Sex drugs and corporate ventriloquism: How to evaluate science policies intended to manage industry-funded bias

Bennett Holman, Sally Geislar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

“Female sexual dysfunction” is the type of contested disease that has sparked concern about the role of the pharmaceutical industry in medical science. Many policies have been proposed to manage industry influence without carefully evaluating whether the proposed policies would be successful. We consider a proposal for incorporating citizen stakeholders into scientific research and show, via a detailed case study of the pharmaceutical regulation of flibanserin (misleadingly marketed as the “female Viagra”), that such programs can be co-opted. In closing, we use Holman’s asymmetric arms race framework as a tool for evaluating policies in industry-funded science.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)869-881
Number of pages13
JournalPhilosophy of Science
Volume85
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Science Policy
Industry
Ventriloquism
Drugs
Pharmaceutical Industry
Stakeholders
Sexual
Pharmaceuticals
Medical Sciences

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History
  • Philosophy
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

@article{e761af6ea7a84ee3961d18639b8e07ab,
title = "Sex drugs and corporate ventriloquism: How to evaluate science policies intended to manage industry-funded bias",
abstract = "“Female sexual dysfunction” is the type of contested disease that has sparked concern about the role of the pharmaceutical industry in medical science. Many policies have been proposed to manage industry influence without carefully evaluating whether the proposed policies would be successful. We consider a proposal for incorporating citizen stakeholders into scientific research and show, via a detailed case study of the pharmaceutical regulation of flibanserin (misleadingly marketed as the “female Viagra”), that such programs can be co-opted. In closing, we use Holman’s asymmetric arms race framework as a tool for evaluating policies in industry-funded science.",
author = "Bennett Holman and Sally Geislar",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/699713",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
pages = "869--881",
journal = "Philosophy of Science",
issn = "0031-8248",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "5",

}

Sex drugs and corporate ventriloquism : How to evaluate science policies intended to manage industry-funded bias. / Holman, Bennett; Geislar, Sally.

In: Philosophy of Science, Vol. 85, No. 5, 01.12.2018, p. 869-881.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex drugs and corporate ventriloquism

T2 - How to evaluate science policies intended to manage industry-funded bias

AU - Holman, Bennett

AU - Geislar, Sally

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - “Female sexual dysfunction” is the type of contested disease that has sparked concern about the role of the pharmaceutical industry in medical science. Many policies have been proposed to manage industry influence without carefully evaluating whether the proposed policies would be successful. We consider a proposal for incorporating citizen stakeholders into scientific research and show, via a detailed case study of the pharmaceutical regulation of flibanserin (misleadingly marketed as the “female Viagra”), that such programs can be co-opted. In closing, we use Holman’s asymmetric arms race framework as a tool for evaluating policies in industry-funded science.

AB - “Female sexual dysfunction” is the type of contested disease that has sparked concern about the role of the pharmaceutical industry in medical science. Many policies have been proposed to manage industry influence without carefully evaluating whether the proposed policies would be successful. We consider a proposal for incorporating citizen stakeholders into scientific research and show, via a detailed case study of the pharmaceutical regulation of flibanserin (misleadingly marketed as the “female Viagra”), that such programs can be co-opted. In closing, we use Holman’s asymmetric arms race framework as a tool for evaluating policies in industry-funded science.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056054955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056054955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/699713

DO - 10.1086/699713

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85056054955

VL - 85

SP - 869

EP - 881

JO - Philosophy of Science

JF - Philosophy of Science

SN - 0031-8248

IS - 5

ER -