The effect of later change or modulation of immunosuppression on long-term renal transplant results

J. J. Lee, M. S. Kim, Y. S. Kim, D. J. Joo, M. K. Ju, H. J. Kim, J. E. Lee, S. I. Kim, K. H. Huh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Proper maintenance of immunosuppression is required to achieve long-term graft survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of change or modulation of an immunosuppressive regimen (IR) on graft survival during the posttransplant period in patients undergoing kidney transplantation. A total of 1164 patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 1997 and December 2008 at Yonsei University Health System were enrolled. All patients initially received calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based double or triple IR (DIR and TIR, respectively). The causes of IR changes or modulation were reviewed retrospectively. Graft survival rate was compared according to types of maintenance immunosuppression (DIR versus TIR). Initially, DIR and TIR were adopted in 201 (17.3%) and 963 (82.7%) recipients, respectively. In 77 DIR recipients (38.8%) and 271 TIR recipients (28.1%), IRs were changed. Among recipients of an initial DIR, the most frequent reasons for IR change were acute rejection (50%) within 6 months of transplantation and chronic allograft dysfunction (70%) after 6 months. In TIR recipients, the reasons for IR change included drug toxicity or drug-related side effects (34.3%) within 6 months of transplantation and complications related to overimmunosuppression (39.3%) after 6 months. The group in which the IR was changed from the initial DIR to the later TIR had a statistically superior graft survival rate compared to the group that did not have a change in the initial DIR (P = .032). In contrast, TIR recipients without change had better graft survival rate than recipients with initial TIR change to later DIR (P < .001). Change or modulation of immunosuppression from initial DIR to later TIR could affect long-term graft survival.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4037-4039
Number of pages3
JournalTransplantation Proceedings
Volume42
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Graft Survival
Immunosuppressive Agents
Immunosuppression
Transplants
Kidney
Survival Rate
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
Kidney Transplantation
Transplantation
Maintenance
Allografts
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Transplantation

Cite this

Lee, J. J. ; Kim, M. S. ; Kim, Y. S. ; Joo, D. J. ; Ju, M. K. ; Kim, H. J. ; Lee, J. E. ; Kim, S. I. ; Huh, K. H. / The effect of later change or modulation of immunosuppression on long-term renal transplant results. In: Transplantation Proceedings. 2010 ; Vol. 42, No. 10. pp. 4037-4039.
@article{b68c592ebd054b0c88f765fd43a1fe2f,
title = "The effect of later change or modulation of immunosuppression on long-term renal transplant results",
abstract = "Proper maintenance of immunosuppression is required to achieve long-term graft survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of change or modulation of an immunosuppressive regimen (IR) on graft survival during the posttransplant period in patients undergoing kidney transplantation. A total of 1164 patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 1997 and December 2008 at Yonsei University Health System were enrolled. All patients initially received calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based double or triple IR (DIR and TIR, respectively). The causes of IR changes or modulation were reviewed retrospectively. Graft survival rate was compared according to types of maintenance immunosuppression (DIR versus TIR). Initially, DIR and TIR were adopted in 201 (17.3{\%}) and 963 (82.7{\%}) recipients, respectively. In 77 DIR recipients (38.8{\%}) and 271 TIR recipients (28.1{\%}), IRs were changed. Among recipients of an initial DIR, the most frequent reasons for IR change were acute rejection (50{\%}) within 6 months of transplantation and chronic allograft dysfunction (70{\%}) after 6 months. In TIR recipients, the reasons for IR change included drug toxicity or drug-related side effects (34.3{\%}) within 6 months of transplantation and complications related to overimmunosuppression (39.3{\%}) after 6 months. The group in which the IR was changed from the initial DIR to the later TIR had a statistically superior graft survival rate compared to the group that did not have a change in the initial DIR (P = .032). In contrast, TIR recipients without change had better graft survival rate than recipients with initial TIR change to later DIR (P < .001). Change or modulation of immunosuppression from initial DIR to later TIR could affect long-term graft survival.",
author = "Lee, {J. J.} and Kim, {M. S.} and Kim, {Y. S.} and Joo, {D. J.} and Ju, {M. K.} and Kim, {H. J.} and Lee, {J. E.} and Kim, {S. I.} and Huh, {K. H.}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.10.021",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "4037--4039",
journal = "Transplantation Proceedings",
issn = "0041-1345",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "10",

}

The effect of later change or modulation of immunosuppression on long-term renal transplant results. / Lee, J. J.; Kim, M. S.; Kim, Y. S.; Joo, D. J.; Ju, M. K.; Kim, H. J.; Lee, J. E.; Kim, S. I.; Huh, K. H.

In: Transplantation Proceedings, Vol. 42, No. 10, 01.12.2010, p. 4037-4039.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of later change or modulation of immunosuppression on long-term renal transplant results

AU - Lee, J. J.

AU - Kim, M. S.

AU - Kim, Y. S.

AU - Joo, D. J.

AU - Ju, M. K.

AU - Kim, H. J.

AU - Lee, J. E.

AU - Kim, S. I.

AU - Huh, K. H.

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - Proper maintenance of immunosuppression is required to achieve long-term graft survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of change or modulation of an immunosuppressive regimen (IR) on graft survival during the posttransplant period in patients undergoing kidney transplantation. A total of 1164 patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 1997 and December 2008 at Yonsei University Health System were enrolled. All patients initially received calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based double or triple IR (DIR and TIR, respectively). The causes of IR changes or modulation were reviewed retrospectively. Graft survival rate was compared according to types of maintenance immunosuppression (DIR versus TIR). Initially, DIR and TIR were adopted in 201 (17.3%) and 963 (82.7%) recipients, respectively. In 77 DIR recipients (38.8%) and 271 TIR recipients (28.1%), IRs were changed. Among recipients of an initial DIR, the most frequent reasons for IR change were acute rejection (50%) within 6 months of transplantation and chronic allograft dysfunction (70%) after 6 months. In TIR recipients, the reasons for IR change included drug toxicity or drug-related side effects (34.3%) within 6 months of transplantation and complications related to overimmunosuppression (39.3%) after 6 months. The group in which the IR was changed from the initial DIR to the later TIR had a statistically superior graft survival rate compared to the group that did not have a change in the initial DIR (P = .032). In contrast, TIR recipients without change had better graft survival rate than recipients with initial TIR change to later DIR (P < .001). Change or modulation of immunosuppression from initial DIR to later TIR could affect long-term graft survival.

AB - Proper maintenance of immunosuppression is required to achieve long-term graft survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of change or modulation of an immunosuppressive regimen (IR) on graft survival during the posttransplant period in patients undergoing kidney transplantation. A total of 1164 patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 1997 and December 2008 at Yonsei University Health System were enrolled. All patients initially received calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based double or triple IR (DIR and TIR, respectively). The causes of IR changes or modulation were reviewed retrospectively. Graft survival rate was compared according to types of maintenance immunosuppression (DIR versus TIR). Initially, DIR and TIR were adopted in 201 (17.3%) and 963 (82.7%) recipients, respectively. In 77 DIR recipients (38.8%) and 271 TIR recipients (28.1%), IRs were changed. Among recipients of an initial DIR, the most frequent reasons for IR change were acute rejection (50%) within 6 months of transplantation and chronic allograft dysfunction (70%) after 6 months. In TIR recipients, the reasons for IR change included drug toxicity or drug-related side effects (34.3%) within 6 months of transplantation and complications related to overimmunosuppression (39.3%) after 6 months. The group in which the IR was changed from the initial DIR to the later TIR had a statistically superior graft survival rate compared to the group that did not have a change in the initial DIR (P = .032). In contrast, TIR recipients without change had better graft survival rate than recipients with initial TIR change to later DIR (P < .001). Change or modulation of immunosuppression from initial DIR to later TIR could affect long-term graft survival.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650462526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650462526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.10.021

DO - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.10.021

M3 - Article

C2 - 21168620

AN - SCOPUS:78650462526

VL - 42

SP - 4037

EP - 4039

JO - Transplantation Proceedings

JF - Transplantation Proceedings

SN - 0041-1345

IS - 10

ER -