The effects of cash, electronic, and paper gift certificates as respondent incentives for a web-based survey of technologically sophisticated respondents

Jeremy P. Birnholtz, Daniel B. Horn, Thomas A. Finholt, Sung Joo Bae

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to determine the effectiveness of three invitation and incentive combinations in a web-based survey. A stratified convenience sample of 434 researchers who were target users of a collaboratory for earthquake engineering was randomly divided into three experimental conditions: (a) a $5 bill sent with the survey instructions via first class mail, (b) a $5 gift certificate code to Amazon.com sent with the survey instructions via first-class mail, or (c) a $5 gift certificate code to Amazon.com sent with the survey instructions via e-mail. Overall response was 43%. Results show that $5 bills led to significantly higher response rates than either gift certificate condition (57% for cash vs. 36% for the two gift certificate conditions, χ 2(1) = 93, p <.01). This suggests that cash is a superior incentive for an online survey, even with technologically sophisticated respondents. This may be due to the perceived limitations, delayed payoff, or reduced visibility of online gift certificates.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)355-362
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Science Computer Review
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004 Sep 1

Fingerprint

electronic cash
gift
certification
incentive
instruction
bill
e-mail
online survey
Visibility
natural disaster
Electronic money
engineering
experiment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Law

Cite this

@article{a8796f658b2e4bd6b9841102b00d2887,
title = "The effects of cash, electronic, and paper gift certificates as respondent incentives for a web-based survey of technologically sophisticated respondents",
abstract = "An experiment was conducted to determine the effectiveness of three invitation and incentive combinations in a web-based survey. A stratified convenience sample of 434 researchers who were target users of a collaboratory for earthquake engineering was randomly divided into three experimental conditions: (a) a $5 bill sent with the survey instructions via first class mail, (b) a $5 gift certificate code to Amazon.com sent with the survey instructions via first-class mail, or (c) a $5 gift certificate code to Amazon.com sent with the survey instructions via e-mail. Overall response was 43{\%}. Results show that $5 bills led to significantly higher response rates than either gift certificate condition (57{\%} for cash vs. 36{\%} for the two gift certificate conditions, χ 2(1) = 93, p <.01). This suggests that cash is a superior incentive for an online survey, even with technologically sophisticated respondents. This may be due to the perceived limitations, delayed payoff, or reduced visibility of online gift certificates.",
author = "Birnholtz, {Jeremy P.} and Horn, {Daniel B.} and Finholt, {Thomas A.} and Bae, {Sung Joo}",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0894439304263147",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "355--362",
journal = "Social Science Computer Review",
issn = "0894-4393",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

The effects of cash, electronic, and paper gift certificates as respondent incentives for a web-based survey of technologically sophisticated respondents. / Birnholtz, Jeremy P.; Horn, Daniel B.; Finholt, Thomas A.; Bae, Sung Joo.

In: Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 22, No. 3, 01.09.2004, p. 355-362.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of cash, electronic, and paper gift certificates as respondent incentives for a web-based survey of technologically sophisticated respondents

AU - Birnholtz, Jeremy P.

AU - Horn, Daniel B.

AU - Finholt, Thomas A.

AU - Bae, Sung Joo

PY - 2004/9/1

Y1 - 2004/9/1

N2 - An experiment was conducted to determine the effectiveness of three invitation and incentive combinations in a web-based survey. A stratified convenience sample of 434 researchers who were target users of a collaboratory for earthquake engineering was randomly divided into three experimental conditions: (a) a $5 bill sent with the survey instructions via first class mail, (b) a $5 gift certificate code to Amazon.com sent with the survey instructions via first-class mail, or (c) a $5 gift certificate code to Amazon.com sent with the survey instructions via e-mail. Overall response was 43%. Results show that $5 bills led to significantly higher response rates than either gift certificate condition (57% for cash vs. 36% for the two gift certificate conditions, χ 2(1) = 93, p <.01). This suggests that cash is a superior incentive for an online survey, even with technologically sophisticated respondents. This may be due to the perceived limitations, delayed payoff, or reduced visibility of online gift certificates.

AB - An experiment was conducted to determine the effectiveness of three invitation and incentive combinations in a web-based survey. A stratified convenience sample of 434 researchers who were target users of a collaboratory for earthquake engineering was randomly divided into three experimental conditions: (a) a $5 bill sent with the survey instructions via first class mail, (b) a $5 gift certificate code to Amazon.com sent with the survey instructions via first-class mail, or (c) a $5 gift certificate code to Amazon.com sent with the survey instructions via e-mail. Overall response was 43%. Results show that $5 bills led to significantly higher response rates than either gift certificate condition (57% for cash vs. 36% for the two gift certificate conditions, χ 2(1) = 93, p <.01). This suggests that cash is a superior incentive for an online survey, even with technologically sophisticated respondents. This may be due to the perceived limitations, delayed payoff, or reduced visibility of online gift certificates.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3242717116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3242717116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0894439304263147

DO - 10.1177/0894439304263147

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:3242717116

VL - 22

SP - 355

EP - 362

JO - Social Science Computer Review

JF - Social Science Computer Review

SN - 0894-4393

IS - 3

ER -