The efficacy of BMP-2 preloaded on bone substitute or hydrogel for bone regeneration at peri-implant defects in dogs

Ui Won Jung, In Kyeong Lee, Jin Young Park, Daniel S. Thoma, Christoph H.F. Hämmerle, Ronald E. Jung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this experiment was to test whether or not a synthetic bone substitute (SBS) was more effective than a polyethylene glycol hydrogel as a carrier material for bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) when attempting to regenerate bone. Material and methods: Two identical, box-type dehiscence defects (4 × 4 mm buccolingually and apicocoronally, and 8 mm mesiodistally) were surgically prepared on buccal sides of the left and right edentulous ridge in five beagle dogs. Following implant placement, the defects either received (i) no graft, (ii) SBS+hydrogel, (iii) SBS+BMP-2 loaded hydrogel, and (iv) BMP-2-loaded SBS+hydrogel. The animals were euthanized at 8 weeks postsurgery. Radiographic and histomorphometric analyses were performed. Results: The hydrogel alone was not able to stabilize the grafted bone particles at 8 weeks, and SBS+hydrogel group did not significantly differ from the control group in all volumetric measurements. On the other hand, extensively regenerated new bone was connected with most of the remaining SBS particles in the BMP-2 groups. The BMP-2 groups exhibited significantly greater new bone formation (10.65 mm3 and 1.47 mm2 in the SBS+BMP-2-loaded hydrogel group; 14.17 mm3 and 0.93 mm2 in the BMP-2-loaded SBS+hydrogel) than non-BMP-2 groups (1.27 mm3 and 0.00 mm2 in the control group; 2.01 mm3 and 0.19 mm2 in the SBS+hydrogel group) in volumetric and histomorphometric analyses (P < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between both BMP-2 groups. Conclusion: BMP-2 could yield enhanced bone regeneration in the critical-size peri-implant defects regardless of whether SBS or hydrogel is used for preloading, although the outcomes seem to be more reproducible with BMP-2 preloaded on SBS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1456-1465
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Oral Implants Research
Volume26
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Bone Substitutes
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2
Bone Regeneration
Hydrogel
Dogs
Bone and Bones
Control Groups
Cheek
Osteogenesis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Jung, Ui Won ; Lee, In Kyeong ; Park, Jin Young ; Thoma, Daniel S. ; Hämmerle, Christoph H.F. ; Jung, Ronald E. / The efficacy of BMP-2 preloaded on bone substitute or hydrogel for bone regeneration at peri-implant defects in dogs. In: Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2015 ; Vol. 26, No. 12. pp. 1456-1465.
@article{b19ecce248134247ab16bf1561529842,
title = "The efficacy of BMP-2 preloaded on bone substitute or hydrogel for bone regeneration at peri-implant defects in dogs",
abstract = "The objective of this experiment was to test whether or not a synthetic bone substitute (SBS) was more effective than a polyethylene glycol hydrogel as a carrier material for bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) when attempting to regenerate bone. Material and methods: Two identical, box-type dehiscence defects (4 × 4 mm buccolingually and apicocoronally, and 8 mm mesiodistally) were surgically prepared on buccal sides of the left and right edentulous ridge in five beagle dogs. Following implant placement, the defects either received (i) no graft, (ii) SBS+hydrogel, (iii) SBS+BMP-2 loaded hydrogel, and (iv) BMP-2-loaded SBS+hydrogel. The animals were euthanized at 8 weeks postsurgery. Radiographic and histomorphometric analyses were performed. Results: The hydrogel alone was not able to stabilize the grafted bone particles at 8 weeks, and SBS+hydrogel group did not significantly differ from the control group in all volumetric measurements. On the other hand, extensively regenerated new bone was connected with most of the remaining SBS particles in the BMP-2 groups. The BMP-2 groups exhibited significantly greater new bone formation (10.65 mm3 and 1.47 mm2 in the SBS+BMP-2-loaded hydrogel group; 14.17 mm3 and 0.93 mm2 in the BMP-2-loaded SBS+hydrogel) than non-BMP-2 groups (1.27 mm3 and 0.00 mm2 in the control group; 2.01 mm3 and 0.19 mm2 in the SBS+hydrogel group) in volumetric and histomorphometric analyses (P < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between both BMP-2 groups. Conclusion: BMP-2 could yield enhanced bone regeneration in the critical-size peri-implant defects regardless of whether SBS or hydrogel is used for preloading, although the outcomes seem to be more reproducible with BMP-2 preloaded on SBS.",
author = "Jung, {Ui Won} and Lee, {In Kyeong} and Park, {Jin Young} and Thoma, {Daniel S.} and H{\"a}mmerle, {Christoph H.F.} and Jung, {Ronald E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/clr.12491",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "1456--1465",
journal = "Clinical Oral Implants Research",
issn = "0905-7161",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "12",

}

The efficacy of BMP-2 preloaded on bone substitute or hydrogel for bone regeneration at peri-implant defects in dogs. / Jung, Ui Won; Lee, In Kyeong; Park, Jin Young; Thoma, Daniel S.; Hämmerle, Christoph H.F.; Jung, Ronald E.

In: Clinical Oral Implants Research, Vol. 26, No. 12, 01.12.2015, p. 1456-1465.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The efficacy of BMP-2 preloaded on bone substitute or hydrogel for bone regeneration at peri-implant defects in dogs

AU - Jung, Ui Won

AU - Lee, In Kyeong

AU - Park, Jin Young

AU - Thoma, Daniel S.

AU - Hämmerle, Christoph H.F.

AU - Jung, Ronald E.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - The objective of this experiment was to test whether or not a synthetic bone substitute (SBS) was more effective than a polyethylene glycol hydrogel as a carrier material for bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) when attempting to regenerate bone. Material and methods: Two identical, box-type dehiscence defects (4 × 4 mm buccolingually and apicocoronally, and 8 mm mesiodistally) were surgically prepared on buccal sides of the left and right edentulous ridge in five beagle dogs. Following implant placement, the defects either received (i) no graft, (ii) SBS+hydrogel, (iii) SBS+BMP-2 loaded hydrogel, and (iv) BMP-2-loaded SBS+hydrogel. The animals were euthanized at 8 weeks postsurgery. Radiographic and histomorphometric analyses were performed. Results: The hydrogel alone was not able to stabilize the grafted bone particles at 8 weeks, and SBS+hydrogel group did not significantly differ from the control group in all volumetric measurements. On the other hand, extensively regenerated new bone was connected with most of the remaining SBS particles in the BMP-2 groups. The BMP-2 groups exhibited significantly greater new bone formation (10.65 mm3 and 1.47 mm2 in the SBS+BMP-2-loaded hydrogel group; 14.17 mm3 and 0.93 mm2 in the BMP-2-loaded SBS+hydrogel) than non-BMP-2 groups (1.27 mm3 and 0.00 mm2 in the control group; 2.01 mm3 and 0.19 mm2 in the SBS+hydrogel group) in volumetric and histomorphometric analyses (P < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between both BMP-2 groups. Conclusion: BMP-2 could yield enhanced bone regeneration in the critical-size peri-implant defects regardless of whether SBS or hydrogel is used for preloading, although the outcomes seem to be more reproducible with BMP-2 preloaded on SBS.

AB - The objective of this experiment was to test whether or not a synthetic bone substitute (SBS) was more effective than a polyethylene glycol hydrogel as a carrier material for bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) when attempting to regenerate bone. Material and methods: Two identical, box-type dehiscence defects (4 × 4 mm buccolingually and apicocoronally, and 8 mm mesiodistally) were surgically prepared on buccal sides of the left and right edentulous ridge in five beagle dogs. Following implant placement, the defects either received (i) no graft, (ii) SBS+hydrogel, (iii) SBS+BMP-2 loaded hydrogel, and (iv) BMP-2-loaded SBS+hydrogel. The animals were euthanized at 8 weeks postsurgery. Radiographic and histomorphometric analyses were performed. Results: The hydrogel alone was not able to stabilize the grafted bone particles at 8 weeks, and SBS+hydrogel group did not significantly differ from the control group in all volumetric measurements. On the other hand, extensively regenerated new bone was connected with most of the remaining SBS particles in the BMP-2 groups. The BMP-2 groups exhibited significantly greater new bone formation (10.65 mm3 and 1.47 mm2 in the SBS+BMP-2-loaded hydrogel group; 14.17 mm3 and 0.93 mm2 in the BMP-2-loaded SBS+hydrogel) than non-BMP-2 groups (1.27 mm3 and 0.00 mm2 in the control group; 2.01 mm3 and 0.19 mm2 in the SBS+hydrogel group) in volumetric and histomorphometric analyses (P < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between both BMP-2 groups. Conclusion: BMP-2 could yield enhanced bone regeneration in the critical-size peri-implant defects regardless of whether SBS or hydrogel is used for preloading, although the outcomes seem to be more reproducible with BMP-2 preloaded on SBS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945954245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945954245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/clr.12491

DO - 10.1111/clr.12491

M3 - Article

C2 - 25263966

AN - SCOPUS:84945954245

VL - 26

SP - 1456

EP - 1465

JO - Clinical Oral Implants Research

JF - Clinical Oral Implants Research

SN - 0905-7161

IS - 12

ER -