The influence of hand grip strength on surgical outcomes after surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis

a preliminary result

Feng Shen, Ho Joong Kim, Na Kyoung Lee, Heoung Jae Chun, Bong Soon Chang, Choon Ki Lee, Jin S. Yeom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background Context: Although a number of prognostic factors have been demonstrated to be associated with surgical outcome of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS), no study has investigated the relation between hand grip strength (HGS) and treatment outcome of DLSS. Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to examine the influence of HGS on surgical outcomes after surgery for patients with DLSS. Study Design: This is an observational study. Patient Sample: Patients who underwent spine surgery for DLSS were included in the study. Outcome Measures: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQOL (EQ-5D), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back or leg pain were assessed. Materials and Methods: A total of 172 consecutive patients who underwent spine surgery for DLSS were included in the present study. Patients were assigned to either high HGS group (≥26 kg for men and ≥18 kg for women, n=124) or low HGS group (<26 kg for men and <18 kg for women, n=48) based on their preoperative HGS performance. Oswestry Disability Index, EQ-5D, and VAS scores for back and leg pain were assessed and compared between two groups preoperatively, 3 and 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome measure was baseline-adjusted ODI scores 6 months after surgery. The secondary outcome measures, including the overall ODI score, EQ-5D score, VAS score for back and leg pain, were assessed at each time point during the 6-month follow-up period. Results: As primary outcome, baseline-adjusted ODI scores were significantly lower in the high HGS group than in the low HGS group 6 months after surgery. In the secondary outcome measurements, the ODI, EQ-5D, and VAS scores for back and leg pain improved significantly with time after surgery in both groups. The effects of HGS group on the overall changes in the ODI and EQ-5D scores during the 6-month period were significantly different between the two groups; however, they were not significantly different on VAS score for back and leg pain. The pattern of change in the ODI during the follow-up period was significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: Patients with preoperative high HGS display better surgical outcome in terms of disability and health status 6 months after spine surgery. Preoperative HGS can act as a predictor of surgical outcome in patients with DLSS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2018-2024
Number of pages7
JournalSpine Journal
Volume18
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Spinal Stenosis
Hand Strength
Visual Analog Scale
Back Pain
Leg
Spine
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Shen, Feng ; Kim, Ho Joong ; Lee, Na Kyoung ; Chun, Heoung Jae ; Chang, Bong Soon ; Lee, Choon Ki ; Yeom, Jin S. / The influence of hand grip strength on surgical outcomes after surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis : a preliminary result. In: Spine Journal. 2018 ; Vol. 18, No. 11. pp. 2018-2024.
@article{3631a702170a43f09d977a7e20aae198,
title = "The influence of hand grip strength on surgical outcomes after surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary result",
abstract = "Background Context: Although a number of prognostic factors have been demonstrated to be associated with surgical outcome of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS), no study has investigated the relation between hand grip strength (HGS) and treatment outcome of DLSS. Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to examine the influence of HGS on surgical outcomes after surgery for patients with DLSS. Study Design: This is an observational study. Patient Sample: Patients who underwent spine surgery for DLSS were included in the study. Outcome Measures: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQOL (EQ-5D), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back or leg pain were assessed. Materials and Methods: A total of 172 consecutive patients who underwent spine surgery for DLSS were included in the present study. Patients were assigned to either high HGS group (≥26 kg for men and ≥18 kg for women, n=124) or low HGS group (<26 kg for men and <18 kg for women, n=48) based on their preoperative HGS performance. Oswestry Disability Index, EQ-5D, and VAS scores for back and leg pain were assessed and compared between two groups preoperatively, 3 and 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome measure was baseline-adjusted ODI scores 6 months after surgery. The secondary outcome measures, including the overall ODI score, EQ-5D score, VAS score for back and leg pain, were assessed at each time point during the 6-month follow-up period. Results: As primary outcome, baseline-adjusted ODI scores were significantly lower in the high HGS group than in the low HGS group 6 months after surgery. In the secondary outcome measurements, the ODI, EQ-5D, and VAS scores for back and leg pain improved significantly with time after surgery in both groups. The effects of HGS group on the overall changes in the ODI and EQ-5D scores during the 6-month period were significantly different between the two groups; however, they were not significantly different on VAS score for back and leg pain. The pattern of change in the ODI during the follow-up period was significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: Patients with preoperative high HGS display better surgical outcome in terms of disability and health status 6 months after spine surgery. Preoperative HGS can act as a predictor of surgical outcome in patients with DLSS.",
author = "Feng Shen and Kim, {Ho Joong} and Lee, {Na Kyoung} and Chun, {Heoung Jae} and Chang, {Bong Soon} and Lee, {Choon Ki} and Yeom, {Jin S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.009",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "2018--2024",
journal = "Spine Journal",
issn = "1529-9430",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "11",

}

The influence of hand grip strength on surgical outcomes after surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis : a preliminary result. / Shen, Feng; Kim, Ho Joong; Lee, Na Kyoung; Chun, Heoung Jae; Chang, Bong Soon; Lee, Choon Ki; Yeom, Jin S.

In: Spine Journal, Vol. 18, No. 11, 01.11.2018, p. 2018-2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of hand grip strength on surgical outcomes after surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis

T2 - a preliminary result

AU - Shen, Feng

AU - Kim, Ho Joong

AU - Lee, Na Kyoung

AU - Chun, Heoung Jae

AU - Chang, Bong Soon

AU - Lee, Choon Ki

AU - Yeom, Jin S.

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Background Context: Although a number of prognostic factors have been demonstrated to be associated with surgical outcome of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS), no study has investigated the relation between hand grip strength (HGS) and treatment outcome of DLSS. Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to examine the influence of HGS on surgical outcomes after surgery for patients with DLSS. Study Design: This is an observational study. Patient Sample: Patients who underwent spine surgery for DLSS were included in the study. Outcome Measures: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQOL (EQ-5D), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back or leg pain were assessed. Materials and Methods: A total of 172 consecutive patients who underwent spine surgery for DLSS were included in the present study. Patients were assigned to either high HGS group (≥26 kg for men and ≥18 kg for women, n=124) or low HGS group (<26 kg for men and <18 kg for women, n=48) based on their preoperative HGS performance. Oswestry Disability Index, EQ-5D, and VAS scores for back and leg pain were assessed and compared between two groups preoperatively, 3 and 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome measure was baseline-adjusted ODI scores 6 months after surgery. The secondary outcome measures, including the overall ODI score, EQ-5D score, VAS score for back and leg pain, were assessed at each time point during the 6-month follow-up period. Results: As primary outcome, baseline-adjusted ODI scores were significantly lower in the high HGS group than in the low HGS group 6 months after surgery. In the secondary outcome measurements, the ODI, EQ-5D, and VAS scores for back and leg pain improved significantly with time after surgery in both groups. The effects of HGS group on the overall changes in the ODI and EQ-5D scores during the 6-month period were significantly different between the two groups; however, they were not significantly different on VAS score for back and leg pain. The pattern of change in the ODI during the follow-up period was significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: Patients with preoperative high HGS display better surgical outcome in terms of disability and health status 6 months after spine surgery. Preoperative HGS can act as a predictor of surgical outcome in patients with DLSS.

AB - Background Context: Although a number of prognostic factors have been demonstrated to be associated with surgical outcome of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS), no study has investigated the relation between hand grip strength (HGS) and treatment outcome of DLSS. Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to examine the influence of HGS on surgical outcomes after surgery for patients with DLSS. Study Design: This is an observational study. Patient Sample: Patients who underwent spine surgery for DLSS were included in the study. Outcome Measures: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQOL (EQ-5D), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back or leg pain were assessed. Materials and Methods: A total of 172 consecutive patients who underwent spine surgery for DLSS were included in the present study. Patients were assigned to either high HGS group (≥26 kg for men and ≥18 kg for women, n=124) or low HGS group (<26 kg for men and <18 kg for women, n=48) based on their preoperative HGS performance. Oswestry Disability Index, EQ-5D, and VAS scores for back and leg pain were assessed and compared between two groups preoperatively, 3 and 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome measure was baseline-adjusted ODI scores 6 months after surgery. The secondary outcome measures, including the overall ODI score, EQ-5D score, VAS score for back and leg pain, were assessed at each time point during the 6-month follow-up period. Results: As primary outcome, baseline-adjusted ODI scores were significantly lower in the high HGS group than in the low HGS group 6 months after surgery. In the secondary outcome measurements, the ODI, EQ-5D, and VAS scores for back and leg pain improved significantly with time after surgery in both groups. The effects of HGS group on the overall changes in the ODI and EQ-5D scores during the 6-month period were significantly different between the two groups; however, they were not significantly different on VAS score for back and leg pain. The pattern of change in the ODI during the follow-up period was significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: Patients with preoperative high HGS display better surgical outcome in terms of disability and health status 6 months after spine surgery. Preoperative HGS can act as a predictor of surgical outcome in patients with DLSS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046633281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046633281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.009

DO - 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.009

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 2018

EP - 2024

JO - Spine Journal

JF - Spine Journal

SN - 1529-9430

IS - 11

ER -