The Burgeoning but Still Experimental Practice of Deliberative Governance in South Korean Local Policy Making: The Cases of Seoul and Gwangju

Tae In Park, Pan Suk Kim, David H. Rosenbloom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Research on deliberative governance does not include many case studies on South Korea. We analyze deliberative governance in the Seoul and Gwangju Metropolitan Governments, drawing comparisons and lessons for operating effective deliberative governance to promote consensus building, citizen empowerment, and legitimation of policy choices through collective decision making. The two cases incorporate the characteristics of deliberative governance to a limited degree and in an experimental stage. Based on a comparison of the two cases, we discuss the application and limitations of deliberative processes along with suggestions for potentially improving the practice of deliberative governance in the South Korean context.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)907-934
Number of pages28
JournalAdministration and Society
Volume49
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jul 1

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Burgeoning but Still Experimental Practice of Deliberative Governance in South Korean Local Policy Making: The Cases of Seoul and Gwangju'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this