Self-transformation and civil society: Lockean vs. Confucian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although contemporary Confucianists tend to view Western liberalism as pitting the individual against society, recent liberal scholarship has vigorously claimed that liberal polity is indeed grounded in the self-transformation that produces "liberal virtues." To meet this challenge, this essay presents a sophisticated Confucian critique of liberalism by arguing that there is an appreciable contrast between liberal and Confucian self-transformation and between liberal and Confucian virtues. By contrasting Locke and Confucius, key representatives of each tradition, this essay shows that both liberalism and Confucianism aim to reconstruct a society freed from antisocial passions entailing a vicious politics of resentment, and yet come to differing ethical and political resolutions. My key claim is that what makes Confucian self-cultivation so distinctive is the incorporation of ritual propriety (li) within it, whereas liberal self-transformation that relies heavily on a method of self-control comes back to the problem that it originally set out to overcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)383-401
Number of pages19
JournalDao
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Self-transformation
Civil Society
John Locke
Confucian
Liberalism
Self-control
Self-cultivation
Polity
Confucius
Pitting
Confucianism
Resentment
Passion

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Cite this

@article{49e58c27f10d48cca3d4f257c255455d,
title = "Self-transformation and civil society: Lockean vs. Confucian",
abstract = "Although contemporary Confucianists tend to view Western liberalism as pitting the individual against society, recent liberal scholarship has vigorously claimed that liberal polity is indeed grounded in the self-transformation that produces {"}liberal virtues.{"} To meet this challenge, this essay presents a sophisticated Confucian critique of liberalism by arguing that there is an appreciable contrast between liberal and Confucian self-transformation and between liberal and Confucian virtues. By contrasting Locke and Confucius, key representatives of each tradition, this essay shows that both liberalism and Confucianism aim to reconstruct a society freed from antisocial passions entailing a vicious politics of resentment, and yet come to differing ethical and political resolutions. My key claim is that what makes Confucian self-cultivation so distinctive is the incorporation of ritual propriety (li) within it, whereas liberal self-transformation that relies heavily on a method of self-control comes back to the problem that it originally set out to overcome.",
author = "Kim Sungmoon",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11712-009-9136-7",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "383--401",
journal = "Dao",
issn = "1540-3009",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

Self-transformation and civil society : Lockean vs. Confucian. / Sungmoon, Kim.

In: Dao, Vol. 8, No. 4, 01.11.2009, p. 383-401.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-transformation and civil society

T2 - Lockean vs. Confucian

AU - Sungmoon, Kim

PY - 2009/11/1

Y1 - 2009/11/1

N2 - Although contemporary Confucianists tend to view Western liberalism as pitting the individual against society, recent liberal scholarship has vigorously claimed that liberal polity is indeed grounded in the self-transformation that produces "liberal virtues." To meet this challenge, this essay presents a sophisticated Confucian critique of liberalism by arguing that there is an appreciable contrast between liberal and Confucian self-transformation and between liberal and Confucian virtues. By contrasting Locke and Confucius, key representatives of each tradition, this essay shows that both liberalism and Confucianism aim to reconstruct a society freed from antisocial passions entailing a vicious politics of resentment, and yet come to differing ethical and political resolutions. My key claim is that what makes Confucian self-cultivation so distinctive is the incorporation of ritual propriety (li) within it, whereas liberal self-transformation that relies heavily on a method of self-control comes back to the problem that it originally set out to overcome.

AB - Although contemporary Confucianists tend to view Western liberalism as pitting the individual against society, recent liberal scholarship has vigorously claimed that liberal polity is indeed grounded in the self-transformation that produces "liberal virtues." To meet this challenge, this essay presents a sophisticated Confucian critique of liberalism by arguing that there is an appreciable contrast between liberal and Confucian self-transformation and between liberal and Confucian virtues. By contrasting Locke and Confucius, key representatives of each tradition, this essay shows that both liberalism and Confucianism aim to reconstruct a society freed from antisocial passions entailing a vicious politics of resentment, and yet come to differing ethical and political resolutions. My key claim is that what makes Confucian self-cultivation so distinctive is the incorporation of ritual propriety (li) within it, whereas liberal self-transformation that relies heavily on a method of self-control comes back to the problem that it originally set out to overcome.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949274547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949274547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11712-009-9136-7

DO - 10.1007/s11712-009-9136-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77949274547

VL - 8

SP - 383

EP - 401

JO - Dao

JF - Dao

SN - 1540-3009

IS - 4

ER -