Setting national priorities for quality assessment of health care services in Korea

Woohyun Cho, Sunhee Lee, Hye Young Kang, Myongkeun Kang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To identify target services and determine national priorities among those services identified for a national quality assessment program of the Health Insurance Review Agency (HIRA) in Korea. Design. Target services were identified from published sources addressing quality problems, various quality-monitoring programs in other countries, suggestions from 26 medical specialty associations in Korea, and frequently reported consumer claims. Three steps were involved in the prioritization decision: (i) development of a set of priority criteria; (ii) expert panel survey to evaluate the extent to which individual services satisfy each of the priority criteria and to calculate mean priority ratings for individual services; and (iii) formation of four levels of priority groups - top, high-middle, middle, and low - according to the allocated priority ratings. Results. Five priority criteria were selected: 'burden of the condition', 'seriousness of the quality problem', 'interest and demand of society', 'acceptability', and 'the feasibility of quality assessment'. Among the 57 services identified as targets for the national quality assessment program, 10 were selected as having a top priority for quality assessment because of their high feasibility rating. These are: cardiac surgery; cataract surgery; tonsillectomy; appendectomy; tooth extraction; usage of albumin/ globulin products; treatments for hypertension, pneumonia, and acute upper respiratory infection; and services provided by clinical laboratory centers. Conclusion. The priority services identified from the studies will assist the HIRA in selecting target services and implementing the national assessment program.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)157-165
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Health Insurance
health care services
Korea
Health Services
Clinical Laboratory Services
Tooth Extraction
Appendectomy
Tonsillectomy
Globulins
Respiratory Tract Infections
Cataract
Thoracic Surgery
Albumins
Pneumonia
Medicine
Hypertension
rating
health insurance
surgery
hypertension

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{e37f4beb65d54a8ebbdfb11ae84023ff,
title = "Setting national priorities for quality assessment of health care services in Korea",
abstract = "Objective. To identify target services and determine national priorities among those services identified for a national quality assessment program of the Health Insurance Review Agency (HIRA) in Korea. Design. Target services were identified from published sources addressing quality problems, various quality-monitoring programs in other countries, suggestions from 26 medical specialty associations in Korea, and frequently reported consumer claims. Three steps were involved in the prioritization decision: (i) development of a set of priority criteria; (ii) expert panel survey to evaluate the extent to which individual services satisfy each of the priority criteria and to calculate mean priority ratings for individual services; and (iii) formation of four levels of priority groups - top, high-middle, middle, and low - according to the allocated priority ratings. Results. Five priority criteria were selected: 'burden of the condition', 'seriousness of the quality problem', 'interest and demand of society', 'acceptability', and 'the feasibility of quality assessment'. Among the 57 services identified as targets for the national quality assessment program, 10 were selected as having a top priority for quality assessment because of their high feasibility rating. These are: cardiac surgery; cataract surgery; tonsillectomy; appendectomy; tooth extraction; usage of albumin/ globulin products; treatments for hypertension, pneumonia, and acute upper respiratory infection; and services provided by clinical laboratory centers. Conclusion. The priority services identified from the studies will assist the HIRA in selecting target services and implementing the national assessment program.",
author = "Woohyun Cho and Sunhee Lee and Kang, {Hye Young} and Myongkeun Kang",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/intqhc/mzi018",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "157--165",
journal = "International Journal for Quality in Health Care",
issn = "1353-4505",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

Setting national priorities for quality assessment of health care services in Korea. / Cho, Woohyun; Lee, Sunhee; Kang, Hye Young; Kang, Myongkeun.

In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.04.2005, p. 157-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Setting national priorities for quality assessment of health care services in Korea

AU - Cho, Woohyun

AU - Lee, Sunhee

AU - Kang, Hye Young

AU - Kang, Myongkeun

PY - 2005/4/1

Y1 - 2005/4/1

N2 - Objective. To identify target services and determine national priorities among those services identified for a national quality assessment program of the Health Insurance Review Agency (HIRA) in Korea. Design. Target services were identified from published sources addressing quality problems, various quality-monitoring programs in other countries, suggestions from 26 medical specialty associations in Korea, and frequently reported consumer claims. Three steps were involved in the prioritization decision: (i) development of a set of priority criteria; (ii) expert panel survey to evaluate the extent to which individual services satisfy each of the priority criteria and to calculate mean priority ratings for individual services; and (iii) formation of four levels of priority groups - top, high-middle, middle, and low - according to the allocated priority ratings. Results. Five priority criteria were selected: 'burden of the condition', 'seriousness of the quality problem', 'interest and demand of society', 'acceptability', and 'the feasibility of quality assessment'. Among the 57 services identified as targets for the national quality assessment program, 10 were selected as having a top priority for quality assessment because of their high feasibility rating. These are: cardiac surgery; cataract surgery; tonsillectomy; appendectomy; tooth extraction; usage of albumin/ globulin products; treatments for hypertension, pneumonia, and acute upper respiratory infection; and services provided by clinical laboratory centers. Conclusion. The priority services identified from the studies will assist the HIRA in selecting target services and implementing the national assessment program.

AB - Objective. To identify target services and determine national priorities among those services identified for a national quality assessment program of the Health Insurance Review Agency (HIRA) in Korea. Design. Target services were identified from published sources addressing quality problems, various quality-monitoring programs in other countries, suggestions from 26 medical specialty associations in Korea, and frequently reported consumer claims. Three steps were involved in the prioritization decision: (i) development of a set of priority criteria; (ii) expert panel survey to evaluate the extent to which individual services satisfy each of the priority criteria and to calculate mean priority ratings for individual services; and (iii) formation of four levels of priority groups - top, high-middle, middle, and low - according to the allocated priority ratings. Results. Five priority criteria were selected: 'burden of the condition', 'seriousness of the quality problem', 'interest and demand of society', 'acceptability', and 'the feasibility of quality assessment'. Among the 57 services identified as targets for the national quality assessment program, 10 were selected as having a top priority for quality assessment because of their high feasibility rating. These are: cardiac surgery; cataract surgery; tonsillectomy; appendectomy; tooth extraction; usage of albumin/ globulin products; treatments for hypertension, pneumonia, and acute upper respiratory infection; and services provided by clinical laboratory centers. Conclusion. The priority services identified from the studies will assist the HIRA in selecting target services and implementing the national assessment program.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16844376988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=16844376988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/intqhc/mzi018

DO - 10.1093/intqhc/mzi018

M3 - Article

C2 - 15723820

AN - SCOPUS:16844376988

VL - 17

SP - 157

EP - 165

JO - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

JF - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

SN - 1353-4505

IS - 2

ER -