The Effects of Shopping Well-Being and Shopping Ill-Being on Consumer Life Satisfaction

Ahmet Ekici, M. Joseph Sirgy, Dongjin Lee, Grace B. Yu, Michael Bosnjak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Individuals hold two distinct sets of beliefs about shopping activities: Positive beliefs regarding the degree to which shopping contributes to quality of life (shopping well-being), and negative beliefs related to the degree to which shopping activities result in overspending time, effort, and money (shopping ill-being). Shopping well-being and shopping ill-being are conceptualized as independent constructs in that shopping ill-being is not treated as negative polar of a single dimension. That is, one can experience both shopping well-being as well as shopping ill-being, simultaneously. We hypothesized that (1) shopping well-being is a positive predictor of life satisfaction, (2) shopping ill-being is a negative predictor of life satisfaction, and (3) shopping well-being does contribute to life satisfaction under conditions of low than high shopping ill-being. The study surveyed 1035 respondents in the UK. The study results supported hypotheses 1 and 3, not Hypothesis 2. The paper discusses the implications of these findings for retailers, macro-marketers, and policy makers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-353
Number of pages21
JournalApplied Research in Quality of Life
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jun 1

Fingerprint

well-being
quality of life
money
experience

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

Ekici, Ahmet ; Joseph Sirgy, M. ; Lee, Dongjin ; Yu, Grace B. ; Bosnjak, Michael. / The Effects of Shopping Well-Being and Shopping Ill-Being on Consumer Life Satisfaction. In: Applied Research in Quality of Life. 2018 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 333-353.
@article{e26bd3e64d5540b48fa5728abb65cc82,
title = "The Effects of Shopping Well-Being and Shopping Ill-Being on Consumer Life Satisfaction",
abstract = "Individuals hold two distinct sets of beliefs about shopping activities: Positive beliefs regarding the degree to which shopping contributes to quality of life (shopping well-being), and negative beliefs related to the degree to which shopping activities result in overspending time, effort, and money (shopping ill-being). Shopping well-being and shopping ill-being are conceptualized as independent constructs in that shopping ill-being is not treated as negative polar of a single dimension. That is, one can experience both shopping well-being as well as shopping ill-being, simultaneously. We hypothesized that (1) shopping well-being is a positive predictor of life satisfaction, (2) shopping ill-being is a negative predictor of life satisfaction, and (3) shopping well-being does contribute to life satisfaction under conditions of low than high shopping ill-being. The study surveyed 1035 respondents in the UK. The study results supported hypotheses 1 and 3, not Hypothesis 2. The paper discusses the implications of these findings for retailers, macro-marketers, and policy makers.",
author = "Ahmet Ekici and {Joseph Sirgy}, M. and Dongjin Lee and Yu, {Grace B.} and Michael Bosnjak",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11482-017-9524-9",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "333--353",
journal = "Applied Research in Quality of Life",
issn = "1871-2584",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

The Effects of Shopping Well-Being and Shopping Ill-Being on Consumer Life Satisfaction. / Ekici, Ahmet; Joseph Sirgy, M.; Lee, Dongjin; Yu, Grace B.; Bosnjak, Michael.

In: Applied Research in Quality of Life, Vol. 13, No. 2, 01.06.2018, p. 333-353.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effects of Shopping Well-Being and Shopping Ill-Being on Consumer Life Satisfaction

AU - Ekici, Ahmet

AU - Joseph Sirgy, M.

AU - Lee, Dongjin

AU - Yu, Grace B.

AU - Bosnjak, Michael

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Individuals hold two distinct sets of beliefs about shopping activities: Positive beliefs regarding the degree to which shopping contributes to quality of life (shopping well-being), and negative beliefs related to the degree to which shopping activities result in overspending time, effort, and money (shopping ill-being). Shopping well-being and shopping ill-being are conceptualized as independent constructs in that shopping ill-being is not treated as negative polar of a single dimension. That is, one can experience both shopping well-being as well as shopping ill-being, simultaneously. We hypothesized that (1) shopping well-being is a positive predictor of life satisfaction, (2) shopping ill-being is a negative predictor of life satisfaction, and (3) shopping well-being does contribute to life satisfaction under conditions of low than high shopping ill-being. The study surveyed 1035 respondents in the UK. The study results supported hypotheses 1 and 3, not Hypothesis 2. The paper discusses the implications of these findings for retailers, macro-marketers, and policy makers.

AB - Individuals hold two distinct sets of beliefs about shopping activities: Positive beliefs regarding the degree to which shopping contributes to quality of life (shopping well-being), and negative beliefs related to the degree to which shopping activities result in overspending time, effort, and money (shopping ill-being). Shopping well-being and shopping ill-being are conceptualized as independent constructs in that shopping ill-being is not treated as negative polar of a single dimension. That is, one can experience both shopping well-being as well as shopping ill-being, simultaneously. We hypothesized that (1) shopping well-being is a positive predictor of life satisfaction, (2) shopping ill-being is a negative predictor of life satisfaction, and (3) shopping well-being does contribute to life satisfaction under conditions of low than high shopping ill-being. The study surveyed 1035 respondents in the UK. The study results supported hypotheses 1 and 3, not Hypothesis 2. The paper discusses the implications of these findings for retailers, macro-marketers, and policy makers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015191525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015191525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11482-017-9524-9

DO - 10.1007/s11482-017-9524-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85015191525

VL - 13

SP - 333

EP - 353

JO - Applied Research in Quality of Life

JF - Applied Research in Quality of Life

SN - 1871-2584

IS - 2

ER -