Structural and Behavioral Antecedents of Change

Status, Distinctiveness, and Relative Performance

Tohyun Kim, Mooweon Rhee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigates what determines social actors’ motivations and opportunities to risk changing their current courses of action and the extent to which they are likely to change, by integrating structural and behavioral perspectives on decision making. Behavioral perspectives argue that performance relative to aspirations determines the actors’ risk preference and motivation to change, while structural perspectives suggest that the actors’ choices and actions are enabled and constrained by the opportunities surrounding their structural positions to form exchange relations with the external audiences. We propose a theoretical model of how the actors’ status, distinctiveness, and relative performance interact to influence their motivations and opportunities to change, resulting in differential responsiveness to relative performance in terms of the degree of change. This model is empirically examined and supported in the context of the U.S. feature film industry between 1986 and 2006, where film directors decide the distances of change in the genre repertoires for their next film project. Overall, this study shows the importance of considering the interactions between the structural and behavioral antecedents to understand when and how social actors make decisions to change in an attempt to survive and prosper in dynamic environments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)716-741
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Management
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Relative performance
Distinctiveness
Aspiration
Responsiveness
Film industry
Interaction
Decision making
Dynamic environment
Structural change
Risk preferences

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Finance
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

@article{8f36fa7d16564efa9d1ad5000f527414,
title = "Structural and Behavioral Antecedents of Change: Status, Distinctiveness, and Relative Performance",
abstract = "This study investigates what determines social actors’ motivations and opportunities to risk changing their current courses of action and the extent to which they are likely to change, by integrating structural and behavioral perspectives on decision making. Behavioral perspectives argue that performance relative to aspirations determines the actors’ risk preference and motivation to change, while structural perspectives suggest that the actors’ choices and actions are enabled and constrained by the opportunities surrounding their structural positions to form exchange relations with the external audiences. We propose a theoretical model of how the actors’ status, distinctiveness, and relative performance interact to influence their motivations and opportunities to change, resulting in differential responsiveness to relative performance in terms of the degree of change. This model is empirically examined and supported in the context of the U.S. feature film industry between 1986 and 2006, where film directors decide the distances of change in the genre repertoires for their next film project. Overall, this study shows the importance of considering the interactions between the structural and behavioral antecedents to understand when and how social actors make decisions to change in an attempt to survive and prosper in dynamic environments.",
author = "Tohyun Kim and Mooweon Rhee",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0149206314541150",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "716--741",
journal = "Journal of Management",
issn = "0149-2063",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Structural and Behavioral Antecedents of Change : Status, Distinctiveness, and Relative Performance. / Kim, Tohyun; Rhee, Mooweon.

In: Journal of Management, Vol. 43, No. 3, 01.01.2014, p. 716-741.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structural and Behavioral Antecedents of Change

T2 - Status, Distinctiveness, and Relative Performance

AU - Kim, Tohyun

AU - Rhee, Mooweon

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - This study investigates what determines social actors’ motivations and opportunities to risk changing their current courses of action and the extent to which they are likely to change, by integrating structural and behavioral perspectives on decision making. Behavioral perspectives argue that performance relative to aspirations determines the actors’ risk preference and motivation to change, while structural perspectives suggest that the actors’ choices and actions are enabled and constrained by the opportunities surrounding their structural positions to form exchange relations with the external audiences. We propose a theoretical model of how the actors’ status, distinctiveness, and relative performance interact to influence their motivations and opportunities to change, resulting in differential responsiveness to relative performance in terms of the degree of change. This model is empirically examined and supported in the context of the U.S. feature film industry between 1986 and 2006, where film directors decide the distances of change in the genre repertoires for their next film project. Overall, this study shows the importance of considering the interactions between the structural and behavioral antecedents to understand when and how social actors make decisions to change in an attempt to survive and prosper in dynamic environments.

AB - This study investigates what determines social actors’ motivations and opportunities to risk changing their current courses of action and the extent to which they are likely to change, by integrating structural and behavioral perspectives on decision making. Behavioral perspectives argue that performance relative to aspirations determines the actors’ risk preference and motivation to change, while structural perspectives suggest that the actors’ choices and actions are enabled and constrained by the opportunities surrounding their structural positions to form exchange relations with the external audiences. We propose a theoretical model of how the actors’ status, distinctiveness, and relative performance interact to influence their motivations and opportunities to change, resulting in differential responsiveness to relative performance in terms of the degree of change. This model is empirically examined and supported in the context of the U.S. feature film industry between 1986 and 2006, where film directors decide the distances of change in the genre repertoires for their next film project. Overall, this study shows the importance of considering the interactions between the structural and behavioral antecedents to understand when and how social actors make decisions to change in an attempt to survive and prosper in dynamic environments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011554839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011554839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0149206314541150

DO - 10.1177/0149206314541150

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 716

EP - 741

JO - Journal of Management

JF - Journal of Management

SN - 0149-2063

IS - 3

ER -