Robust priority for strategic environmental assessment with incomplete information using multi-criteria decision making analysis

Daeryong Park, Yeonjoo Kim, Myoung Jin Um, Sung-Uk Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigates how the priority rankings for dam construction sites vary with multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques and generation approaches for incomplete information. Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) seeks to recommend sustainable dam construction sites based on their environmental and ecological impacts in a long-term plan for dam construction (LPDC) in South Korea. However, if specific information is missing, the SEA is less useful for choosing a dam construction site. In this study, we applied AHP, ELECTRE III, PROMETHEE II and Compromise Programming as MCDM techniques, and used binomial and uniform distributions to generate missing information. We considered five dam site selection situations and compared the results as they depended on both MCDM techniques and information generation methods. The binomial generation method showed the most obvious priorities. All MCDM techniques showed similar priorities in the dam site selection results except for ELECTREE III. The results demonstrate that selecting an appropriate MCDM technique is more important than the data generation method. However, using binomial distribution to generate missing information is more effective in providing a robust priority than uniform distribution, which is a commonly used technique.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10233-10249
Number of pages17
JournalSustainability (Switzerland)
Volume7
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

decision making criterion
strategic environmental assessment
dam construction
Dams
Decision making
decision making
site selection
Site selection
dam
ecological impact
South Korea
compromise
ranking
environmental impact
programming
analysis
Environmental assessments
method
distribution

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{bab376e46936451c9495610ec1efeca4,
title = "Robust priority for strategic environmental assessment with incomplete information using multi-criteria decision making analysis",
abstract = "This study investigates how the priority rankings for dam construction sites vary with multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques and generation approaches for incomplete information. Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) seeks to recommend sustainable dam construction sites based on their environmental and ecological impacts in a long-term plan for dam construction (LPDC) in South Korea. However, if specific information is missing, the SEA is less useful for choosing a dam construction site. In this study, we applied AHP, ELECTRE III, PROMETHEE II and Compromise Programming as MCDM techniques, and used binomial and uniform distributions to generate missing information. We considered five dam site selection situations and compared the results as they depended on both MCDM techniques and information generation methods. The binomial generation method showed the most obvious priorities. All MCDM techniques showed similar priorities in the dam site selection results except for ELECTREE III. The results demonstrate that selecting an appropriate MCDM technique is more important than the data generation method. However, using binomial distribution to generate missing information is more effective in providing a robust priority than uniform distribution, which is a commonly used technique.",
author = "Daeryong Park and Yeonjoo Kim and Um, {Myoung Jin} and Sung-Uk Choi",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/su70810233",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "10233--10249",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "8",

}

Robust priority for strategic environmental assessment with incomplete information using multi-criteria decision making analysis. / Park, Daeryong; Kim, Yeonjoo; Um, Myoung Jin; Choi, Sung-Uk.

In: Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 7, No. 8, 01.01.2015, p. 10233-10249.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robust priority for strategic environmental assessment with incomplete information using multi-criteria decision making analysis

AU - Park, Daeryong

AU - Kim, Yeonjoo

AU - Um, Myoung Jin

AU - Choi, Sung-Uk

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - This study investigates how the priority rankings for dam construction sites vary with multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques and generation approaches for incomplete information. Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) seeks to recommend sustainable dam construction sites based on their environmental and ecological impacts in a long-term plan for dam construction (LPDC) in South Korea. However, if specific information is missing, the SEA is less useful for choosing a dam construction site. In this study, we applied AHP, ELECTRE III, PROMETHEE II and Compromise Programming as MCDM techniques, and used binomial and uniform distributions to generate missing information. We considered five dam site selection situations and compared the results as they depended on both MCDM techniques and information generation methods. The binomial generation method showed the most obvious priorities. All MCDM techniques showed similar priorities in the dam site selection results except for ELECTREE III. The results demonstrate that selecting an appropriate MCDM technique is more important than the data generation method. However, using binomial distribution to generate missing information is more effective in providing a robust priority than uniform distribution, which is a commonly used technique.

AB - This study investigates how the priority rankings for dam construction sites vary with multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques and generation approaches for incomplete information. Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) seeks to recommend sustainable dam construction sites based on their environmental and ecological impacts in a long-term plan for dam construction (LPDC) in South Korea. However, if specific information is missing, the SEA is less useful for choosing a dam construction site. In this study, we applied AHP, ELECTRE III, PROMETHEE II and Compromise Programming as MCDM techniques, and used binomial and uniform distributions to generate missing information. We considered five dam site selection situations and compared the results as they depended on both MCDM techniques and information generation methods. The binomial generation method showed the most obvious priorities. All MCDM techniques showed similar priorities in the dam site selection results except for ELECTREE III. The results demonstrate that selecting an appropriate MCDM technique is more important than the data generation method. However, using binomial distribution to generate missing information is more effective in providing a robust priority than uniform distribution, which is a commonly used technique.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940534459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940534459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/su70810233

DO - 10.3390/su70810233

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 10233

EP - 10249

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 8

ER -