Social benefits of brand logos in presentation of self in cross and same gender influence contexts

Jieun Lee, Eunju Ko, Carol M. Megehee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research predicts that luxury versus non-luxury self-display enhances status and produces advantages in human social interactions. Across three experiments, findings support the following conclusions. First, luxury versus non-luxury brand logos associate positively with displayer wealth and status. Second, people wearing clothes with luxury brand logos receive preferential treatment over those not wearing luxury brand logos. Third, a person wearing a luxury brand logo while soliciting charitable donations receives larger contributions than a person not wearing a luxury brand logo. Fourth, cross-gender contexts are more effective than same-gender contexts for requester and target in influencing consumer donation behavior. Conclusion: luxury self-display may increase deference and compliance in presentations-of-self because conspicuous displays of luxury qualify as a costly signaling trait that elicits status-dependent favorable treatment in human social interactions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1341-1349
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Business Research
Volume68
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jun 1

Fingerprint

Social benefits
Logos
Luxury brands
Luxury
Social interaction
Wealth
Charitable donations
Experiment
Preferential treatment
Clothes
Donation behavior

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{2183f940efb540389e280a21f470864b,
title = "Social benefits of brand logos in presentation of self in cross and same gender influence contexts",
abstract = "This research predicts that luxury versus non-luxury self-display enhances status and produces advantages in human social interactions. Across three experiments, findings support the following conclusions. First, luxury versus non-luxury brand logos associate positively with displayer wealth and status. Second, people wearing clothes with luxury brand logos receive preferential treatment over those not wearing luxury brand logos. Third, a person wearing a luxury brand logo while soliciting charitable donations receives larger contributions than a person not wearing a luxury brand logo. Fourth, cross-gender contexts are more effective than same-gender contexts for requester and target in influencing consumer donation behavior. Conclusion: luxury self-display may increase deference and compliance in presentations-of-self because conspicuous displays of luxury qualify as a costly signaling trait that elicits status-dependent favorable treatment in human social interactions.",
author = "Jieun Lee and Eunju Ko and Megehee, {Carol M.}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.12.004",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "1341--1349",
journal = "Journal of Business Research",
issn = "0148-2963",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

Social benefits of brand logos in presentation of self in cross and same gender influence contexts. / Lee, Jieun; Ko, Eunju; Megehee, Carol M.

In: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 68, No. 6, 01.06.2015, p. 1341-1349.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social benefits of brand logos in presentation of self in cross and same gender influence contexts

AU - Lee, Jieun

AU - Ko, Eunju

AU - Megehee, Carol M.

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - This research predicts that luxury versus non-luxury self-display enhances status and produces advantages in human social interactions. Across three experiments, findings support the following conclusions. First, luxury versus non-luxury brand logos associate positively with displayer wealth and status. Second, people wearing clothes with luxury brand logos receive preferential treatment over those not wearing luxury brand logos. Third, a person wearing a luxury brand logo while soliciting charitable donations receives larger contributions than a person not wearing a luxury brand logo. Fourth, cross-gender contexts are more effective than same-gender contexts for requester and target in influencing consumer donation behavior. Conclusion: luxury self-display may increase deference and compliance in presentations-of-self because conspicuous displays of luxury qualify as a costly signaling trait that elicits status-dependent favorable treatment in human social interactions.

AB - This research predicts that luxury versus non-luxury self-display enhances status and produces advantages in human social interactions. Across three experiments, findings support the following conclusions. First, luxury versus non-luxury brand logos associate positively with displayer wealth and status. Second, people wearing clothes with luxury brand logos receive preferential treatment over those not wearing luxury brand logos. Third, a person wearing a luxury brand logo while soliciting charitable donations receives larger contributions than a person not wearing a luxury brand logo. Fourth, cross-gender contexts are more effective than same-gender contexts for requester and target in influencing consumer donation behavior. Conclusion: luxury self-display may increase deference and compliance in presentations-of-self because conspicuous displays of luxury qualify as a costly signaling trait that elicits status-dependent favorable treatment in human social interactions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926186587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926186587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.12.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84926186587

VL - 68

SP - 1341

EP - 1349

JO - Journal of Business Research

JF - Journal of Business Research

SN - 0148-2963

IS - 6

ER -