Second-look endoscopy after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection for reducing delayed postoperative bleeding

Chan Hyuk Park, Jun Chul Park, Hyuk Lee, Sung Kwan Shin, Sang Kil Lee, Yong Chan Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Aims: This stuy evaluated the role of a secondlook endoscopy after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients without signs of bleeding. Methods: Between March 2011 and March 2012, 407 patients with gastric neoplasms who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for 445 lesions were retrospectively reviewed. After the patients had undergone endoscopic submucosal dissection, they were allocated to two groups (with or without second-look endoscopy) according to the following endoscopy. The postoperative bleeding risk of the lesions was not considered when allocating the patients. Results: The delayed postoperative bleeding rates did not differ between the two groups (with vs without second-look endoscopy, 3.0% vs 2.1%; p=0.546). However, a tumor in the upper-third of the stomach (odds ratio [OR], 5.353; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.075 to 26.650) and specimen size greater than 40 mm (OR, 4.794; 95% CI, 1.307 to 17.588) were both independent risk factors for delayed postoperative bleeding. Additionally, second-look endoscopy was not related to reduced delayed postoperative bleeding. However, delayed postoperative bleeding in the patients who did not undergo a second-look endoscopy occurred significantly earlier than that in patients who underwent a second-look endoscopy (4.5 and 14.0 days, respectively, p=0.022). Conclusions: A routine second-look endoscopy after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection is not necessary for all patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-51
Number of pages9
JournalGut and liver
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Endoscopy
Stomach
Hemorrhage
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Stomach Neoplasms
Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Park, Chan Hyuk ; Park, Jun Chul ; Lee, Hyuk ; Shin, Sung Kwan ; Lee, Sang Kil ; Lee, Yong Chan. / Second-look endoscopy after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection for reducing delayed postoperative bleeding. In: Gut and liver. 2015 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 43-51.
@article{096cdb24fa5448f9a8d6388a3351dc41,
title = "Second-look endoscopy after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection for reducing delayed postoperative bleeding",
abstract = "Background/Aims: This stuy evaluated the role of a secondlook endoscopy after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients without signs of bleeding. Methods: Between March 2011 and March 2012, 407 patients with gastric neoplasms who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for 445 lesions were retrospectively reviewed. After the patients had undergone endoscopic submucosal dissection, they were allocated to two groups (with or without second-look endoscopy) according to the following endoscopy. The postoperative bleeding risk of the lesions was not considered when allocating the patients. Results: The delayed postoperative bleeding rates did not differ between the two groups (with vs without second-look endoscopy, 3.0{\%} vs 2.1{\%}; p=0.546). However, a tumor in the upper-third of the stomach (odds ratio [OR], 5.353; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 1.075 to 26.650) and specimen size greater than 40 mm (OR, 4.794; 95{\%} CI, 1.307 to 17.588) were both independent risk factors for delayed postoperative bleeding. Additionally, second-look endoscopy was not related to reduced delayed postoperative bleeding. However, delayed postoperative bleeding in the patients who did not undergo a second-look endoscopy occurred significantly earlier than that in patients who underwent a second-look endoscopy (4.5 and 14.0 days, respectively, p=0.022). Conclusions: A routine second-look endoscopy after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection is not necessary for all patients.",
author = "Park, {Chan Hyuk} and Park, {Jun Chul} and Hyuk Lee and Shin, {Sung Kwan} and Lee, {Sang Kil} and Lee, {Yong Chan}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5009/gnl13252",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "43--51",
journal = "Gut and Liver",
issn = "1976-2283",
publisher = "Joe Bok Chung",
number = "1",

}

Second-look endoscopy after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection for reducing delayed postoperative bleeding. / Park, Chan Hyuk; Park, Jun Chul; Lee, Hyuk; Shin, Sung Kwan; Lee, Sang Kil; Lee, Yong Chan.

In: Gut and liver, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 43-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Second-look endoscopy after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection for reducing delayed postoperative bleeding

AU - Park, Chan Hyuk

AU - Park, Jun Chul

AU - Lee, Hyuk

AU - Shin, Sung Kwan

AU - Lee, Sang Kil

AU - Lee, Yong Chan

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background/Aims: This stuy evaluated the role of a secondlook endoscopy after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients without signs of bleeding. Methods: Between March 2011 and March 2012, 407 patients with gastric neoplasms who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for 445 lesions were retrospectively reviewed. After the patients had undergone endoscopic submucosal dissection, they were allocated to two groups (with or without second-look endoscopy) according to the following endoscopy. The postoperative bleeding risk of the lesions was not considered when allocating the patients. Results: The delayed postoperative bleeding rates did not differ between the two groups (with vs without second-look endoscopy, 3.0% vs 2.1%; p=0.546). However, a tumor in the upper-third of the stomach (odds ratio [OR], 5.353; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.075 to 26.650) and specimen size greater than 40 mm (OR, 4.794; 95% CI, 1.307 to 17.588) were both independent risk factors for delayed postoperative bleeding. Additionally, second-look endoscopy was not related to reduced delayed postoperative bleeding. However, delayed postoperative bleeding in the patients who did not undergo a second-look endoscopy occurred significantly earlier than that in patients who underwent a second-look endoscopy (4.5 and 14.0 days, respectively, p=0.022). Conclusions: A routine second-look endoscopy after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection is not necessary for all patients.

AB - Background/Aims: This stuy evaluated the role of a secondlook endoscopy after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients without signs of bleeding. Methods: Between March 2011 and March 2012, 407 patients with gastric neoplasms who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for 445 lesions were retrospectively reviewed. After the patients had undergone endoscopic submucosal dissection, they were allocated to two groups (with or without second-look endoscopy) according to the following endoscopy. The postoperative bleeding risk of the lesions was not considered when allocating the patients. Results: The delayed postoperative bleeding rates did not differ between the two groups (with vs without second-look endoscopy, 3.0% vs 2.1%; p=0.546). However, a tumor in the upper-third of the stomach (odds ratio [OR], 5.353; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.075 to 26.650) and specimen size greater than 40 mm (OR, 4.794; 95% CI, 1.307 to 17.588) were both independent risk factors for delayed postoperative bleeding. Additionally, second-look endoscopy was not related to reduced delayed postoperative bleeding. However, delayed postoperative bleeding in the patients who did not undergo a second-look endoscopy occurred significantly earlier than that in patients who underwent a second-look endoscopy (4.5 and 14.0 days, respectively, p=0.022). Conclusions: A routine second-look endoscopy after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection is not necessary for all patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919381981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919381981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5009/gnl13252

DO - 10.5009/gnl13252

M3 - Article

C2 - 25170062

AN - SCOPUS:84919381981

VL - 9

SP - 43

EP - 51

JO - Gut and Liver

JF - Gut and Liver

SN - 1976-2283

IS - 1

ER -