Social Contagion in Competitors Versus Cooperators

Su Hyoun Park, Lisa K. Son, Min-Shik Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The current study examined social contagion-or the spreading of memories from individual to individual-in two different social contexts: Competition and Cooperation. Participants were provided with words (Experiments 1A and 1B) or scenes (Experiment 2) to study. After study, participants were randomly divided: Half were given a competitive context, and the other half, a cooperative context. Then, in the paired recall phase, each participant took turns with a confederate partner in recalling the previously studied items. On a subsequent test, participants had to report the items that were recalled on the pair recall phase, in addition to who had recalled that item. The results showed that competitors, as compared with cooperators, were more likely to focus on other people's memories, and surprisingly, the same difference obtained for false memories. Essentially, people who are primed with a competitive context were more easily 'infected' by memories, true or false.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)305-313
Number of pages9
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 May 1

Fingerprint

Contagion
Experiment
Social Context
False Memory
Confederate

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Park, Su Hyoun ; Son, Lisa K. ; Kim, Min-Shik. / Social Contagion in Competitors Versus Cooperators. In: Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2016 ; Vol. 30, No. 3. pp. 305-313.
@article{bdfe891e35bb4abda245ffd4b0d49d50,
title = "Social Contagion in Competitors Versus Cooperators",
abstract = "The current study examined social contagion-or the spreading of memories from individual to individual-in two different social contexts: Competition and Cooperation. Participants were provided with words (Experiments 1A and 1B) or scenes (Experiment 2) to study. After study, participants were randomly divided: Half were given a competitive context, and the other half, a cooperative context. Then, in the paired recall phase, each participant took turns with a confederate partner in recalling the previously studied items. On a subsequent test, participants had to report the items that were recalled on the pair recall phase, in addition to who had recalled that item. The results showed that competitors, as compared with cooperators, were more likely to focus on other people's memories, and surprisingly, the same difference obtained for false memories. Essentially, people who are primed with a competitive context were more easily 'infected' by memories, true or false.",
author = "Park, {Su Hyoun} and Son, {Lisa K.} and Min-Shik Kim",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/acp.3197",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "305--313",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Social Contagion in Competitors Versus Cooperators. / Park, Su Hyoun; Son, Lisa K.; Kim, Min-Shik.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 3, 01.05.2016, p. 305-313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Contagion in Competitors Versus Cooperators

AU - Park, Su Hyoun

AU - Son, Lisa K.

AU - Kim, Min-Shik

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - The current study examined social contagion-or the spreading of memories from individual to individual-in two different social contexts: Competition and Cooperation. Participants were provided with words (Experiments 1A and 1B) or scenes (Experiment 2) to study. After study, participants were randomly divided: Half were given a competitive context, and the other half, a cooperative context. Then, in the paired recall phase, each participant took turns with a confederate partner in recalling the previously studied items. On a subsequent test, participants had to report the items that were recalled on the pair recall phase, in addition to who had recalled that item. The results showed that competitors, as compared with cooperators, were more likely to focus on other people's memories, and surprisingly, the same difference obtained for false memories. Essentially, people who are primed with a competitive context were more easily 'infected' by memories, true or false.

AB - The current study examined social contagion-or the spreading of memories from individual to individual-in two different social contexts: Competition and Cooperation. Participants were provided with words (Experiments 1A and 1B) or scenes (Experiment 2) to study. After study, participants were randomly divided: Half were given a competitive context, and the other half, a cooperative context. Then, in the paired recall phase, each participant took turns with a confederate partner in recalling the previously studied items. On a subsequent test, participants had to report the items that were recalled on the pair recall phase, in addition to who had recalled that item. The results showed that competitors, as compared with cooperators, were more likely to focus on other people's memories, and surprisingly, the same difference obtained for false memories. Essentially, people who are primed with a competitive context were more easily 'infected' by memories, true or false.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947749047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947749047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/acp.3197

DO - 10.1002/acp.3197

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84947749047

VL - 30

SP - 305

EP - 313

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

IS - 3

ER -