The infrabony defect and its determinants

C. K. Kim, S. H. Choi, T. S. Kim, J. Kaltschmitt, P. Eickholz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the defect width of infrabony defects in a cross-sectional study and to evaluate whether the defect width is a function of defect depth. Material and Methods: Complete sets of intra-oral radiographs of patients with severe periodontitis, which exhibited at least one infrabony defect, were digitised and evaluated. The following parameters were measured: depth and width of the infrabony defect, defect angle, and width of the interdental spaces. Results: Fifty-one patients (26 women), ranging from 21 to 73 yr of age (48.5 ± 13.4 yr), contributed a total of 1272 teeth with 135 infrabony defects (10.6%). Seventeen infrabony defects were located at sites without a neighboring tooth. Infrabony defects were statistically more prevalent in the mandible (n = 82) than in the maxilla (p = 0.013), and more prevalent at mesial sites (n = 92) than at distal sites (p < 0.001). At infrabony defects, the width of interdental spaces at the most coronal extension of the alveolar crest could be measured only at sites with neigboring teeth 2.67 ± 0.78 mm (range: 1.19-5.70 mm). Analysis failed to reveal a statistically significant difference between defect width at sites with (2.64 ± 0.82 mm) and sites without (2.76 ± 0.70 mm) a neighboring tooth. Multilevel regression analysis revealed narrow defect angles to be related to deep infrabony defects, whereas width of the interdental space and distal location were related to wide defects. Conclusion: Defect angle depended on defect depth and defect width was not different at sites with or without a neighboring tooth. Even in severe periodontitis, infrabony defects are found only at a minority of teeth.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)498-502
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Periodontal Research
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Tooth
Periodontitis
Multilevel Analysis
Maxilla
Mandible
Cross-Sectional Studies
Regression Analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Periodontics

Cite this

Kim, C. K. ; Choi, S. H. ; Kim, T. S. ; Kaltschmitt, J. ; Eickholz, P. / The infrabony defect and its determinants. In: Journal of Periodontal Research. 2006 ; Vol. 41, No. 6. pp. 498-502.
@article{443a6a96b3404960a055b210b2eeabab,
title = "The infrabony defect and its determinants",
abstract = "Background and Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the defect width of infrabony defects in a cross-sectional study and to evaluate whether the defect width is a function of defect depth. Material and Methods: Complete sets of intra-oral radiographs of patients with severe periodontitis, which exhibited at least one infrabony defect, were digitised and evaluated. The following parameters were measured: depth and width of the infrabony defect, defect angle, and width of the interdental spaces. Results: Fifty-one patients (26 women), ranging from 21 to 73 yr of age (48.5 ± 13.4 yr), contributed a total of 1272 teeth with 135 infrabony defects (10.6{\%}). Seventeen infrabony defects were located at sites without a neighboring tooth. Infrabony defects were statistically more prevalent in the mandible (n = 82) than in the maxilla (p = 0.013), and more prevalent at mesial sites (n = 92) than at distal sites (p < 0.001). At infrabony defects, the width of interdental spaces at the most coronal extension of the alveolar crest could be measured only at sites with neigboring teeth 2.67 ± 0.78 mm (range: 1.19-5.70 mm). Analysis failed to reveal a statistically significant difference between defect width at sites with (2.64 ± 0.82 mm) and sites without (2.76 ± 0.70 mm) a neighboring tooth. Multilevel regression analysis revealed narrow defect angles to be related to deep infrabony defects, whereas width of the interdental space and distal location were related to wide defects. Conclusion: Defect angle depended on defect depth and defect width was not different at sites with or without a neighboring tooth. Even in severe periodontitis, infrabony defects are found only at a minority of teeth.",
author = "Kim, {C. K.} and Choi, {S. H.} and Kim, {T. S.} and J. Kaltschmitt and P. Eickholz",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0765.2006.00895.x",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "498--502",
journal = "Journal of Periodontal Research",
issn = "0022-3484",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "6",

}

Kim, CK, Choi, SH, Kim, TS, Kaltschmitt, J & Eickholz, P 2006, 'The infrabony defect and its determinants', Journal of Periodontal Research, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 498-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2006.00895.x

The infrabony defect and its determinants. / Kim, C. K.; Choi, S. H.; Kim, T. S.; Kaltschmitt, J.; Eickholz, P.

In: Journal of Periodontal Research, Vol. 41, No. 6, 01.12.2006, p. 498-502.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The infrabony defect and its determinants

AU - Kim, C. K.

AU - Choi, S. H.

AU - Kim, T. S.

AU - Kaltschmitt, J.

AU - Eickholz, P.

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - Background and Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the defect width of infrabony defects in a cross-sectional study and to evaluate whether the defect width is a function of defect depth. Material and Methods: Complete sets of intra-oral radiographs of patients with severe periodontitis, which exhibited at least one infrabony defect, were digitised and evaluated. The following parameters were measured: depth and width of the infrabony defect, defect angle, and width of the interdental spaces. Results: Fifty-one patients (26 women), ranging from 21 to 73 yr of age (48.5 ± 13.4 yr), contributed a total of 1272 teeth with 135 infrabony defects (10.6%). Seventeen infrabony defects were located at sites without a neighboring tooth. Infrabony defects were statistically more prevalent in the mandible (n = 82) than in the maxilla (p = 0.013), and more prevalent at mesial sites (n = 92) than at distal sites (p < 0.001). At infrabony defects, the width of interdental spaces at the most coronal extension of the alveolar crest could be measured only at sites with neigboring teeth 2.67 ± 0.78 mm (range: 1.19-5.70 mm). Analysis failed to reveal a statistically significant difference between defect width at sites with (2.64 ± 0.82 mm) and sites without (2.76 ± 0.70 mm) a neighboring tooth. Multilevel regression analysis revealed narrow defect angles to be related to deep infrabony defects, whereas width of the interdental space and distal location were related to wide defects. Conclusion: Defect angle depended on defect depth and defect width was not different at sites with or without a neighboring tooth. Even in severe periodontitis, infrabony defects are found only at a minority of teeth.

AB - Background and Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the defect width of infrabony defects in a cross-sectional study and to evaluate whether the defect width is a function of defect depth. Material and Methods: Complete sets of intra-oral radiographs of patients with severe periodontitis, which exhibited at least one infrabony defect, were digitised and evaluated. The following parameters were measured: depth and width of the infrabony defect, defect angle, and width of the interdental spaces. Results: Fifty-one patients (26 women), ranging from 21 to 73 yr of age (48.5 ± 13.4 yr), contributed a total of 1272 teeth with 135 infrabony defects (10.6%). Seventeen infrabony defects were located at sites without a neighboring tooth. Infrabony defects were statistically more prevalent in the mandible (n = 82) than in the maxilla (p = 0.013), and more prevalent at mesial sites (n = 92) than at distal sites (p < 0.001). At infrabony defects, the width of interdental spaces at the most coronal extension of the alveolar crest could be measured only at sites with neigboring teeth 2.67 ± 0.78 mm (range: 1.19-5.70 mm). Analysis failed to reveal a statistically significant difference between defect width at sites with (2.64 ± 0.82 mm) and sites without (2.76 ± 0.70 mm) a neighboring tooth. Multilevel regression analysis revealed narrow defect angles to be related to deep infrabony defects, whereas width of the interdental space and distal location were related to wide defects. Conclusion: Defect angle depended on defect depth and defect width was not different at sites with or without a neighboring tooth. Even in severe periodontitis, infrabony defects are found only at a minority of teeth.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750435502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750435502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2006.00895.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2006.00895.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 17076773

AN - SCOPUS:33750435502

VL - 41

SP - 498

EP - 502

JO - Journal of Periodontal Research

JF - Journal of Periodontal Research

SN - 0022-3484

IS - 6

ER -