Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy performed by a single surgeon experienced in open gastrectomy

Review of initial experience

Jeong Ho Song, Yoon Young Choi, Ji Yeong An, Dong Wook Kim, WooJin Hyung, Sung Hoon Noh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is more complicated than laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, especially during a surgeon’s initial experience with the technique. In this study, we evaluated the short-term outcomes of and learning curve for LTG during the initial cases of a single surgeon compared with those of open total gastrectomy (OTG). Materials and Methods: Between 2009 and 2013, 134 OTG and 74 LTG procedures were performed by a single surgeon who was experienced with OTG but new to performing LTG. Clinical characteristics, operative parameters, and short-term postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. Results: Advanced gastric cancer and D2 lymph node dissection were more common in the OTG than LTG group. Although the operation time was significantly longer for LTG than for OTG (175.7±43.1 minutes vs. 217.5±63.4 minutes), LTG seems to be slightly superior or similar to OTG in terms of postoperative recovery measures. The operation time moving average of 15 cases in the LTG group decreased gradually, and the curve flattened at 54 cases. The postoperative complication rate was similar for the two groups (11.9% vs. 13.5%). No anastomotic or stump leaks occurred. Conclusions: Although LTG is technically difficult and operation time is longer for surgeons experienced in open surgery, it can be performed safely, even during a surgeon’s early experience with the technique. Considering the benefits of minimally invasive surgery, LTG is recommended for early gastric cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159-166
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Gastric Cancer
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Gastrectomy
Surgeons
Stomach Neoplasms
Learning Curve
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Lymph Node Excision

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Song, Jeong Ho ; Choi, Yoon Young ; An, Ji Yeong ; Kim, Dong Wook ; Hyung, WooJin ; Noh, Sung Hoon. / Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy performed by a single surgeon experienced in open gastrectomy : Review of initial experience. In: Journal of Gastric Cancer. 2015 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 159-166.
@article{e5ceebc998694b43ab923cfee111ba91,
title = "Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy performed by a single surgeon experienced in open gastrectomy: Review of initial experience",
abstract = "Purpose: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is more complicated than laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, especially during a surgeon’s initial experience with the technique. In this study, we evaluated the short-term outcomes of and learning curve for LTG during the initial cases of a single surgeon compared with those of open total gastrectomy (OTG). Materials and Methods: Between 2009 and 2013, 134 OTG and 74 LTG procedures were performed by a single surgeon who was experienced with OTG but new to performing LTG. Clinical characteristics, operative parameters, and short-term postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. Results: Advanced gastric cancer and D2 lymph node dissection were more common in the OTG than LTG group. Although the operation time was significantly longer for LTG than for OTG (175.7±43.1 minutes vs. 217.5±63.4 minutes), LTG seems to be slightly superior or similar to OTG in terms of postoperative recovery measures. The operation time moving average of 15 cases in the LTG group decreased gradually, and the curve flattened at 54 cases. The postoperative complication rate was similar for the two groups (11.9{\%} vs. 13.5{\%}). No anastomotic or stump leaks occurred. Conclusions: Although LTG is technically difficult and operation time is longer for surgeons experienced in open surgery, it can be performed safely, even during a surgeon’s early experience with the technique. Considering the benefits of minimally invasive surgery, LTG is recommended for early gastric cancer.",
author = "Song, {Jeong Ho} and Choi, {Yoon Young} and An, {Ji Yeong} and Kim, {Dong Wook} and WooJin Hyung and Noh, {Sung Hoon}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5230/jgc.2015.15.3.159",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "159--166",
journal = "Journal of Gastric Cancer",
issn = "2093-582X",
publisher = "Korean Gastric Cancer Association",
number = "3",

}

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy performed by a single surgeon experienced in open gastrectomy : Review of initial experience. / Song, Jeong Ho; Choi, Yoon Young; An, Ji Yeong; Kim, Dong Wook; Hyung, WooJin; Noh, Sung Hoon.

In: Journal of Gastric Cancer, Vol. 15, No. 3, 01.09.2015, p. 159-166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy performed by a single surgeon experienced in open gastrectomy

T2 - Review of initial experience

AU - Song, Jeong Ho

AU - Choi, Yoon Young

AU - An, Ji Yeong

AU - Kim, Dong Wook

AU - Hyung, WooJin

AU - Noh, Sung Hoon

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Purpose: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is more complicated than laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, especially during a surgeon’s initial experience with the technique. In this study, we evaluated the short-term outcomes of and learning curve for LTG during the initial cases of a single surgeon compared with those of open total gastrectomy (OTG). Materials and Methods: Between 2009 and 2013, 134 OTG and 74 LTG procedures were performed by a single surgeon who was experienced with OTG but new to performing LTG. Clinical characteristics, operative parameters, and short-term postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. Results: Advanced gastric cancer and D2 lymph node dissection were more common in the OTG than LTG group. Although the operation time was significantly longer for LTG than for OTG (175.7±43.1 minutes vs. 217.5±63.4 minutes), LTG seems to be slightly superior or similar to OTG in terms of postoperative recovery measures. The operation time moving average of 15 cases in the LTG group decreased gradually, and the curve flattened at 54 cases. The postoperative complication rate was similar for the two groups (11.9% vs. 13.5%). No anastomotic or stump leaks occurred. Conclusions: Although LTG is technically difficult and operation time is longer for surgeons experienced in open surgery, it can be performed safely, even during a surgeon’s early experience with the technique. Considering the benefits of minimally invasive surgery, LTG is recommended for early gastric cancer.

AB - Purpose: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is more complicated than laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, especially during a surgeon’s initial experience with the technique. In this study, we evaluated the short-term outcomes of and learning curve for LTG during the initial cases of a single surgeon compared with those of open total gastrectomy (OTG). Materials and Methods: Between 2009 and 2013, 134 OTG and 74 LTG procedures were performed by a single surgeon who was experienced with OTG but new to performing LTG. Clinical characteristics, operative parameters, and short-term postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. Results: Advanced gastric cancer and D2 lymph node dissection were more common in the OTG than LTG group. Although the operation time was significantly longer for LTG than for OTG (175.7±43.1 minutes vs. 217.5±63.4 minutes), LTG seems to be slightly superior or similar to OTG in terms of postoperative recovery measures. The operation time moving average of 15 cases in the LTG group decreased gradually, and the curve flattened at 54 cases. The postoperative complication rate was similar for the two groups (11.9% vs. 13.5%). No anastomotic or stump leaks occurred. Conclusions: Although LTG is technically difficult and operation time is longer for surgeons experienced in open surgery, it can be performed safely, even during a surgeon’s early experience with the technique. Considering the benefits of minimally invasive surgery, LTG is recommended for early gastric cancer.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942910728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942910728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5230/jgc.2015.15.3.159

DO - 10.5230/jgc.2015.15.3.159

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 159

EP - 166

JO - Journal of Gastric Cancer

JF - Journal of Gastric Cancer

SN - 2093-582X

IS - 3

ER -