The funding factor

a cross-disciplinary examination of the association between research funding and citation impact

Erjia Yan, Chaojiang Wu, Min Song

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper intends to illuminate the relationship between science funding and citation impact in seven STEMM disciplines (science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine). Using a regression model with Heckman bias correction, we find that funding has a positive, significant association with a paper’s citations in STEMM fields. Further analyses show that this association is magnified by the factors of multiple authorship and multiple institutions. For funded papers in STEM, multi-author and multi-institution papers tend to receive even more citations than single-authored and single-institution papers; however, funded papers in Medicine received less gain in citation impact when either factor is considered. Based on the finding that funding support has a stronger association with citation impact when it is treated as a binary variable than as a count variable, this paper recommends the allocation of funding to researchers without active funding support, instead of giving awards to those with multiple funding supports at hand.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)369-384
Number of pages16
JournalScientometrics
Volume115
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Apr 1

Fingerprint

funding
examination
Medicine
medicine
science
mathematics
engineering
regression
trend
STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

@article{924c8111e5c84dbc9f2d48c904d02649,
title = "The funding factor: a cross-disciplinary examination of the association between research funding and citation impact",
abstract = "This paper intends to illuminate the relationship between science funding and citation impact in seven STEMM disciplines (science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine). Using a regression model with Heckman bias correction, we find that funding has a positive, significant association with a paper’s citations in STEMM fields. Further analyses show that this association is magnified by the factors of multiple authorship and multiple institutions. For funded papers in STEM, multi-author and multi-institution papers tend to receive even more citations than single-authored and single-institution papers; however, funded papers in Medicine received less gain in citation impact when either factor is considered. Based on the finding that funding support has a stronger association with citation impact when it is treated as a binary variable than as a count variable, this paper recommends the allocation of funding to researchers without active funding support, instead of giving awards to those with multiple funding supports at hand.",
author = "Erjia Yan and Chaojiang Wu and Min Song",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11192-017-2583-8",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
pages = "369--384",
journal = "Scientometrics",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

The funding factor : a cross-disciplinary examination of the association between research funding and citation impact. / Yan, Erjia; Wu, Chaojiang; Song, Min.

In: Scientometrics, Vol. 115, No. 1, 01.04.2018, p. 369-384.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The funding factor

T2 - a cross-disciplinary examination of the association between research funding and citation impact

AU - Yan, Erjia

AU - Wu, Chaojiang

AU - Song, Min

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - This paper intends to illuminate the relationship between science funding and citation impact in seven STEMM disciplines (science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine). Using a regression model with Heckman bias correction, we find that funding has a positive, significant association with a paper’s citations in STEMM fields. Further analyses show that this association is magnified by the factors of multiple authorship and multiple institutions. For funded papers in STEM, multi-author and multi-institution papers tend to receive even more citations than single-authored and single-institution papers; however, funded papers in Medicine received less gain in citation impact when either factor is considered. Based on the finding that funding support has a stronger association with citation impact when it is treated as a binary variable than as a count variable, this paper recommends the allocation of funding to researchers without active funding support, instead of giving awards to those with multiple funding supports at hand.

AB - This paper intends to illuminate the relationship between science funding and citation impact in seven STEMM disciplines (science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine). Using a regression model with Heckman bias correction, we find that funding has a positive, significant association with a paper’s citations in STEMM fields. Further analyses show that this association is magnified by the factors of multiple authorship and multiple institutions. For funded papers in STEM, multi-author and multi-institution papers tend to receive even more citations than single-authored and single-institution papers; however, funded papers in Medicine received less gain in citation impact when either factor is considered. Based on the finding that funding support has a stronger association with citation impact when it is treated as a binary variable than as a count variable, this paper recommends the allocation of funding to researchers without active funding support, instead of giving awards to those with multiple funding supports at hand.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034239211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034239211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11192-017-2583-8

DO - 10.1007/s11192-017-2583-8

M3 - Article

VL - 115

SP - 369

EP - 384

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

SN - 0138-9130

IS - 1

ER -