Strategic planning as a complex and enabling managerial tool

Richard J. Arend, Y. Lisa Zhao, Michael Song, Subin Im

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research summary: The role of the strategic planning process in the ongoing generation of innovative knowledge is vital to the survival and growth of a firm, especially when technologies and market conditions are rapidly changing. We analyze data from a survey of firms in high-technology industries to determine whether it is possible to break the commonly experienced trade-off between strategic planning's positive influence on firm profitability and its negative influence on firm innovation. We draw on Adler and Borys's (1996) conceptualization of bureaucratic process types to identify several firm characteristics that have the potential to affect whether employees perceive strategic planning as enabling to their creative endeavors. We find that contingent effects between strategic planning and the identified firm characteristics exist that can break the trade-off. Managerial summary: A tension exits in the literature about whether strategic planning hurts or helps innovative activity. Our analysis of data from 227 business units in high-technology industries indicates that strategic planning is a complex process that can be perceived by employees as enabling or coercive. Our results confirm that strategic planning negatively affects innovative activity but positively affects profitability for average firms. We find, however, controllable firm characteristics—risk-taking and knowledge-based reward systems—affect the trade-off. Given the higher levels of risk-taking and knowledge-based reward systems, firms can use strategic planning to achieve both high returns on investment and a high level of innovative activity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1741-1752
Number of pages12
JournalStrategic Management Journal
Volume38
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Aug

Fingerprint

Strategic planning
Trade-offs
Innovative activity
Firm characteristics
High technology industry
Employees
Knowledge-based
Profitability
Reward
Conceptualization
Firm profitability
Reward system
Return on investment
Exit
Market conditions
Planning process
Risk taking
Innovation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Arend, Richard J. ; Zhao, Y. Lisa ; Song, Michael ; Im, Subin. / Strategic planning as a complex and enabling managerial tool. In: Strategic Management Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 38, No. 8. pp. 1741-1752.
@article{f26c56edf0d9467583ca54d6d4798a1c,
title = "Strategic planning as a complex and enabling managerial tool",
abstract = "Research summary: The role of the strategic planning process in the ongoing generation of innovative knowledge is vital to the survival and growth of a firm, especially when technologies and market conditions are rapidly changing. We analyze data from a survey of firms in high-technology industries to determine whether it is possible to break the commonly experienced trade-off between strategic planning's positive influence on firm profitability and its negative influence on firm innovation. We draw on Adler and Borys's (1996) conceptualization of bureaucratic process types to identify several firm characteristics that have the potential to affect whether employees perceive strategic planning as enabling to their creative endeavors. We find that contingent effects between strategic planning and the identified firm characteristics exist that can break the trade-off. Managerial summary: A tension exits in the literature about whether strategic planning hurts or helps innovative activity. Our analysis of data from 227 business units in high-technology industries indicates that strategic planning is a complex process that can be perceived by employees as enabling or coercive. Our results confirm that strategic planning negatively affects innovative activity but positively affects profitability for average firms. We find, however, controllable firm characteristics—risk-taking and knowledge-based reward systems—affect the trade-off. Given the higher levels of risk-taking and knowledge-based reward systems, firms can use strategic planning to achieve both high returns on investment and a high level of innovative activity.",
author = "Arend, {Richard J.} and Zhao, {Y. Lisa} and Michael Song and Subin Im",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1002/smj.2420",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "1741--1752",
journal = "Strategic Management Journal",
issn = "0143-2095",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "8",

}

Strategic planning as a complex and enabling managerial tool. / Arend, Richard J.; Zhao, Y. Lisa; Song, Michael; Im, Subin.

In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 8, 08.2017, p. 1741-1752.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strategic planning as a complex and enabling managerial tool

AU - Arend, Richard J.

AU - Zhao, Y. Lisa

AU - Song, Michael

AU - Im, Subin

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - Research summary: The role of the strategic planning process in the ongoing generation of innovative knowledge is vital to the survival and growth of a firm, especially when technologies and market conditions are rapidly changing. We analyze data from a survey of firms in high-technology industries to determine whether it is possible to break the commonly experienced trade-off between strategic planning's positive influence on firm profitability and its negative influence on firm innovation. We draw on Adler and Borys's (1996) conceptualization of bureaucratic process types to identify several firm characteristics that have the potential to affect whether employees perceive strategic planning as enabling to their creative endeavors. We find that contingent effects between strategic planning and the identified firm characteristics exist that can break the trade-off. Managerial summary: A tension exits in the literature about whether strategic planning hurts or helps innovative activity. Our analysis of data from 227 business units in high-technology industries indicates that strategic planning is a complex process that can be perceived by employees as enabling or coercive. Our results confirm that strategic planning negatively affects innovative activity but positively affects profitability for average firms. We find, however, controllable firm characteristics—risk-taking and knowledge-based reward systems—affect the trade-off. Given the higher levels of risk-taking and knowledge-based reward systems, firms can use strategic planning to achieve both high returns on investment and a high level of innovative activity.

AB - Research summary: The role of the strategic planning process in the ongoing generation of innovative knowledge is vital to the survival and growth of a firm, especially when technologies and market conditions are rapidly changing. We analyze data from a survey of firms in high-technology industries to determine whether it is possible to break the commonly experienced trade-off between strategic planning's positive influence on firm profitability and its negative influence on firm innovation. We draw on Adler and Borys's (1996) conceptualization of bureaucratic process types to identify several firm characteristics that have the potential to affect whether employees perceive strategic planning as enabling to their creative endeavors. We find that contingent effects between strategic planning and the identified firm characteristics exist that can break the trade-off. Managerial summary: A tension exits in the literature about whether strategic planning hurts or helps innovative activity. Our analysis of data from 227 business units in high-technology industries indicates that strategic planning is a complex process that can be perceived by employees as enabling or coercive. Our results confirm that strategic planning negatively affects innovative activity but positively affects profitability for average firms. We find, however, controllable firm characteristics—risk-taking and knowledge-based reward systems—affect the trade-off. Given the higher levels of risk-taking and knowledge-based reward systems, firms can use strategic planning to achieve both high returns on investment and a high level of innovative activity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941671247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941671247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/smj.2420

DO - 10.1002/smj.2420

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84941671247

VL - 38

SP - 1741

EP - 1752

JO - Strategic Management Journal

JF - Strategic Management Journal

SN - 0143-2095

IS - 8

ER -