The BDS campaign against israel: Lessons from South Africa

Joseph E. Yi, Joe Phillips

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel is animated by a pragmatic strain that views external sanctions as effective pressure against a small democratic state and by a moralistic Manichean strain that portrays Israelis as oppressors. Both strains hearken back to the earlier campaign against apartheid in South Africa. We argue that doing so misreads the lessons of South Africa. Sanctions may have contributed to ending apartheid, but they operated in conjunction with improved security and interpersonal trust among negotiators. Key contenders moved from a discourse of oppression to one that humanized one another as partners with legitimate concerns. These conditions are missing from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Both sides consider their security to be precarious and they are locked in competing narratives of victimization, which further erode mutual trust and security. Measures to improve the parties' security and trust would contribute to mutual concessions and greater justification for sanctions if the Israeli government is intransigent.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)306-310
Number of pages5
JournalPS - Political Science and Politics
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Apr 2

Fingerprint

boycott
sanction
Israel
campaign
apartheid
Israeli
Palestinian-Israeli conflict
concession
oppression
victimization
pragmatics
narrative
discourse

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{a1badc8a5e134e099f36b1ee035507d7,
title = "The BDS campaign against israel: Lessons from South Africa",
abstract = "The Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel is animated by a pragmatic strain that views external sanctions as effective pressure against a small democratic state and by a moralistic Manichean strain that portrays Israelis as oppressors. Both strains hearken back to the earlier campaign against apartheid in South Africa. We argue that doing so misreads the lessons of South Africa. Sanctions may have contributed to ending apartheid, but they operated in conjunction with improved security and interpersonal trust among negotiators. Key contenders moved from a discourse of oppression to one that humanized one another as partners with legitimate concerns. These conditions are missing from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Both sides consider their security to be precarious and they are locked in competing narratives of victimization, which further erode mutual trust and security. Measures to improve the parties' security and trust would contribute to mutual concessions and greater justification for sanctions if the Israeli government is intransigent.",
author = "Yi, {Joseph E.} and Joe Phillips",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1017/S1049096514002091",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "306--310",
journal = "PS - Political Science and Politics",
issn = "1049-0965",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

The BDS campaign against israel : Lessons from South Africa. / Yi, Joseph E.; Phillips, Joe.

In: PS - Political Science and Politics, Vol. 48, No. 2, 02.04.2015, p. 306-310.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The BDS campaign against israel

T2 - Lessons from South Africa

AU - Yi, Joseph E.

AU - Phillips, Joe

PY - 2015/4/2

Y1 - 2015/4/2

N2 - The Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel is animated by a pragmatic strain that views external sanctions as effective pressure against a small democratic state and by a moralistic Manichean strain that portrays Israelis as oppressors. Both strains hearken back to the earlier campaign against apartheid in South Africa. We argue that doing so misreads the lessons of South Africa. Sanctions may have contributed to ending apartheid, but they operated in conjunction with improved security and interpersonal trust among negotiators. Key contenders moved from a discourse of oppression to one that humanized one another as partners with legitimate concerns. These conditions are missing from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Both sides consider their security to be precarious and they are locked in competing narratives of victimization, which further erode mutual trust and security. Measures to improve the parties' security and trust would contribute to mutual concessions and greater justification for sanctions if the Israeli government is intransigent.

AB - The Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel is animated by a pragmatic strain that views external sanctions as effective pressure against a small democratic state and by a moralistic Manichean strain that portrays Israelis as oppressors. Both strains hearken back to the earlier campaign against apartheid in South Africa. We argue that doing so misreads the lessons of South Africa. Sanctions may have contributed to ending apartheid, but they operated in conjunction with improved security and interpersonal trust among negotiators. Key contenders moved from a discourse of oppression to one that humanized one another as partners with legitimate concerns. These conditions are missing from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Both sides consider their security to be precarious and they are locked in competing narratives of victimization, which further erode mutual trust and security. Measures to improve the parties' security and trust would contribute to mutual concessions and greater justification for sanctions if the Israeli government is intransigent.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926350156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926350156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1049096514002091

DO - 10.1017/S1049096514002091

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84926350156

VL - 48

SP - 306

EP - 310

JO - PS - Political Science and Politics

JF - PS - Political Science and Politics

SN - 1049-0965

IS - 2

ER -