Seismotectonic Properties and Zonation of the Far-Eastern Eurasian Plate Around the Korean Peninsula

Tae Kyung Hong, Seongjun Park, Soung Eil Houng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Regional seismotectonics provides crucial information for seismic hazard analysis, which is difficult to address with short-term earthquake records. The far-eastern Eurasian plate around the Korean Peninsula presents a stable intraplate environment with diffuse seismicity, of which responsible tectonics and active faults are difficult to identify. Combined analysis of instrumental and historical earthquake records is required for assessment of long-term seismicity properties. Seismotectonic provinces are identified from the spatial distribution of seismicity properties controlled by the medium properties and stress field. The boundaries of the seismotectonic provinces are defined considering the medium properties that can be inferred from geological, geophysical and tectonic features. The Gutenberg–Richter frequency–magnitude relationships and maximum magnitudes for the seismotectonic provinces are determined using instrumental and historical earthquake records. The validity of maximum magnitude estimation is tested with synthetic data. A parametric method, the Tate–Pisarenko method, produces more accurate estimates than non-parametric methods. A modified Tate–Pisarenko method is proposed for estimation of maximum magnitudes for incomplete short-term earthquake catalogs. The maximum magnitude of events for the whole region is approximately the same as the average of the maximum magnitudes of events for subdivided provinces, causing apparent variation in maximum magnitudes depending on the number of seismotectonic provinces. Consideration of a reasonable number of seismotectonic provinces may be needed for proper assessment of seismic hazard potentials is recommended. The combined analysis of historical and instrumental earthquake records suggests maximum magnitudes greater than 7 around the peninsula.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1175-1195
Number of pages21
JournalPure and Applied Geophysics
Volume173
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Apr 1

Fingerprint

seismotectonics
Eurasian plate
peninsulas
zonation
Earthquakes
earthquakes
Tectonics
seismicity
earthquake
Hazards
seismic hazard
hazards
tectonics
Spatial distribution
earthquake catalogue
tectonic feature
active fault
stress field
stress distribution
catalogs

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geophysics
  • Geochemistry and Petrology

Cite this

@article{1edc5197a1cc488faccd7d1a2b6ed80c,
title = "Seismotectonic Properties and Zonation of the Far-Eastern Eurasian Plate Around the Korean Peninsula",
abstract = "Regional seismotectonics provides crucial information for seismic hazard analysis, which is difficult to address with short-term earthquake records. The far-eastern Eurasian plate around the Korean Peninsula presents a stable intraplate environment with diffuse seismicity, of which responsible tectonics and active faults are difficult to identify. Combined analysis of instrumental and historical earthquake records is required for assessment of long-term seismicity properties. Seismotectonic provinces are identified from the spatial distribution of seismicity properties controlled by the medium properties and stress field. The boundaries of the seismotectonic provinces are defined considering the medium properties that can be inferred from geological, geophysical and tectonic features. The Gutenberg–Richter frequency–magnitude relationships and maximum magnitudes for the seismotectonic provinces are determined using instrumental and historical earthquake records. The validity of maximum magnitude estimation is tested with synthetic data. A parametric method, the Tate–Pisarenko method, produces more accurate estimates than non-parametric methods. A modified Tate–Pisarenko method is proposed for estimation of maximum magnitudes for incomplete short-term earthquake catalogs. The maximum magnitude of events for the whole region is approximately the same as the average of the maximum magnitudes of events for subdivided provinces, causing apparent variation in maximum magnitudes depending on the number of seismotectonic provinces. Consideration of a reasonable number of seismotectonic provinces may be needed for proper assessment of seismic hazard potentials is recommended. The combined analysis of historical and instrumental earthquake records suggests maximum magnitudes greater than 7 around the peninsula.",
author = "Hong, {Tae Kyung} and Seongjun Park and Houng, {Soung Eil}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00024-015-1170-2",
language = "English",
volume = "173",
pages = "1175--1195",
journal = "Pure and Applied Geophysics",
issn = "0033-4553",
publisher = "Birkhauser Verlag Basel",
number = "4",

}

Seismotectonic Properties and Zonation of the Far-Eastern Eurasian Plate Around the Korean Peninsula. / Hong, Tae Kyung; Park, Seongjun; Houng, Soung Eil.

In: Pure and Applied Geophysics, Vol. 173, No. 4, 01.04.2016, p. 1175-1195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seismotectonic Properties and Zonation of the Far-Eastern Eurasian Plate Around the Korean Peninsula

AU - Hong, Tae Kyung

AU - Park, Seongjun

AU - Houng, Soung Eil

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Regional seismotectonics provides crucial information for seismic hazard analysis, which is difficult to address with short-term earthquake records. The far-eastern Eurasian plate around the Korean Peninsula presents a stable intraplate environment with diffuse seismicity, of which responsible tectonics and active faults are difficult to identify. Combined analysis of instrumental and historical earthquake records is required for assessment of long-term seismicity properties. Seismotectonic provinces are identified from the spatial distribution of seismicity properties controlled by the medium properties and stress field. The boundaries of the seismotectonic provinces are defined considering the medium properties that can be inferred from geological, geophysical and tectonic features. The Gutenberg–Richter frequency–magnitude relationships and maximum magnitudes for the seismotectonic provinces are determined using instrumental and historical earthquake records. The validity of maximum magnitude estimation is tested with synthetic data. A parametric method, the Tate–Pisarenko method, produces more accurate estimates than non-parametric methods. A modified Tate–Pisarenko method is proposed for estimation of maximum magnitudes for incomplete short-term earthquake catalogs. The maximum magnitude of events for the whole region is approximately the same as the average of the maximum magnitudes of events for subdivided provinces, causing apparent variation in maximum magnitudes depending on the number of seismotectonic provinces. Consideration of a reasonable number of seismotectonic provinces may be needed for proper assessment of seismic hazard potentials is recommended. The combined analysis of historical and instrumental earthquake records suggests maximum magnitudes greater than 7 around the peninsula.

AB - Regional seismotectonics provides crucial information for seismic hazard analysis, which is difficult to address with short-term earthquake records. The far-eastern Eurasian plate around the Korean Peninsula presents a stable intraplate environment with diffuse seismicity, of which responsible tectonics and active faults are difficult to identify. Combined analysis of instrumental and historical earthquake records is required for assessment of long-term seismicity properties. Seismotectonic provinces are identified from the spatial distribution of seismicity properties controlled by the medium properties and stress field. The boundaries of the seismotectonic provinces are defined considering the medium properties that can be inferred from geological, geophysical and tectonic features. The Gutenberg–Richter frequency–magnitude relationships and maximum magnitudes for the seismotectonic provinces are determined using instrumental and historical earthquake records. The validity of maximum magnitude estimation is tested with synthetic data. A parametric method, the Tate–Pisarenko method, produces more accurate estimates than non-parametric methods. A modified Tate–Pisarenko method is proposed for estimation of maximum magnitudes for incomplete short-term earthquake catalogs. The maximum magnitude of events for the whole region is approximately the same as the average of the maximum magnitudes of events for subdivided provinces, causing apparent variation in maximum magnitudes depending on the number of seismotectonic provinces. Consideration of a reasonable number of seismotectonic provinces may be needed for proper assessment of seismic hazard potentials is recommended. The combined analysis of historical and instrumental earthquake records suggests maximum magnitudes greater than 7 around the peninsula.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962648216&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962648216&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00024-015-1170-2

DO - 10.1007/s00024-015-1170-2

M3 - Article

VL - 173

SP - 1175

EP - 1195

JO - Pure and Applied Geophysics

JF - Pure and Applied Geophysics

SN - 0033-4553

IS - 4

ER -