Single-, few-, and multilayer graphene not exhibiting significant advantages over graphite microparticles in electroanalysis

Madeline Shuhua Goh, Martin Pumera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This report compares the electroanalytical performances of single- (G-SL), few- (G-FL), and multilayer graphene (G-ML), graphite microparticles, and edge-plane pyrolytic graphite electrodes in terms of sensitivity, linearity, and repeatability. We show that in the case of differential pulse voltammetric (DPV) detection of ascorbic acid, the sensitivity of a G-SL electrode is about 30% greater than that of G-ML and about 40% greater than graphite microparticles. However, in the case of DPV determination of uric acid, sensitivity is practically the same for all (G-SL, G-FL, and G-ML) and, importantly, the graphite microparticles do provide higher sensitivity than graphenes do for this analyte. Graphenes also do not provide a significant advantage in terms of repeatability. We pose the question of whether the efforts leading to the bulk method of producing single-layer graphene are justified for electroanalytical applications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8367-8370
Number of pages4
JournalAnalytical Chemistry
Volume82
Issue number19
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Oct 1

Fingerprint

Graphite
Multilayers
Graphite electrodes
Uric Acid
Ascorbic Acid
Electrodes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Analytical Chemistry

Cite this

@article{756867fdc68e4f0ebfe38dbec118e7f1,
title = "Single-, few-, and multilayer graphene not exhibiting significant advantages over graphite microparticles in electroanalysis",
abstract = "This report compares the electroanalytical performances of single- (G-SL), few- (G-FL), and multilayer graphene (G-ML), graphite microparticles, and edge-plane pyrolytic graphite electrodes in terms of sensitivity, linearity, and repeatability. We show that in the case of differential pulse voltammetric (DPV) detection of ascorbic acid, the sensitivity of a G-SL electrode is about 30{\%} greater than that of G-ML and about 40{\%} greater than graphite microparticles. However, in the case of DPV determination of uric acid, sensitivity is practically the same for all (G-SL, G-FL, and G-ML) and, importantly, the graphite microparticles do provide higher sensitivity than graphenes do for this analyte. Graphenes also do not provide a significant advantage in terms of repeatability. We pose the question of whether the efforts leading to the bulk method of producing single-layer graphene are justified for electroanalytical applications.",
author = "Goh, {Madeline Shuhua} and Martin Pumera",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1021/ac101996m",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "8367--8370",
journal = "Analytical Chemistry",
issn = "0003-2700",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "19",

}

Single-, few-, and multilayer graphene not exhibiting significant advantages over graphite microparticles in electroanalysis. / Goh, Madeline Shuhua; Pumera, Martin.

In: Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 82, No. 19, 01.10.2010, p. 8367-8370.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Single-, few-, and multilayer graphene not exhibiting significant advantages over graphite microparticles in electroanalysis

AU - Goh, Madeline Shuhua

AU - Pumera, Martin

PY - 2010/10/1

Y1 - 2010/10/1

N2 - This report compares the electroanalytical performances of single- (G-SL), few- (G-FL), and multilayer graphene (G-ML), graphite microparticles, and edge-plane pyrolytic graphite electrodes in terms of sensitivity, linearity, and repeatability. We show that in the case of differential pulse voltammetric (DPV) detection of ascorbic acid, the sensitivity of a G-SL electrode is about 30% greater than that of G-ML and about 40% greater than graphite microparticles. However, in the case of DPV determination of uric acid, sensitivity is practically the same for all (G-SL, G-FL, and G-ML) and, importantly, the graphite microparticles do provide higher sensitivity than graphenes do for this analyte. Graphenes also do not provide a significant advantage in terms of repeatability. We pose the question of whether the efforts leading to the bulk method of producing single-layer graphene are justified for electroanalytical applications.

AB - This report compares the electroanalytical performances of single- (G-SL), few- (G-FL), and multilayer graphene (G-ML), graphite microparticles, and edge-plane pyrolytic graphite electrodes in terms of sensitivity, linearity, and repeatability. We show that in the case of differential pulse voltammetric (DPV) detection of ascorbic acid, the sensitivity of a G-SL electrode is about 30% greater than that of G-ML and about 40% greater than graphite microparticles. However, in the case of DPV determination of uric acid, sensitivity is practically the same for all (G-SL, G-FL, and G-ML) and, importantly, the graphite microparticles do provide higher sensitivity than graphenes do for this analyte. Graphenes also do not provide a significant advantage in terms of repeatability. We pose the question of whether the efforts leading to the bulk method of producing single-layer graphene are justified for electroanalytical applications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957323456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957323456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/ac101996m

DO - 10.1021/ac101996m

M3 - Article

C2 - 20822162

AN - SCOPUS:77957323456

VL - 82

SP - 8367

EP - 8370

JO - Analytical Chemistry

JF - Analytical Chemistry

SN - 0003-2700

IS - 19

ER -