The effect of R&D, technology commercialization capabilities and innovation performance

Seo Kyun Kim, Bong Gyou Lee, Beom Soo Park, Kyoung Seok Oh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between R&D capabilities (learning, R&D and external networking), technology commercialization (manufacturing and marketing), and innovation performance (product competitiveness) among SMEs in IT-related businesses. The study focuses on 254 Korean IT SMEs that were either recipients of government R&D grants or their indirect beneficiaries during the two-year period between 2005 and 2007. The major findings of this study are as follows: First, unlike what has been suggested by previous studies, R&D intensity was not the only factor influencing the innovation performance of firms; learning and external networking also had a significant influence on innovation. The research implication of this finding is that the measurement of firms' performance should not be solely based on the intensity of R&D expenditures, but a broader set of factors including learning and external networking capabilities. Second, the technology commercialization capabilities of firms played the role of a mediator in the relationship between R&D and innovation performance. Within the innovation cycle of input (R&D capabilities), process (technology commercialization capabilities) and output (innovation performance), we found that R&D seldom influenced performance in a direct fashion, but its influence was most often mediated by technology commercialization capabilities. The practical implication of this finding for companies is that in order to improve performance, they must avoid narrowly focusing on R&D, but must invest also in capabilities to commercialize technologies resulting from R&D. Third, when direct and indirect beneficiaries of public R&D funding are compared together, the explanatory power of the relationship between R&D capabilities, technology commercialization capabilities and innovation performance was stronger among the latter than the former.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)563-578
Number of pages16
JournalTechnological and Economic Development of Economy
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Innovation performance
Technology commercialization
Networking
Small and medium-sized enterprises
Innovation
Manufacturing
R&D capability
Expenditure
Process technology
Competitiveness
Funding
Marketing performance
Firm performance
Mediator
Influencing factors
Factors
Government

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Finance

Cite this

@article{d8f3c5722a9c41c3ad84413d047a0d2a,
title = "The effect of R&D, technology commercialization capabilities and innovation performance",
abstract = "This paper investigates the relationship between R&D capabilities (learning, R&D and external networking), technology commercialization (manufacturing and marketing), and innovation performance (product competitiveness) among SMEs in IT-related businesses. The study focuses on 254 Korean IT SMEs that were either recipients of government R&D grants or their indirect beneficiaries during the two-year period between 2005 and 2007. The major findings of this study are as follows: First, unlike what has been suggested by previous studies, R&D intensity was not the only factor influencing the innovation performance of firms; learning and external networking also had a significant influence on innovation. The research implication of this finding is that the measurement of firms' performance should not be solely based on the intensity of R&D expenditures, but a broader set of factors including learning and external networking capabilities. Second, the technology commercialization capabilities of firms played the role of a mediator in the relationship between R&D and innovation performance. Within the innovation cycle of input (R&D capabilities), process (technology commercialization capabilities) and output (innovation performance), we found that R&D seldom influenced performance in a direct fashion, but its influence was most often mediated by technology commercialization capabilities. The practical implication of this finding for companies is that in order to improve performance, they must avoid narrowly focusing on R&D, but must invest also in capabilities to commercialize technologies resulting from R&D. Third, when direct and indirect beneficiaries of public R&D funding are compared together, the explanatory power of the relationship between R&D capabilities, technology commercialization capabilities and innovation performance was stronger among the latter than the former.",
author = "Kim, {Seo Kyun} and Lee, {Bong Gyou} and Park, {Beom Soo} and Oh, {Kyoung Seok}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3846/20294913.2011.603481",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "563--578",
journal = "Technological and Economic Development of Economy",
issn = "1392-8619",
publisher = "Vilnius Gediminas Technical University",
number = "4",

}

The effect of R&D, technology commercialization capabilities and innovation performance. / Kim, Seo Kyun; Lee, Bong Gyou; Park, Beom Soo; Oh, Kyoung Seok.

In: Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 17, No. 4, 01.01.2011, p. 563-578.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of R&D, technology commercialization capabilities and innovation performance

AU - Kim, Seo Kyun

AU - Lee, Bong Gyou

AU - Park, Beom Soo

AU - Oh, Kyoung Seok

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - This paper investigates the relationship between R&D capabilities (learning, R&D and external networking), technology commercialization (manufacturing and marketing), and innovation performance (product competitiveness) among SMEs in IT-related businesses. The study focuses on 254 Korean IT SMEs that were either recipients of government R&D grants or their indirect beneficiaries during the two-year period between 2005 and 2007. The major findings of this study are as follows: First, unlike what has been suggested by previous studies, R&D intensity was not the only factor influencing the innovation performance of firms; learning and external networking also had a significant influence on innovation. The research implication of this finding is that the measurement of firms' performance should not be solely based on the intensity of R&D expenditures, but a broader set of factors including learning and external networking capabilities. Second, the technology commercialization capabilities of firms played the role of a mediator in the relationship between R&D and innovation performance. Within the innovation cycle of input (R&D capabilities), process (technology commercialization capabilities) and output (innovation performance), we found that R&D seldom influenced performance in a direct fashion, but its influence was most often mediated by technology commercialization capabilities. The practical implication of this finding for companies is that in order to improve performance, they must avoid narrowly focusing on R&D, but must invest also in capabilities to commercialize technologies resulting from R&D. Third, when direct and indirect beneficiaries of public R&D funding are compared together, the explanatory power of the relationship between R&D capabilities, technology commercialization capabilities and innovation performance was stronger among the latter than the former.

AB - This paper investigates the relationship between R&D capabilities (learning, R&D and external networking), technology commercialization (manufacturing and marketing), and innovation performance (product competitiveness) among SMEs in IT-related businesses. The study focuses on 254 Korean IT SMEs that were either recipients of government R&D grants or their indirect beneficiaries during the two-year period between 2005 and 2007. The major findings of this study are as follows: First, unlike what has been suggested by previous studies, R&D intensity was not the only factor influencing the innovation performance of firms; learning and external networking also had a significant influence on innovation. The research implication of this finding is that the measurement of firms' performance should not be solely based on the intensity of R&D expenditures, but a broader set of factors including learning and external networking capabilities. Second, the technology commercialization capabilities of firms played the role of a mediator in the relationship between R&D and innovation performance. Within the innovation cycle of input (R&D capabilities), process (technology commercialization capabilities) and output (innovation performance), we found that R&D seldom influenced performance in a direct fashion, but its influence was most often mediated by technology commercialization capabilities. The practical implication of this finding for companies is that in order to improve performance, they must avoid narrowly focusing on R&D, but must invest also in capabilities to commercialize technologies resulting from R&D. Third, when direct and indirect beneficiaries of public R&D funding are compared together, the explanatory power of the relationship between R&D capabilities, technology commercialization capabilities and innovation performance was stronger among the latter than the former.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866336991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866336991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3846/20294913.2011.603481

DO - 10.3846/20294913.2011.603481

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 563

EP - 578

JO - Technological and Economic Development of Economy

JF - Technological and Economic Development of Economy

SN - 1392-8619

IS - 4

ER -