Setting a health policy research agenda for controlling cancer burden in Korea

Sung In Jang, Kyoung Hee Cho, Sun Jung Kim, Kwang Sig Lee, Euncheol Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of study was to provide suggestions for prioritizing research in effort to reduce cancer burden in Korea based on a comprehensive analysis of cancer burden and Delphi consensus among cancer experts. Materials and Methods: Twenty research plans covering 10 topics were selected based on an assessment of the literature, and e-mail surveys were analyzed using a two-round modified Delphi method. Thirty-four out of 79 experts were selected from four organizations to participate in round one, and 21 experts among them had completed round two. Each item had two questions; one regarding the agreement of the topic as a priority item to reduce cancer burden, and the other about the importance of the item on a nine-point scale. A consensus was defined to be an average lower coefficient of variation with less than 30% in importance. Results: Seven plans that satisfied the three criteria were selected as priority research plans for reducing cancer burden. These plans are "research into advanced clinical guidelines for thyroid cancer given the current issue with over-diagnosis," "research into smoking management plans through price and non-price cigarette policy initiatives," "research into ways to measure the quality of cancer care," "research on policy development to expand hospice care," "research into the spread and management of Helicobacter pylori," "research on palliative care in a clinical setting," and "research into alternative mammography methods to increase the accuracy of breast cancer screenings." Conclusion: The seven plans identified in this study should be prioritized to reduce the burden of cancer in Korea. We suggest that policy makers and administrators study and invest significant effort in these plans.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)149-157
Number of pages9
JournalCancer Research and Treatment
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Korea
Health Policy
Research
Neoplasms
Administrative Personnel
Consensus
Hospice Care
Quality of Health Care
Policy Making
Postal Service
Mammography
Palliative Care
Early Detection of Cancer
Thyroid Neoplasms
Helicobacter pylori
Tobacco Products
Smoking
Organizations
Guidelines
Breast Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Jang, Sung In ; Cho, Kyoung Hee ; Kim, Sun Jung ; Lee, Kwang Sig ; Park, Euncheol. / Setting a health policy research agenda for controlling cancer burden in Korea. In: Cancer Research and Treatment. 2015 ; Vol. 47, No. 2. pp. 149-157.
@article{f2cb62ce0e994306b8cbb4091e6fb7ad,
title = "Setting a health policy research agenda for controlling cancer burden in Korea",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of study was to provide suggestions for prioritizing research in effort to reduce cancer burden in Korea based on a comprehensive analysis of cancer burden and Delphi consensus among cancer experts. Materials and Methods: Twenty research plans covering 10 topics were selected based on an assessment of the literature, and e-mail surveys were analyzed using a two-round modified Delphi method. Thirty-four out of 79 experts were selected from four organizations to participate in round one, and 21 experts among them had completed round two. Each item had two questions; one regarding the agreement of the topic as a priority item to reduce cancer burden, and the other about the importance of the item on a nine-point scale. A consensus was defined to be an average lower coefficient of variation with less than 30{\%} in importance. Results: Seven plans that satisfied the three criteria were selected as priority research plans for reducing cancer burden. These plans are {"}research into advanced clinical guidelines for thyroid cancer given the current issue with over-diagnosis,{"} {"}research into smoking management plans through price and non-price cigarette policy initiatives,{"} {"}research into ways to measure the quality of cancer care,{"} {"}research on policy development to expand hospice care,{"} {"}research into the spread and management of Helicobacter pylori,{"} {"}research on palliative care in a clinical setting,{"} and {"}research into alternative mammography methods to increase the accuracy of breast cancer screenings.{"} Conclusion: The seven plans identified in this study should be prioritized to reduce the burden of cancer in Korea. We suggest that policy makers and administrators study and invest significant effort in these plans.",
author = "Jang, {Sung In} and Cho, {Kyoung Hee} and Kim, {Sun Jung} and Lee, {Kwang Sig} and Euncheol Park",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4143/crt.2013.167",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "149--157",
journal = "Cancer Research and Treatment",
issn = "1598-2998",
publisher = "Korean Cancer Association",
number = "2",

}

Setting a health policy research agenda for controlling cancer burden in Korea. / Jang, Sung In; Cho, Kyoung Hee; Kim, Sun Jung; Lee, Kwang Sig; Park, Euncheol.

In: Cancer Research and Treatment, Vol. 47, No. 2, 01.01.2015, p. 149-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Setting a health policy research agenda for controlling cancer burden in Korea

AU - Jang, Sung In

AU - Cho, Kyoung Hee

AU - Kim, Sun Jung

AU - Lee, Kwang Sig

AU - Park, Euncheol

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The aim of study was to provide suggestions for prioritizing research in effort to reduce cancer burden in Korea based on a comprehensive analysis of cancer burden and Delphi consensus among cancer experts. Materials and Methods: Twenty research plans covering 10 topics were selected based on an assessment of the literature, and e-mail surveys were analyzed using a two-round modified Delphi method. Thirty-four out of 79 experts were selected from four organizations to participate in round one, and 21 experts among them had completed round two. Each item had two questions; one regarding the agreement of the topic as a priority item to reduce cancer burden, and the other about the importance of the item on a nine-point scale. A consensus was defined to be an average lower coefficient of variation with less than 30% in importance. Results: Seven plans that satisfied the three criteria were selected as priority research plans for reducing cancer burden. These plans are "research into advanced clinical guidelines for thyroid cancer given the current issue with over-diagnosis," "research into smoking management plans through price and non-price cigarette policy initiatives," "research into ways to measure the quality of cancer care," "research on policy development to expand hospice care," "research into the spread and management of Helicobacter pylori," "research on palliative care in a clinical setting," and "research into alternative mammography methods to increase the accuracy of breast cancer screenings." Conclusion: The seven plans identified in this study should be prioritized to reduce the burden of cancer in Korea. We suggest that policy makers and administrators study and invest significant effort in these plans.

AB - Purpose: The aim of study was to provide suggestions for prioritizing research in effort to reduce cancer burden in Korea based on a comprehensive analysis of cancer burden and Delphi consensus among cancer experts. Materials and Methods: Twenty research plans covering 10 topics were selected based on an assessment of the literature, and e-mail surveys were analyzed using a two-round modified Delphi method. Thirty-four out of 79 experts were selected from four organizations to participate in round one, and 21 experts among them had completed round two. Each item had two questions; one regarding the agreement of the topic as a priority item to reduce cancer burden, and the other about the importance of the item on a nine-point scale. A consensus was defined to be an average lower coefficient of variation with less than 30% in importance. Results: Seven plans that satisfied the three criteria were selected as priority research plans for reducing cancer burden. These plans are "research into advanced clinical guidelines for thyroid cancer given the current issue with over-diagnosis," "research into smoking management plans through price and non-price cigarette policy initiatives," "research into ways to measure the quality of cancer care," "research on policy development to expand hospice care," "research into the spread and management of Helicobacter pylori," "research on palliative care in a clinical setting," and "research into alternative mammography methods to increase the accuracy of breast cancer screenings." Conclusion: The seven plans identified in this study should be prioritized to reduce the burden of cancer in Korea. We suggest that policy makers and administrators study and invest significant effort in these plans.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928552195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928552195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4143/crt.2013.167

DO - 10.4143/crt.2013.167

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 149

EP - 157

JO - Cancer Research and Treatment

JF - Cancer Research and Treatment

SN - 1598-2998

IS - 2

ER -