The effect of ceramic surface treatments on the shear bond strength of dental composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials

W. H. Kim, H. J. Lee, K. W. Lee, K. M. Kim, K. N. Kim, J. S. Shim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of composite resin to 4 different all-ceramic coping materials with 3 different surface treatments after thermocycling and without thermocycling. Three different surface treatments - sandblasting with 50 μm alumina particles (AB); sandblasting with 50 μm alumina particles and acid etching with 4% hydrofluoric acid (AE); sandblasting with 50 μm alumina particles and 30 μm alumina particles with tribochemical silica coating (SI) and silane application - were used on four different all-ceramic; Feldspatic ceramic (Duceram Plus); Lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS Empress2); Alumica ceramic (In-Ceram Alumina); Zirconia ceramic (Zi-Ceram) - substrates. Shear bond strength of restorative composite resin to substrate was tested after thermocycling and without thermocycling (n=10). Each specimen was subjected to a shear load at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min until fracture. Two-way analysis of variance and Duncan multiple comparison test (a =0.05) were used to analyze the bond strength values. There were significant differences in the bond strengths for ceramic types (P<.001), surface treatments (P<.001), and thermocycling (P<.001). The Duncan analysis showed that the Si specimens had significantly higher bonding strengths than other specimens. The bond strength of composite resin decreased after thermocycling.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1365-1368
Number of pages4
JournalKey Engineering Materials
Volume330-332 II
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Jan 24

Fingerprint

Dental composites
Bond strength (materials)
Thermal cycling
Ceramic materials
Surface treatment
Resins
Aluminum Oxide
Alumina
Composite Resins
Composite materials
Hydrofluoric Acid
Silanes
Hydrofluoric acid
Substrates
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Silicon Dioxide
Zirconia
Composite Dental Resin
Etching
Lithium

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Materials Science(all)
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Kim, W. H. ; Lee, H. J. ; Lee, K. W. ; Kim, K. M. ; Kim, K. N. ; Shim, J. S. / The effect of ceramic surface treatments on the shear bond strength of dental composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials. In: Key Engineering Materials. 2007 ; Vol. 330-332 II. pp. 1365-1368.
@article{de1f996f7fbe4edf85462b9c4c85918b,
title = "The effect of ceramic surface treatments on the shear bond strength of dental composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of composite resin to 4 different all-ceramic coping materials with 3 different surface treatments after thermocycling and without thermocycling. Three different surface treatments - sandblasting with 50 μm alumina particles (AB); sandblasting with 50 μm alumina particles and acid etching with 4{\%} hydrofluoric acid (AE); sandblasting with 50 μm alumina particles and 30 μm alumina particles with tribochemical silica coating (SI) and silane application - were used on four different all-ceramic; Feldspatic ceramic (Duceram Plus); Lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS Empress2); Alumica ceramic (In-Ceram Alumina); Zirconia ceramic (Zi-Ceram) - substrates. Shear bond strength of restorative composite resin to substrate was tested after thermocycling and without thermocycling (n=10). Each specimen was subjected to a shear load at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min until fracture. Two-way analysis of variance and Duncan multiple comparison test (a =0.05) were used to analyze the bond strength values. There were significant differences in the bond strengths for ceramic types (P<.001), surface treatments (P<.001), and thermocycling (P<.001). The Duncan analysis showed that the Si specimens had significantly higher bonding strengths than other specimens. The bond strength of composite resin decreased after thermocycling.",
author = "Kim, {W. H.} and Lee, {H. J.} and Lee, {K. W.} and Kim, {K. M.} and Kim, {K. N.} and Shim, {J. S.}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "24",
language = "English",
volume = "330-332 II",
pages = "1365--1368",
journal = "Key Engineering Materials",
issn = "1013-9826",
publisher = "Trans Tech Publications",

}

The effect of ceramic surface treatments on the shear bond strength of dental composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials. / Kim, W. H.; Lee, H. J.; Lee, K. W.; Kim, K. M.; Kim, K. N.; Shim, J. S.

In: Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 330-332 II, 24.01.2007, p. 1365-1368.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of ceramic surface treatments on the shear bond strength of dental composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials

AU - Kim, W. H.

AU - Lee, H. J.

AU - Lee, K. W.

AU - Kim, K. M.

AU - Kim, K. N.

AU - Shim, J. S.

PY - 2007/1/24

Y1 - 2007/1/24

N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of composite resin to 4 different all-ceramic coping materials with 3 different surface treatments after thermocycling and without thermocycling. Three different surface treatments - sandblasting with 50 μm alumina particles (AB); sandblasting with 50 μm alumina particles and acid etching with 4% hydrofluoric acid (AE); sandblasting with 50 μm alumina particles and 30 μm alumina particles with tribochemical silica coating (SI) and silane application - were used on four different all-ceramic; Feldspatic ceramic (Duceram Plus); Lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS Empress2); Alumica ceramic (In-Ceram Alumina); Zirconia ceramic (Zi-Ceram) - substrates. Shear bond strength of restorative composite resin to substrate was tested after thermocycling and without thermocycling (n=10). Each specimen was subjected to a shear load at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min until fracture. Two-way analysis of variance and Duncan multiple comparison test (a =0.05) were used to analyze the bond strength values. There were significant differences in the bond strengths for ceramic types (P<.001), surface treatments (P<.001), and thermocycling (P<.001). The Duncan analysis showed that the Si specimens had significantly higher bonding strengths than other specimens. The bond strength of composite resin decreased after thermocycling.

AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of composite resin to 4 different all-ceramic coping materials with 3 different surface treatments after thermocycling and without thermocycling. Three different surface treatments - sandblasting with 50 μm alumina particles (AB); sandblasting with 50 μm alumina particles and acid etching with 4% hydrofluoric acid (AE); sandblasting with 50 μm alumina particles and 30 μm alumina particles with tribochemical silica coating (SI) and silane application - were used on four different all-ceramic; Feldspatic ceramic (Duceram Plus); Lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS Empress2); Alumica ceramic (In-Ceram Alumina); Zirconia ceramic (Zi-Ceram) - substrates. Shear bond strength of restorative composite resin to substrate was tested after thermocycling and without thermocycling (n=10). Each specimen was subjected to a shear load at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min until fracture. Two-way analysis of variance and Duncan multiple comparison test (a =0.05) were used to analyze the bond strength values. There were significant differences in the bond strengths for ceramic types (P<.001), surface treatments (P<.001), and thermocycling (P<.001). The Duncan analysis showed that the Si specimens had significantly higher bonding strengths than other specimens. The bond strength of composite resin decreased after thermocycling.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846276534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846276534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33846276534

VL - 330-332 II

SP - 1365

EP - 1368

JO - Key Engineering Materials

JF - Key Engineering Materials

SN - 1013-9826

ER -