Supplementary screening sonography in mammographically dense breast

Pros and cons

Ji Hyun Youk, Eunkyung Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sonography is an attractive supplement to mammography in breast cancer screening because it is relatively inexpensive, requires no contrast-medium injection, is well tolerated by patients, and is widely available for equipment as compared with MRI. Sonography has been especially valuable for women with mammographically dense breast because it has consistently been able to detect a substantial number of cancers at an early stage. Despite these findings, breast sonography has known limitations as a screening tool; operator-dependence, the shortage of skilled operators, the inability to detect microcalcifications, and substantially higher false-positive rates than mammography. Further study of screening sonography is still ongoing and is expected to help establish the role of screening sonography.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)588-593
Number of pages6
JournalKorean Journal of Radiology
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Ultrasonography
Breast
Mammography
Mammary Ultrasonography
Calcinosis
Early Detection of Cancer
Contrast Media
Breast Neoplasms
Equipment and Supplies
Injections
Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{30d93f3dd86e497f872ed06b429486eb,
title = "Supplementary screening sonography in mammographically dense breast: Pros and cons",
abstract = "Sonography is an attractive supplement to mammography in breast cancer screening because it is relatively inexpensive, requires no contrast-medium injection, is well tolerated by patients, and is widely available for equipment as compared with MRI. Sonography has been especially valuable for women with mammographically dense breast because it has consistently been able to detect a substantial number of cancers at an early stage. Despite these findings, breast sonography has known limitations as a screening tool; operator-dependence, the shortage of skilled operators, the inability to detect microcalcifications, and substantially higher false-positive rates than mammography. Further study of screening sonography is still ongoing and is expected to help establish the role of screening sonography.",
author = "Youk, {Ji Hyun} and Eunkyung Kim",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3348/kjr.2010.11.6.589",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "588--593",
journal = "Korean Journal of Radiology",
issn = "1229-6929",
publisher = "Korean Radiological Society",
number = "6",

}

Supplementary screening sonography in mammographically dense breast : Pros and cons. / Youk, Ji Hyun; Kim, Eunkyung.

In: Korean Journal of Radiology, Vol. 11, No. 6, 01.11.2010, p. 588-593.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supplementary screening sonography in mammographically dense breast

T2 - Pros and cons

AU - Youk, Ji Hyun

AU - Kim, Eunkyung

PY - 2010/11/1

Y1 - 2010/11/1

N2 - Sonography is an attractive supplement to mammography in breast cancer screening because it is relatively inexpensive, requires no contrast-medium injection, is well tolerated by patients, and is widely available for equipment as compared with MRI. Sonography has been especially valuable for women with mammographically dense breast because it has consistently been able to detect a substantial number of cancers at an early stage. Despite these findings, breast sonography has known limitations as a screening tool; operator-dependence, the shortage of skilled operators, the inability to detect microcalcifications, and substantially higher false-positive rates than mammography. Further study of screening sonography is still ongoing and is expected to help establish the role of screening sonography.

AB - Sonography is an attractive supplement to mammography in breast cancer screening because it is relatively inexpensive, requires no contrast-medium injection, is well tolerated by patients, and is widely available for equipment as compared with MRI. Sonography has been especially valuable for women with mammographically dense breast because it has consistently been able to detect a substantial number of cancers at an early stage. Despite these findings, breast sonography has known limitations as a screening tool; operator-dependence, the shortage of skilled operators, the inability to detect microcalcifications, and substantially higher false-positive rates than mammography. Further study of screening sonography is still ongoing and is expected to help establish the role of screening sonography.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78449282979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78449282979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3348/kjr.2010.11.6.589

DO - 10.3348/kjr.2010.11.6.589

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 588

EP - 593

JO - Korean Journal of Radiology

JF - Korean Journal of Radiology

SN - 1229-6929

IS - 6

ER -