Suspicious thyroid nodules 4 cm require a diagnostic lobectomy regardless of their benign fine needle aspiration results

Hyeung Kyoo Kim, Soo Young Kim, Yong Sang Lee, Euy Young Soh, Hang Seok Chang, Cheong Soo Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/objective: The diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) seems limited in large thyroid nodules with Bethesda Cat. 2 result. We aimed to determine the incidence of carcinoma with benign cytology and the reason for the high false-positive rate in thyroid nodules ≥4 cm. Methods: The records of 103 patients with thyroid nodules ≥4 cm with preoperative cytological diagnosis of Bethesda Cat. 2 who underwent thyroidectomy were consecutively reviewed. Characteristics between patients with malignant vs. benign pathology were compared. Results: Forty patients (38.8%) had malignancy. Malignancy was subclassified into follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (43%), minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma (20.0%), and minimally invasive Hurthle cell thyroid carcinoma (10.9%). Patients with malignant cytology had significantly more suspicious ultrasound findings than those with benign cytology (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Preoperative FNAB showed high false-negative rates in patients with thyroid nodules ≥4 cm with benign cytology. These nodules have a high malignancy rate with suspicious ultrasound findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1113-1116
Number of pages4
JournalAsian Journal of Surgery
Volume45
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022 May

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was supported by the Research grant for general professor from Yonsei University College of Medicine ( 6-2018-0170 ).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Suspicious thyroid nodules 4 cm require a diagnostic lobectomy regardless of their benign fine needle aspiration results'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this