Sex drugs and corporate ventriloquism: How to evaluate science policies intended to manage industry-funded bias

Bennett Holman, Sally Geislar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

“Female sexual dysfunction” is the type of contested disease that has sparked concern about the role of the pharmaceutical industry in medical science. Many policies have been proposed to manage industry influence without carefully evaluating whether the proposed policies would be successful. We consider a proposal for incorporating citizen stakeholders into scientific research and show, via a detailed case study of the pharmaceutical regulation of flibanserin (misleadingly marketed as the “female Viagra”), that such programs can be co-opted. In closing, we use Holman’s asymmetric arms race framework as a tool for evaluating policies in industry-funded science.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)869-881
Number of pages13
JournalPhilosophy of Science
Volume85
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Dec 1

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History
  • Philosophy
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Sex drugs and corporate ventriloquism: How to evaluate science policies intended to manage industry-funded bias'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this