Same material different recycling standards

comparing the municipal solid waste standards of the European Union, South Korea and the USA

Seejeen Park, T. J. Lah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Extant comparative research in municipal solid waste (MSW) management has conducted analyses across multiple countries and regions in an attempt to identify successful MSW management practices and increase MSW recycling. Furthermore, international organisations such as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) have published annual reports discussing the status quo of MSW management and recycling practices in their member countries. As the characterisation of waste and recyclables varies across nations, comparability problems can occur. Nonetheless, extant research has not yet conducted a national-level comparison of MSW characterisation and calculation methods across multiple countries. The current study attempts to fill this gap by investigating the variations in MSW definitions and calculation standards in the European Union (EU), South Korea and the USA The findings indicate that recycling performance fluctuates significantly depending on which standard is adopted. South Korea is found to use the most conservative standards, yet its recycling rate is the highest regardless of which standard is applied. Future directions and implications for both research and practice are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)80-93
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Environment and Waste Management
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Municipal solid waste
municipal solid waste
Recycling
European Union
recycling
Waste management
waste management
United Nations Environment Program
international organization
OECD
material
management practice
Economics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Waste Management and Disposal

Cite this

@article{b4e7f6b0a0fe4f498874032f8ea24e9c,
title = "Same material different recycling standards: comparing the municipal solid waste standards of the European Union, South Korea and the USA",
abstract = "Extant comparative research in municipal solid waste (MSW) management has conducted analyses across multiple countries and regions in an attempt to identify successful MSW management practices and increase MSW recycling. Furthermore, international organisations such as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) have published annual reports discussing the status quo of MSW management and recycling practices in their member countries. As the characterisation of waste and recyclables varies across nations, comparability problems can occur. Nonetheless, extant research has not yet conducted a national-level comparison of MSW characterisation and calculation methods across multiple countries. The current study attempts to fill this gap by investigating the variations in MSW definitions and calculation standards in the European Union (EU), South Korea and the USA The findings indicate that recycling performance fluctuates significantly depending on which standard is adopted. South Korea is found to use the most conservative standards, yet its recycling rate is the highest regardless of which standard is applied. Future directions and implications for both research and practice are discussed.",
author = "Seejeen Park and Lah, {T. J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1504/IJEWM.2018.091326",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "80--93",
journal = "International Journal of Environment and Waste Management",
issn = "1478-9876",
publisher = "Inderscience Enterprises Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Same material different recycling standards

T2 - comparing the municipal solid waste standards of the European Union, South Korea and the USA

AU - Park, Seejeen

AU - Lah, T. J.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Extant comparative research in municipal solid waste (MSW) management has conducted analyses across multiple countries and regions in an attempt to identify successful MSW management practices and increase MSW recycling. Furthermore, international organisations such as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) have published annual reports discussing the status quo of MSW management and recycling practices in their member countries. As the characterisation of waste and recyclables varies across nations, comparability problems can occur. Nonetheless, extant research has not yet conducted a national-level comparison of MSW characterisation and calculation methods across multiple countries. The current study attempts to fill this gap by investigating the variations in MSW definitions and calculation standards in the European Union (EU), South Korea and the USA The findings indicate that recycling performance fluctuates significantly depending on which standard is adopted. South Korea is found to use the most conservative standards, yet its recycling rate is the highest regardless of which standard is applied. Future directions and implications for both research and practice are discussed.

AB - Extant comparative research in municipal solid waste (MSW) management has conducted analyses across multiple countries and regions in an attempt to identify successful MSW management practices and increase MSW recycling. Furthermore, international organisations such as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) have published annual reports discussing the status quo of MSW management and recycling practices in their member countries. As the characterisation of waste and recyclables varies across nations, comparability problems can occur. Nonetheless, extant research has not yet conducted a national-level comparison of MSW characterisation and calculation methods across multiple countries. The current study attempts to fill this gap by investigating the variations in MSW definitions and calculation standards in the European Union (EU), South Korea and the USA The findings indicate that recycling performance fluctuates significantly depending on which standard is adopted. South Korea is found to use the most conservative standards, yet its recycling rate is the highest regardless of which standard is applied. Future directions and implications for both research and practice are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046247723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046247723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1504/IJEWM.2018.091326

DO - 10.1504/IJEWM.2018.091326

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 80

EP - 93

JO - International Journal of Environment and Waste Management

JF - International Journal of Environment and Waste Management

SN - 1478-9876

IS - 1

ER -