness of laparoscopic surgery, researchers have sought to implement wider application of robotics. Nevertheless, both optimism without sound evidence and fear of new technology obscure the appropriate uses of robotic surgery. In the present review, we attempted to provide a balanced perspective on the current state of robotic gastrectomy, outlining evidence and opportunities for the use thereof. Although evidence is limited, the use of robotics is feasible for gastric cancer surgery, and less than 10 cases of robotic surgery are needed to become proficient therein. Compared to the clinical impact of laparoscopy on gastric cancer surgery, the additional benefits of robotic surgery to patients seem to be limited. Despite additional costs and longer surgeries, robotic surgery reportedly does not offer surgical outcomes superior to those for laparoscopic surgery, according to a recent multicenter study. Meanwhile, however, our in-depth review of retrospective and prospective reports revealed that robots could expand the indications of minimally invasive gastrectomy for patients requiring total gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection. Moreover, we found that robotic gastrectomy is associated with a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes, less bleeding, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stay, compared to laparoscopic gastrectomy. Accordingly, new surgical approaches using advanced technologies, such as near infrared detectors, the Tilepro® multi-input display, dual consoles, and the Single-Site® system, are under investigation. In conclusion, measuring the additional benefits of robotic over laparoscopic surgery would be difficult and clinically insignificant. Thus, developing new surgical procedures that extend the benefits of conventional laparoscopic surgery to patients in whom minimally invasive surgery would not be possible is necessary to justify the greater use of robotic surgery.

AB - Surgical techniques have evolved tremendously over this past century. To maximize the efficacy and minimize the invasiveness of laparoscopic surgery, researchers have sought to implement wider application of robotics. Nevertheless, both optimism without sound evidence and fear of new technology obscure the appropriate uses of robotic surgery. In the present review, we attempted to provide a balanced perspective on the current state of robotic gastrectomy, outlining evidence and opportunities for the use thereof. Although evidence is limited, the use of robotics is feasible for gastric cancer surgery, and less than 10 cases of robotic surgery are needed to become proficient therein. Compared to the clinical impact of laparoscopy on gastric cancer surgery, the additional benefits of robotic surgery to patients seem to be limited. Despite additional costs and longer surgeries, robotic surgery reportedly does not offer surgical outcomes superior to those for laparoscopic surgery, according to a recent multicenter study. Meanwhile, however, our in-depth review of retrospective and prospective reports revealed that robots could expand the indications of minimally invasive gastrectomy for patients requiring total gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection. Moreover, we found that robotic gastrectomy is associated with a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes, less bleeding, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stay, compared to laparoscopic gastrectomy. Accordingly, new surgical approaches using advanced technologies, such as near infrared detectors, the Tilepro® multi-input display, dual consoles, and the Single-Site® system, are under investigation. In conclusion, measuring the additional benefits of robotic over laparoscopic surgery would be difficult and clinically insignificant. Thus, developing new surgical procedures that extend the benefits of conventional laparoscopic surgery to patients in whom minimally invasive surgery would not be possible is necessary to justify the greater use of robotic surgery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006412336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006412336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21037/tgh.2016.03.21

DO - 10.21037/tgh.2016.03.21

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85006412336

VL - 2016

JO - Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology

JF - Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology

SN - 2224-476X

IS - APR

M1 - 28

ER -