Scientometrics of big science: A case study of research in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Jian Zhang, Michael S. Vogeley, Chaomei Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Large-scale scientific projects have become a major impetus of scientific advances. But few studies have specifically analyzed how those projects bolster scientific research. We address this question from a scientometrics perspective. By analyzing the bibliographic records of papers relevant to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), we found that the SDSS helped scientists from many countries further develop their own research; investigators initially formed large research groups to tackle key problems, while later papers involved fewer authors; and the number of research topics increased but the diversity of topics remains stable. Furthermore, the entropy analysis method has proven valuable in terms of analyzing patterns of research topics at a macroscopic level.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalScientometrics
Volume86
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Jan 1

Fingerprint

science
entropy
Entropy
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

@article{2622423390e5422eae7b15d249d459ea,
title = "Scientometrics of big science: A case study of research in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey",
abstract = "Large-scale scientific projects have become a major impetus of scientific advances. But few studies have specifically analyzed how those projects bolster scientific research. We address this question from a scientometrics perspective. By analyzing the bibliographic records of papers relevant to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), we found that the SDSS helped scientists from many countries further develop their own research; investigators initially formed large research groups to tackle key problems, while later papers involved fewer authors; and the number of research topics increased but the diversity of topics remains stable. Furthermore, the entropy analysis method has proven valuable in terms of analyzing patterns of research topics at a macroscopic level.",
author = "Jian Zhang and Vogeley, {Michael S.} and Chaomei Chen",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11192-010-0318-1",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Scientometrics",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

Scientometrics of big science : A case study of research in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. / Zhang, Jian; Vogeley, Michael S.; Chen, Chaomei.

In: Scientometrics, Vol. 86, No. 1, 01.01.2011, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scientometrics of big science

T2 - A case study of research in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

AU - Zhang, Jian

AU - Vogeley, Michael S.

AU - Chen, Chaomei

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Large-scale scientific projects have become a major impetus of scientific advances. But few studies have specifically analyzed how those projects bolster scientific research. We address this question from a scientometrics perspective. By analyzing the bibliographic records of papers relevant to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), we found that the SDSS helped scientists from many countries further develop their own research; investigators initially formed large research groups to tackle key problems, while later papers involved fewer authors; and the number of research topics increased but the diversity of topics remains stable. Furthermore, the entropy analysis method has proven valuable in terms of analyzing patterns of research topics at a macroscopic level.

AB - Large-scale scientific projects have become a major impetus of scientific advances. But few studies have specifically analyzed how those projects bolster scientific research. We address this question from a scientometrics perspective. By analyzing the bibliographic records of papers relevant to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), we found that the SDSS helped scientists from many countries further develop their own research; investigators initially formed large research groups to tackle key problems, while later papers involved fewer authors; and the number of research topics increased but the diversity of topics remains stable. Furthermore, the entropy analysis method has proven valuable in terms of analyzing patterns of research topics at a macroscopic level.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649923749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649923749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11192-010-0318-1

DO - 10.1007/s11192-010-0318-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78649923749

VL - 86

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

SN - 0138-9130

IS - 1

ER -