Social conflicts and policy-making in korea: Interpretation of policy failures through a public discourse perspective

Yeonseob Ha, Jaehyun Joo, Minah Kang, Tae Joon Lah, Jiho Jang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent times, public policy-making in Korea has increasingly led to serious social conflicts. Competing and conflicting interests become publicly exposed in various, usually angry, ways such as wild picketing and disruptive demonstrations. In any society, public policy-making is usually associated with social conflicts, but the level and magnitude of social conflicts and, as a result, disarray in the policy-making process in Korea, have been unprecedented. This article argues that the Korean government's inattention to public discourse and policy-making strategies is largely responsible for the difficulties it has experienced in recent years. Korean society still lacks an effective decision-making system that could allow effective communication between policy stakeholders and coordinate their legitimate demands. By utilizing a public discourse perspective, this article provides detailed analyses of policy-making difficulties in Korea and proposes alternative ways to reach a social consensus for conflict-ridden social issues. Points for practitioners This article analyzes three cases of policy-making difficulties the Korean government has recently experienced. The three cases are the Radio Waste Disposal Facility siting decision, the introduction of the National Education Information System, and the Korea-US FTA Agreement. The three cases show how the lack of coordinating processes and inattention to policy-making strategies, such as issue framing in the communicative stage, could make public policies adrift. Our analysis shows that, to cope with policy-making problems in Korea, it is necessary to develop institutional mechanisms to incorporate various social interests at the stage of coordinative discourse. Furthermore, Korea needs to develop a more elaborate stage of communicative discourse.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)649-664
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Review of Administrative Sciences
Volume75
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Dec 1

Fingerprint

social conflict
Korea
interpretation
discourse
public policy
communication policy
waste disposal
lack
social issue
Social Policy
radio
information system
stakeholder
decision making
education

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

@article{12ff5d2b5ee74e439d272500d4b433a6,
title = "Social conflicts and policy-making in korea: Interpretation of policy failures through a public discourse perspective",
abstract = "In recent times, public policy-making in Korea has increasingly led to serious social conflicts. Competing and conflicting interests become publicly exposed in various, usually angry, ways such as wild picketing and disruptive demonstrations. In any society, public policy-making is usually associated with social conflicts, but the level and magnitude of social conflicts and, as a result, disarray in the policy-making process in Korea, have been unprecedented. This article argues that the Korean government's inattention to public discourse and policy-making strategies is largely responsible for the difficulties it has experienced in recent years. Korean society still lacks an effective decision-making system that could allow effective communication between policy stakeholders and coordinate their legitimate demands. By utilizing a public discourse perspective, this article provides detailed analyses of policy-making difficulties in Korea and proposes alternative ways to reach a social consensus for conflict-ridden social issues. Points for practitioners This article analyzes three cases of policy-making difficulties the Korean government has recently experienced. The three cases are the Radio Waste Disposal Facility siting decision, the introduction of the National Education Information System, and the Korea-US FTA Agreement. The three cases show how the lack of coordinating processes and inattention to policy-making strategies, such as issue framing in the communicative stage, could make public policies adrift. Our analysis shows that, to cope with policy-making problems in Korea, it is necessary to develop institutional mechanisms to incorporate various social interests at the stage of coordinative discourse. Furthermore, Korea needs to develop a more elaborate stage of communicative discourse.",
author = "Yeonseob Ha and Jaehyun Joo and Minah Kang and Lah, {Tae Joon} and Jiho Jang",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0020852309351447",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "649--664",
journal = "International Review of Administrative Sciences",
issn = "0020-8523",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Social conflicts and policy-making in korea : Interpretation of policy failures through a public discourse perspective. / Ha, Yeonseob; Joo, Jaehyun; Kang, Minah; Lah, Tae Joon; Jang, Jiho.

In: International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 75, No. 4, 01.12.2009, p. 649-664.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social conflicts and policy-making in korea

T2 - Interpretation of policy failures through a public discourse perspective

AU - Ha, Yeonseob

AU - Joo, Jaehyun

AU - Kang, Minah

AU - Lah, Tae Joon

AU - Jang, Jiho

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - In recent times, public policy-making in Korea has increasingly led to serious social conflicts. Competing and conflicting interests become publicly exposed in various, usually angry, ways such as wild picketing and disruptive demonstrations. In any society, public policy-making is usually associated with social conflicts, but the level and magnitude of social conflicts and, as a result, disarray in the policy-making process in Korea, have been unprecedented. This article argues that the Korean government's inattention to public discourse and policy-making strategies is largely responsible for the difficulties it has experienced in recent years. Korean society still lacks an effective decision-making system that could allow effective communication between policy stakeholders and coordinate their legitimate demands. By utilizing a public discourse perspective, this article provides detailed analyses of policy-making difficulties in Korea and proposes alternative ways to reach a social consensus for conflict-ridden social issues. Points for practitioners This article analyzes three cases of policy-making difficulties the Korean government has recently experienced. The three cases are the Radio Waste Disposal Facility siting decision, the introduction of the National Education Information System, and the Korea-US FTA Agreement. The three cases show how the lack of coordinating processes and inattention to policy-making strategies, such as issue framing in the communicative stage, could make public policies adrift. Our analysis shows that, to cope with policy-making problems in Korea, it is necessary to develop institutional mechanisms to incorporate various social interests at the stage of coordinative discourse. Furthermore, Korea needs to develop a more elaborate stage of communicative discourse.

AB - In recent times, public policy-making in Korea has increasingly led to serious social conflicts. Competing and conflicting interests become publicly exposed in various, usually angry, ways such as wild picketing and disruptive demonstrations. In any society, public policy-making is usually associated with social conflicts, but the level and magnitude of social conflicts and, as a result, disarray in the policy-making process in Korea, have been unprecedented. This article argues that the Korean government's inattention to public discourse and policy-making strategies is largely responsible for the difficulties it has experienced in recent years. Korean society still lacks an effective decision-making system that could allow effective communication between policy stakeholders and coordinate their legitimate demands. By utilizing a public discourse perspective, this article provides detailed analyses of policy-making difficulties in Korea and proposes alternative ways to reach a social consensus for conflict-ridden social issues. Points for practitioners This article analyzes three cases of policy-making difficulties the Korean government has recently experienced. The three cases are the Radio Waste Disposal Facility siting decision, the introduction of the National Education Information System, and the Korea-US FTA Agreement. The three cases show how the lack of coordinating processes and inattention to policy-making strategies, such as issue framing in the communicative stage, could make public policies adrift. Our analysis shows that, to cope with policy-making problems in Korea, it is necessary to develop institutional mechanisms to incorporate various social interests at the stage of coordinative discourse. Furthermore, Korea needs to develop a more elaborate stage of communicative discourse.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949355591&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949355591&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0020852309351447

DO - 10.1177/0020852309351447

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77949355591

VL - 75

SP - 649

EP - 664

JO - International Review of Administrative Sciences

JF - International Review of Administrative Sciences

SN - 0020-8523

IS - 4

ER -