The first experiences of robotic single-site cholecystectomy in Asia

A potential way to expand minimally-invasive single-site surgery?

Sung Hwan Lee, Myung Jae Jung, Ho Kyoung Hwang, ChangMoo Kang, Woo Jung Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Herein, we firstly present the robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC) as performed in Asia and evaluate whether it could overcome the limitations of conventional laparoscopic single-site cholecystectomy. Materials and Methods: From October 2013 to November 2013, RSSC for benign gallbladder (GB) disease was firstly performed consecutively in five patients. We evaluated these early experiences of RSSC and compared factors including clinicopathologic factors and operative outcomes with our initial cases of single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SFLC). Results: Four female patients and one male patient underwent RSSC. Neither open conversion nor bile duct injury or bile spillage was noted during surgery. In comparisons with SFLC, patient-related factors in terms of age, sex, Body Mass Index, diagnosis, and American Society of Anesthesiologist score showed no significant differences between two groups. There were no significant differences in the operative outcomes regarding intraoperative blood loss, bile spillage during operation, postoperative pain scale values, postoperative complications, and hospital stay between the two groups (p0.05). Actual dissection time (p=0.003) and total operation time (p=0.001) were significantly longer in RSSC than in SFLC. There were no drain insertion or open conversion cases in either group. Conclusion: RSSC provides a comfortable environment and improved ergonomics to laparoscopic single-site cholecystectomy; however, this technique needs to be modified to allow for more effective intracorporeal movement. As experience and technical innovations continue, RSSC will soon be alternative procedure for well-selected benign GB disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189-195
Number of pages7
JournalYonsei medical journal
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Robotics
Cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Gallbladder Diseases
Bile
Human Engineering
Postoperative Pain
Bile Ducts
Dissection
Length of Stay
Body Mass Index
Wounds and Injuries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{ee90b897cb464c22b7513c5ff994e21e,
title = "The first experiences of robotic single-site cholecystectomy in Asia: A potential way to expand minimally-invasive single-site surgery?",
abstract = "Purpose: Herein, we firstly present the robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC) as performed in Asia and evaluate whether it could overcome the limitations of conventional laparoscopic single-site cholecystectomy. Materials and Methods: From October 2013 to November 2013, RSSC for benign gallbladder (GB) disease was firstly performed consecutively in five patients. We evaluated these early experiences of RSSC and compared factors including clinicopathologic factors and operative outcomes with our initial cases of single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SFLC). Results: Four female patients and one male patient underwent RSSC. Neither open conversion nor bile duct injury or bile spillage was noted during surgery. In comparisons with SFLC, patient-related factors in terms of age, sex, Body Mass Index, diagnosis, and American Society of Anesthesiologist score showed no significant differences between two groups. There were no significant differences in the operative outcomes regarding intraoperative blood loss, bile spillage during operation, postoperative pain scale values, postoperative complications, and hospital stay between the two groups (p0.05). Actual dissection time (p=0.003) and total operation time (p=0.001) were significantly longer in RSSC than in SFLC. There were no drain insertion or open conversion cases in either group. Conclusion: RSSC provides a comfortable environment and improved ergonomics to laparoscopic single-site cholecystectomy; however, this technique needs to be modified to allow for more effective intracorporeal movement. As experience and technical innovations continue, RSSC will soon be alternative procedure for well-selected benign GB disease.",
author = "Lee, {Sung Hwan} and Jung, {Myung Jae} and Hwang, {Ho Kyoung} and ChangMoo Kang and Lee, {Woo Jung}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3349/ymj.2015.56.1.189",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "189--195",
journal = "Yonsei Medical Journal",
issn = "0513-5796",
publisher = "Yonsei University College of Medicine",
number = "1",

}

The first experiences of robotic single-site cholecystectomy in Asia : A potential way to expand minimally-invasive single-site surgery? / Lee, Sung Hwan; Jung, Myung Jae; Hwang, Ho Kyoung; Kang, ChangMoo; Lee, Woo Jung.

In: Yonsei medical journal, Vol. 56, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 189-195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The first experiences of robotic single-site cholecystectomy in Asia

T2 - A potential way to expand minimally-invasive single-site surgery?

AU - Lee, Sung Hwan

AU - Jung, Myung Jae

AU - Hwang, Ho Kyoung

AU - Kang, ChangMoo

AU - Lee, Woo Jung

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Herein, we firstly present the robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC) as performed in Asia and evaluate whether it could overcome the limitations of conventional laparoscopic single-site cholecystectomy. Materials and Methods: From October 2013 to November 2013, RSSC for benign gallbladder (GB) disease was firstly performed consecutively in five patients. We evaluated these early experiences of RSSC and compared factors including clinicopathologic factors and operative outcomes with our initial cases of single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SFLC). Results: Four female patients and one male patient underwent RSSC. Neither open conversion nor bile duct injury or bile spillage was noted during surgery. In comparisons with SFLC, patient-related factors in terms of age, sex, Body Mass Index, diagnosis, and American Society of Anesthesiologist score showed no significant differences between two groups. There were no significant differences in the operative outcomes regarding intraoperative blood loss, bile spillage during operation, postoperative pain scale values, postoperative complications, and hospital stay between the two groups (p0.05). Actual dissection time (p=0.003) and total operation time (p=0.001) were significantly longer in RSSC than in SFLC. There were no drain insertion or open conversion cases in either group. Conclusion: RSSC provides a comfortable environment and improved ergonomics to laparoscopic single-site cholecystectomy; however, this technique needs to be modified to allow for more effective intracorporeal movement. As experience and technical innovations continue, RSSC will soon be alternative procedure for well-selected benign GB disease.

AB - Purpose: Herein, we firstly present the robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC) as performed in Asia and evaluate whether it could overcome the limitations of conventional laparoscopic single-site cholecystectomy. Materials and Methods: From October 2013 to November 2013, RSSC for benign gallbladder (GB) disease was firstly performed consecutively in five patients. We evaluated these early experiences of RSSC and compared factors including clinicopathologic factors and operative outcomes with our initial cases of single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SFLC). Results: Four female patients and one male patient underwent RSSC. Neither open conversion nor bile duct injury or bile spillage was noted during surgery. In comparisons with SFLC, patient-related factors in terms of age, sex, Body Mass Index, diagnosis, and American Society of Anesthesiologist score showed no significant differences between two groups. There were no significant differences in the operative outcomes regarding intraoperative blood loss, bile spillage during operation, postoperative pain scale values, postoperative complications, and hospital stay between the two groups (p0.05). Actual dissection time (p=0.003) and total operation time (p=0.001) were significantly longer in RSSC than in SFLC. There were no drain insertion or open conversion cases in either group. Conclusion: RSSC provides a comfortable environment and improved ergonomics to laparoscopic single-site cholecystectomy; however, this technique needs to be modified to allow for more effective intracorporeal movement. As experience and technical innovations continue, RSSC will soon be alternative procedure for well-selected benign GB disease.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84918838339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84918838339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.1.189

DO - 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.1.189

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 189

EP - 195

JO - Yonsei Medical Journal

JF - Yonsei Medical Journal

SN - 0513-5796

IS - 1

ER -