The empirical status of social work dissertation research

Characteristics, trends and implications for the field

Brandy R. Maynard, Michael George Vaughn, Christine M. Sarteschi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The quality and composition of a profession's body of knowledge bear significantly on the status, credibility and praxis of a profession. To assess the social work profession's capacity to build and advance knowledge, the present study examined characteristics and trends of social work doctoral dissertation research. A random sample of 593 social work dissertation abstracts from dissertations published in ProQuest Dissertations and Abstracts between 1998 and 2008 from US member schools of the Group for the Advancement of Doctoral Education (GADE) comprised the sample for this study. Data related to study design, methods, data sources, practice domains, participants, topics and international focus were extracted and analysed. The broad variety of research topics and participants chosen by doctoral candidates to study reflect traditional social work focal concerns. Observational research designs were used in the vast majority of dissertations, with only 7 per cent of doctoral candidates employing an experimental design. Quantitative analysis was utilised more than twice as frequently as qualitative methods. An upward trend in the use of secondary data was observed across the ten-year time frame. The findings of this study provide interesting and important insights into the characteristics and trends of doctoral education and research and have significant implications for doctoral training and social work research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)267-289
Number of pages23
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jan 1

Fingerprint

earning a doctorate
Social Work
social work
trend
Research
profession
Research Design
candidacy
Education
Information Storage and Retrieval
work research
qualitative method
random sample
credibility
research planning
education
school
knowledge
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{c5e693026b1a4fb58c4941f54fab01f3,
title = "The empirical status of social work dissertation research: Characteristics, trends and implications for the field",
abstract = "The quality and composition of a profession's body of knowledge bear significantly on the status, credibility and praxis of a profession. To assess the social work profession's capacity to build and advance knowledge, the present study examined characteristics and trends of social work doctoral dissertation research. A random sample of 593 social work dissertation abstracts from dissertations published in ProQuest Dissertations and Abstracts between 1998 and 2008 from US member schools of the Group for the Advancement of Doctoral Education (GADE) comprised the sample for this study. Data related to study design, methods, data sources, practice domains, participants, topics and international focus were extracted and analysed. The broad variety of research topics and participants chosen by doctoral candidates to study reflect traditional social work focal concerns. Observational research designs were used in the vast majority of dissertations, with only 7 per cent of doctoral candidates employing an experimental design. Quantitative analysis was utilised more than twice as frequently as qualitative methods. An upward trend in the use of secondary data was observed across the ten-year time frame. The findings of this study provide interesting and important insights into the characteristics and trends of doctoral education and research and have significant implications for doctoral training and social work research.",
author = "Maynard, {Brandy R.} and Vaughn, {Michael George} and Sarteschi, {Christine M.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/bjsw/bcs123",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "267--289",
journal = "British Journal of Social Work",
issn = "0045-3102",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

The empirical status of social work dissertation research : Characteristics, trends and implications for the field. / Maynard, Brandy R.; Vaughn, Michael George; Sarteschi, Christine M.

In: British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 44, No. 2, 01.01.2014, p. 267-289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The empirical status of social work dissertation research

T2 - Characteristics, trends and implications for the field

AU - Maynard, Brandy R.

AU - Vaughn, Michael George

AU - Sarteschi, Christine M.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - The quality and composition of a profession's body of knowledge bear significantly on the status, credibility and praxis of a profession. To assess the social work profession's capacity to build and advance knowledge, the present study examined characteristics and trends of social work doctoral dissertation research. A random sample of 593 social work dissertation abstracts from dissertations published in ProQuest Dissertations and Abstracts between 1998 and 2008 from US member schools of the Group for the Advancement of Doctoral Education (GADE) comprised the sample for this study. Data related to study design, methods, data sources, practice domains, participants, topics and international focus were extracted and analysed. The broad variety of research topics and participants chosen by doctoral candidates to study reflect traditional social work focal concerns. Observational research designs were used in the vast majority of dissertations, with only 7 per cent of doctoral candidates employing an experimental design. Quantitative analysis was utilised more than twice as frequently as qualitative methods. An upward trend in the use of secondary data was observed across the ten-year time frame. The findings of this study provide interesting and important insights into the characteristics and trends of doctoral education and research and have significant implications for doctoral training and social work research.

AB - The quality and composition of a profession's body of knowledge bear significantly on the status, credibility and praxis of a profession. To assess the social work profession's capacity to build and advance knowledge, the present study examined characteristics and trends of social work doctoral dissertation research. A random sample of 593 social work dissertation abstracts from dissertations published in ProQuest Dissertations and Abstracts between 1998 and 2008 from US member schools of the Group for the Advancement of Doctoral Education (GADE) comprised the sample for this study. Data related to study design, methods, data sources, practice domains, participants, topics and international focus were extracted and analysed. The broad variety of research topics and participants chosen by doctoral candidates to study reflect traditional social work focal concerns. Observational research designs were used in the vast majority of dissertations, with only 7 per cent of doctoral candidates employing an experimental design. Quantitative analysis was utilised more than twice as frequently as qualitative methods. An upward trend in the use of secondary data was observed across the ten-year time frame. The findings of this study provide interesting and important insights into the characteristics and trends of doctoral education and research and have significant implications for doctoral training and social work research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896929840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896929840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/bjsw/bcs123

DO - 10.1093/bjsw/bcs123

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 267

EP - 289

JO - British Journal of Social Work

JF - British Journal of Social Work

SN - 0045-3102

IS - 2

ER -