The association of clinical outcome to first-line VEGF-targeted therapy with clinical outcome to second-line VEGF-targeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients

Mhd Y. Al-Marrawi, Brian I. Rini, Lauren C. Harshman, Georg Bjarnason, Lori Wood, Ulka Vaishampayan, Mary MacKenzie, Jennifer J. Knox, Neeraj Agarwal, Hulayel Al-Harbi, Christian Kollmannsberger, Min Han Tan, Sun Young Rha, Frede N. Donskov, Scott North, Toni K. Choueiri, Daniel Y. Heng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are many active drugs to treat metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients who progress through their first-line vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor. Many clinicians choose a second-line VEGF inhibitor based on the type of response to first-line VEGF inhibitor, without data supporting this practice. This study was conducted to determine the association of response to second-line VEGF inhibitor with response to first-line VEGF inhibitor. All mRCC patients in participating centers of the International mRCC Database Consortium who were treated from January 2004 through June 2011 with a second-line VEGF inhibitor after failure of a different first-line VEGF inhibitor were retrospectively identified. The primary outcome is objective response rate (ORR) and the secondary outcome is progression-free survival (PFS) in each line of therapy. Of 1,602 total database patients, 464 patients received a first- and second-line VEGF inhibitor. The ORR to first-line therapy was 22 %, and the ORR to second-line therapy was 11 %. The ORR to second-line therapy was not different among patients achieving partial response versus stable disease versus progressive disease to first-line therapy (14 % vs. 10 % vs. 11 %, respectively; chi-squared trend test p = 0.17). The median PFS on first-line VEGF-targeted therapy was 7.5 months (95 % CI, 6.6-8.1), and the median PFS on second-line VEGF inhibitor was 3.9 months (95 % CI, 3.6-4.5). There was no correlation between first-line and second-line PFS (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.025; p = 0.59). The clinical response to a second-line VEGF inhibitor is not dependent on response to the first-line VEGF-inhibitor. Further studies are needed to define clinical parameters that predict response to second-line therapy to optimize the sequence of VEGF-targeted therapy in metastatic RCC patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-209
Number of pages7
JournalTargeted Oncology
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Sep

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The association of clinical outcome to first-line VEGF-targeted therapy with clinical outcome to second-line VEGF-targeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this