The effects of firm reputation and status on interorganizational network structure

David Chandler, Pamela R. Haunschild, Mooweon Rhee, Christine M. Beckman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we explore the differential effects of a firm's reputation and status on its interorganizational network. We hypothesize that due to its stable, unitary, and relational characteristics, status has a stronger influence on partner selection than reputation, which is less stable, multidimensional, and based more on perceptions of product quality and financial performance. Results from our analyses of the director networks of the 300 largest US firms from 1985 to 1993 confirm that across multiple measures of network characteristics, it is status that is the stronger predictor. In particular, high-status firms have networks that are higher in partner quality but are less diverse and contain fewer opportunities to bridge structural holes than the networks of high-reputation firms. These results contribute to our understanding of the different effects of reputation and status on firm behavior by emphasizing the importance of studying both together in order to understand the effects of either. They also contribute to work on interorganizational networks by demonstrating how structure emerges primarily as a function of focal firm status.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-244
Number of pages28
JournalStrategic Organization
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Aug 1

Fingerprint

reputation
firm
Firm reputation
Interorganizational networks
Network structure
director
performance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Education
  • Industrial relations
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Chandler, David ; Haunschild, Pamela R. ; Rhee, Mooweon ; Beckman, Christine M. / The effects of firm reputation and status on interorganizational network structure. In: Strategic Organization. 2013 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 217-244.
@article{35a024bd6ba5479b833848546866ef76,
title = "The effects of firm reputation and status on interorganizational network structure",
abstract = "In this article, we explore the differential effects of a firm's reputation and status on its interorganizational network. We hypothesize that due to its stable, unitary, and relational characteristics, status has a stronger influence on partner selection than reputation, which is less stable, multidimensional, and based more on perceptions of product quality and financial performance. Results from our analyses of the director networks of the 300 largest US firms from 1985 to 1993 confirm that across multiple measures of network characteristics, it is status that is the stronger predictor. In particular, high-status firms have networks that are higher in partner quality but are less diverse and contain fewer opportunities to bridge structural holes than the networks of high-reputation firms. These results contribute to our understanding of the different effects of reputation and status on firm behavior by emphasizing the importance of studying both together in order to understand the effects of either. They also contribute to work on interorganizational networks by demonstrating how structure emerges primarily as a function of focal firm status.",
author = "David Chandler and Haunschild, {Pamela R.} and Mooweon Rhee and Beckman, {Christine M.}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1476127013478693",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "217--244",
journal = "Strategic Organization",
issn = "1476-1270",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

The effects of firm reputation and status on interorganizational network structure. / Chandler, David; Haunschild, Pamela R.; Rhee, Mooweon; Beckman, Christine M.

In: Strategic Organization, Vol. 11, No. 3, 01.08.2013, p. 217-244.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of firm reputation and status on interorganizational network structure

AU - Chandler, David

AU - Haunschild, Pamela R.

AU - Rhee, Mooweon

AU - Beckman, Christine M.

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - In this article, we explore the differential effects of a firm's reputation and status on its interorganizational network. We hypothesize that due to its stable, unitary, and relational characteristics, status has a stronger influence on partner selection than reputation, which is less stable, multidimensional, and based more on perceptions of product quality and financial performance. Results from our analyses of the director networks of the 300 largest US firms from 1985 to 1993 confirm that across multiple measures of network characteristics, it is status that is the stronger predictor. In particular, high-status firms have networks that are higher in partner quality but are less diverse and contain fewer opportunities to bridge structural holes than the networks of high-reputation firms. These results contribute to our understanding of the different effects of reputation and status on firm behavior by emphasizing the importance of studying both together in order to understand the effects of either. They also contribute to work on interorganizational networks by demonstrating how structure emerges primarily as a function of focal firm status.

AB - In this article, we explore the differential effects of a firm's reputation and status on its interorganizational network. We hypothesize that due to its stable, unitary, and relational characteristics, status has a stronger influence on partner selection than reputation, which is less stable, multidimensional, and based more on perceptions of product quality and financial performance. Results from our analyses of the director networks of the 300 largest US firms from 1985 to 1993 confirm that across multiple measures of network characteristics, it is status that is the stronger predictor. In particular, high-status firms have networks that are higher in partner quality but are less diverse and contain fewer opportunities to bridge structural holes than the networks of high-reputation firms. These results contribute to our understanding of the different effects of reputation and status on firm behavior by emphasizing the importance of studying both together in order to understand the effects of either. They also contribute to work on interorganizational networks by demonstrating how structure emerges primarily as a function of focal firm status.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881250729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881250729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1476127013478693

DO - 10.1177/1476127013478693

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84881250729

VL - 11

SP - 217

EP - 244

JO - Strategic Organization

JF - Strategic Organization

SN - 1476-1270

IS - 3

ER -